National Socialist Movement South Carolina

Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal

2009-11-14T09:38:00.001-08:00

Joe and Jose

You have two families: "Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California.

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.

Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number,
and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".

Ready? Now pay attention...

Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00
per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has
$31,231.00.

Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or
$31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has
$31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for
his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now
has $24,031.00.

Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and
local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has
$31,200.00.

Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or
welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per
year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps
and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe
Legal now has $9,631.00.

Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose
Illegal pays $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal
still has $ 31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal
now has $7,231.00.

Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has
$31,200.00.

Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.

Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities,
gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after
work.

Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe
Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get
a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after
school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services,
but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

You see how this works now?
If you vote for or support any politician that supports illegal aliens...

You are part of the problem!

It's way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!

Border-Crossing Penalties

2009-11-02T15:56:00.000-08:00

IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOR.

IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.

IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.

IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM
AGAIN.

IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY
AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO
POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.

IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET
A JOB
A DRIVERS LICENSE
SOCIAL SECURITY CARD
WELFARE
FOOD STAMPS
CREDIT CARDS,
SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE
FREE EDUCATION
FREE HEALTH CARE
A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON

AND IN MANY INSTANCES YOU CAN VOTE.

Liberals vs. Conservatives

2009-11-01T11:05:00.000-08:00

RIGHT VS. LEFT

If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.

If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.

If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy.

A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.

If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as independently successful.

Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government protection.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.

A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.

Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.

A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.

A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a conservative slips and falls in a store, he gets up, laughs and is embarrassed.

If a liberal slips and falls, he grabs his neck, moans like he's in labor and then sues.

If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.

A liberal will delete it because he's "offended."

"IN GOD WE TRUST!"

Obama was born in Kenya, says a Kenya magazine... back in June 27, 2004

2009-10-17T06:40:00.000-07:00

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.

Barrack Obama
"It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race," Ryan, 44, said in a statement. "What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play."

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was "truly outrageous" that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

"I feel for him actually," Obama told a Chicago TV station. "What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody."

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

"Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state," she said.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, "There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere."

Americans threatened with jail time, huge fines by refusing Obama's forced health insurance

2009-10-14T18:27:00.000-07:00

31 Questions and Answers about the Internal Revenue Service

2009-10-14T12:59:00.000-07:00

Swine Flu Vaccine?

2009-10-08T21:58:00.000-07:00

Who Brought the Slaves to America?

2009-10-08T10:38:00.000-07:00

The story of the slaves in America begins with Christopher Columbus. His voyage to America was not financed by Queen Isabella, but by Luis de Santangelo, who advanced the sum of 17,000 ducats (about 5,000 pounds-today equal to 50,000 pounds) to finance the voyage, which began on August 3, 1492.

Columbus was accompanied by five 'maranos' (Jews who had foresworn their religion and supposedly became Catholics), Luis de Torres, interpreter, Marco, the surgeon, Bemal, the physician, Alonzo de la Calle and Gabriel Sanchez (1).

Gabriel Sanchez, abetted by the other four Jews, sold Columbus on the idea of capturing 500 Indians and selling them as slaves in Seville, Spain, which was done. Columbus did not receive any of the money from the sale of the slaves, but he became the victim of a conspiracy fostered by Bemal, the ship's doctor. He, Columbus, suffered injustice and imprisonment as his reward. Betrayed by the five maranos (Jews) whom he had trusted and helped. This, ironically, was the beginning of slavery in the Americas (2).

The Jews were expelled from Spain on August 2, 1492, and from Portugal in 1497. Many of these Jews emigrated to Holland, where they set up the Dutch West Indies Company to exploit the new world.

In 1654, the first Jew, Jacob Barsimson, emigrated from Holland to New Amsterdam (New York) and in the next decade many more followed him, settling along the East Coast, principally in New Amsterdam and Newport, Rhode Island. They were prevented by ordinances issued by Governor Peter Stuyvesant from engaging in the domestic economy, so they quickly discovered that the territory inhabited by the Indians would be a fertile field. There were no laws preventing the Jews from trading with the Indians.

The first Jew to begin trading with the Indians was Hayman Levy, who imported cheap glass beads, textiles, earrings, armbands and other cheap adornments from Holland which were traded for valuable fur pelts. Hayman Levy was soon joined by Jews Nicholas Lowe and Joseph Simon. Lowe conceived the idea of trading rum and whiskey to the Indians and set up a distillery in Newport, where these two liquors were produced. Within a short time there were 22 distilleries in Newport, all of them owned by Jews, manufacturing and distributing 'firewater.' The story of the debauching of the Indians with its resultant massacres of the early settlers, is a dramatic story in itself.

It is essential to comprehend the seaport of Newport. It is important in order to recognize the Jewish share in the Slave commerce. There was a period when it was commonly referred to as 'The Jewish Newport-World center of Slave Commerce.' All together, at this time, there were in North America six Jewish communities: Newport, Charleston, New York, Philadelphia, Richmond, and Savanuah. There were also many other Jews, scattered over the entire East Coast. Although New York held first place in the settlers of Jews in North America, Newport held second place.

New York was also the main source of Kosher meat, supplying the North American settlements, then the West Indies and also South America. Now Newport took over! Newport also became the great trade harbour of the East Coast of North America. There, vessels from other ports met, to exchange commodities. Newport, as previously mentioned, represented the foremost place in the commerce of rum, whiskey, and liquor dealings. And to conclude, it finally became the Main Center of Slave dealings. It was from this port that the ships left on their way across the ocean, to gather their black human cargo and then derive great sums of money in exchange for them.

An authentic, contemporary report, based on authority, indicates that of 128 Slave ships, for instance, unloaded in Charleston, within one year, their "Cargo," 120 of these were undersigned by Jews from Newport and Charleston by their own name. About the rest of them, one can surmise, although they were entered as Boston (1), Norfolk (2), and Baltimore (4), their real owners were similarly the Jewish slave dealers from Newport and Charleston.

One is able to assess the Jewish share in the entire dealings of the Newport, if one considers the undertaking of a lone Jew, the Portuguese, Aaron Lopez, who plays an important part in the over-all story of the Jews and Slavery.

Aaron Lopez
Concerning the entire commerce of the Colonies, and the later State of Rhode Island, (which included Newport) bills of lading, concessions, receipts, and port clearances carried the signature name of the Jew Aaron Lopez (3). This all took place during the years 1726 to 1774. He had therefore more than 50% of all dealings under his personal control for almost fifty years. Aside from that there were other ships which he owned, but sailed under other names.
In the year 1749, the first Masonic Lodge was established. Ninety percent of the members of this first lodge, fourteen all told, were Jews. And one knows that only so-called "prominent" individuals were accepted. Twenty years later, the second Masonic Lodge, "King David," was established. It is a fact that all of these members were Jews.

In the meantime, the Jewish influence in Newport had reached such proportions that President George Washington decided to pay them a visit. Upon his appearance, both of the Masonic Lodges sent an emissary—a Jew named Moses Seixas (4) —to approach the President with a petition, in which the Jews of Newport stated: "If you will permit the children of Abraham to approach you with a request, to tell you that we honor you, and feel an alliance...... and then: "Until the present time the valuable rights of a free citizen have been withheld. However, now we see a new government coming into being based on the Majesty of the people, a government, not sanctioning any bigotry nor persecution of the Jew, rather, to concede the freedom of thought, which each shares, whatever Nation or Language, as a part of the great Government machine."

It is necessary at this point to consider the disclosures as to who in reality obtained this legendary freedom in America at the founding of the Union. To be sure, the province became independent and severed from the English Jurisdiction. However, we can see from the petition (5) which Moses Seixas offered President Washington in the name of the Jews of Newport, that it was not in reality this type of freedom which they had in mind. They were merely concerned about themselves, and their "own civil rights," which had been withheld. Therefore, following the Revolutionary War, the Jews were accorded equal rights, and freed of all restrictions! And the Negroes? The Revolutionary War not withstanding, they remained Slaves! In the year 1750, one sixth of the population in New York was Negroid, and proportionately in the Southern parts of the Country, they outnumbered the others, but the proclamation of Freedom did not touch them. More of this later.

Let us scrutinize at close range this dismal handwork of the Jews which gave them influence and power, so we may comprehend the Slave Trade; for there has been so much written since that time by the zealous Jewish writers, that at the present, long since removed, it might appear natural, for the time element has a tendency to make things nebulous.

Let us follow the journey of one ship, owned by a slave dealer, Aaron Lopez, which had made many trips to the African coast.

For instance, in the month of May, 1752, the ship "Abigail" was equipped with about 9,000 gallons of rum, a great supply of iron foot and hand restraints, pistols, powder, sabres, and a lot of worthless tin ornaments, and under the command of the Jewish Captain Freedman, sailed off for Africa. There were but two Mates and six sailors comprising the crew. Three and one half months later they landed on the African Coast. Meantime, there had been constructed an African Agency, by the Jewish slave dealers, who had corralled them, and prepared them for sale. This organization reaching deep into Africa, had many ramifications, including the heads of groups, villages, etc. This method to win over these leaders for the Jewish slave trade, was similar to' that which the Jews had employed with the Indians.

At first, they presented them with rum, and soon found themselves in an alcoholic delirium. When the gold dust, and ivory supply was exhausted, they were induced to sell their descendants. At first their wives, and then their youths. Then they began warfare among each other, plotted and developed mostly by the Jews, and if they captured prisoners, these, too, were exchanged for rum, ammunitions and weapons to the Jews', using them for further campaigns to capture more Negroes. The captured Blacks were linked two by two and driven through the medieval forests to the coast. These painful treks required weeks, and some of them frequently became ill, and felled by exhaustion, and many unable to rise even though the bull whip was applied as an encourager. They were left to die and were devoured by wild beasts. It was not unusual to see the bones of the dead laying in the tropical sun, a sad and gruesome reminder to those who would later on tread this path.

It has been calculated that for each Negro who withstood the rigors of this wandering, there still had to be the long voyage across the ocean, before they reached American soil, nine out of ten died! And when one considers that there was a yearly exodus of ONE MILLION black slaves, then, and only then, can one assess the tremendous and extensive exodus of the African people. At present Africa is thinly populated, not alone due to the 1,000,000 literally dragged out of huts, but due to the five to nine million who never reached their destination. Once they reached the coast, the black slaves were driven together, and restraints were applied to hold them until the next transport ship docked. The agents—many of them Jews—who represented the Chief, then began the deal with the Captain. Each Negro was personally presented to him. But the captains had learned to become suspicious. The Black one must move his fingers, arms, legs, and the entire body to insure that there were not any fractures. Even the teeth were examined. If a tooth was lacking, it lowered the price. Most of the Jew agents knew how to treat sick Negroes with chemicals in order to sell them as sound. Each Negro was valued at about 100 gallons of rum, 100 pounds of gun powder, or in cash between 18 to 20 dollars. The notations of a captain inform us that on September 5, 1763, one Negro brought as much as 200 gallons of rum, due to the bidding among the agents, raising the price.

Women under 25 years, pregnant or not, resulted in the same measure, if they were well and comely. Any over 25 years lost 25%.

And here it should be stated that those Negroes, purchased free at the African Coast for 20 to 40 dollars, were then resold by the same slave dealers in America for two thousand dollars.

This gives one an idea how the Jews managed to acquire tremendous fortunes. Following the bargaining, Captain Freedman paid the bill, either in merchandise or cash. He also recalled some advice which his Jewish employers gave him as he left Newport for Africa: "Pour as much water into the rum as you possibly can." In this manner the Negro chiefs were cheated two times by the Newport Jews!

The next step was to shave the hair from the head of the acquired slaves. Then they were bound and branded with a hot iron, either on the back, or the hip, identifying them with their owners. Now the Negro slave was indeed the property of the Jewish purchaser. If he fled he could be identified. Following this procedure, there was a farewell celebration. There were instances when entire families were brought out of the interior, to the coast, and then separated through the buyer—the father going with one ship, the sons and daughters into another. These "farewell" celebrations were usually packed with emotion, tears, drama and sadness. There was little joy, if ever.

The following day the transport began from land to ship. It was managed by taking four to six Negroes at one time in rowboats to the ship. Of course the slave dealers were aware of how the Negro loved his homeland above all else, and could only be induced by great force to leave it. So, some of the Negroes would leap into the water. But here the overseers were prepared with sharp dogs and retrieved the fleeing men. Other Negroes preferred drowning. What came aboard alive was immediately undressed. Here was another opportunity to jump overboard and reach land and freedom. But the slave dealers were pitiless and ruthless; they were merely concerned to get their Black cargo to America with the least loss. Therefore, an escapee, recaptured, had both of his legs cut off before the eyes of the remaining Negroes in order to restore "Order."

On board the ship the Negroes were separated into three groups. The men were placed in one part of the ship. The women into another, whereby the lusty Captain arranged it so that the youngest, mostly comely Negro women were accessible to him.

The children remained on deck, covered with a cloth in bad weather. In this fashion the slave ship proceeded on its journey to America. In the main, the ships were too small, and not at all suitable to transport people. They were barely equipped to transport animals, which the Negroes were likened to. In one space, one meter high (39 inches) these unfortunate creatures were placed into a horizontal position, pressed close together. Mostly they were chained together. In this position they had to remain for three months, until the end of the voyage. Rarely was there a captain who sympathized with them or evidenced any feelings whatever for these pitiable creatures. Occasionally they would be taken in groups to the deck for fresh air, shackled in irons.

Somehow, these Negroes were expendable and endured much. On occasion, one of them became insane, killing the other one pressed closely to him. They also had their fingernails closely cut so they could not tear at each other's flesh. The most horrible battles came about among the men, to acquire a centimeter or two for a comfortable position. It was then that the slave overseer stepped in with his bullwhip. The unimaginable, horrible, human excrement in which these slaves had to endure these trips is impossible to describe.

In the women's quarters the same conditions prevailed. Women gave birth to children lying pressed closely together. The younger Negro women were constantly raped by the captain and the crew resulting, thereby, a new type of Mulatto as they came to America.

In Virginia, or in any of the other Southern port cities, the slaves were transferred to the land and immediately sold. A regular auction would take place, following the method of purchase in Africa. The highest bidder obtained the "Ware." In many cases—due to the indescribable filth—some of the Blacks became ill during the sea voyage from Africa to America. They became unemployable. In such cases the captain accepted any price. It was rare to dispose of them for no one wanted to purchase a sick Negro. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Jewish, unethical doctor senses a new form of revenue. They purchased the sick Negro for a small sum, then treated him, and sold him for a large sum. On occasion, the captain would be left with a few Negroes for whom he did not find a buyer. In that case he returned to Newport and sold them to the Jews for cheap domestic help. In other cases, the Jew owner of the ships took them over. This is why the city of Newport and its surroundings had 4,697 black slaves in the year 1756.

Slavery did not extend to the North. Moreover, in many of the North American Colonies, slavery was strictly forbidden. Georgia came under discussion; likewise also Philadelphia. And again it was the Jews who managed a loophole, which had given them freedom following the Revolutionary War, so, they schemed to make slave trading legal.

One had but to read the names of those persons living in Philadelphia who were requesting the elimination of existing laws regarding the slavery dealing. They were: the Jews Sandiford, Lay, Woolman, Solomon, and Benezet. That explained it all! But let us turn back to the slave ship "Abigail." Its captain—and we are reading from his ship's books—did a profitable business. He sold all of his Negroes in Virginia, invested some of the money in tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton, and went on to Newport where he deposited his wares.

We learn from Captain Freedman's books that the "Abigail" was a small ship and could only accommodate 56 people. He managed, however, to clear from one trip 6,621 dollars, which he in turn delievered to the owner of the ship: one Aaron Lopez.

The staggering amounts of money acquired by the Jew ship owners and slavery dealers is better illustrated when we emphasize the many years in which this sale and purchase of human flesh was practiced. Prior to 1661, all of the Colonies had laws prohibiting slavery. It was in that year that the Jews had become powerful enough to bring about the repeal of these laws, and slavery began in earnest.

The Jews had discovered that the Colonists needed additional manpower to help them clear their fields for planting, helping in the construction of dwellings, and in general to help with harvesting their crops. This was particularly true of the Southern states which we have referred to earlier. The Southerners had vast tracts of rich soil suitable for rice, cotton, tobacco and cane sugar. At first, impoverished Europeans were recruited. English prison doors were opened and finally prisoners ot war from England and Holland were brought to the Colonies, made to work until they had paid the cost of transporting them by ship and then set free.

It doesn't take a Jew long to discover what his brothers are doing, so a group of Jews settled in Charleston, South Carolina, where they set up distilleries for making rum and whiskey. They, too, learned that they could trade with the natives on the West Coast of Africa for ivory, and several ships were purchased and sent to Africa, trading the usual glass beads and other cheap ornaments for ivory, which, however, took up but little space on board ship. It occurred to these Jew traders that they could supply the plantations in the South with 'Black ivory', needed under swampy and malarial conditions which European labor could not tolerate without sickness, and which would not only fill the holds of their ships, but bring enormous profits. (This same group had earlier tried selling Indians as slaves but they found them completely unsatisfactory, as the Indians would not tolerate this type of work.) Thus, another segment of the slave trading had become active and profitable out of Charleston, South Carolina. Several shiploads of Black slaves were sent by the Dutch West Indies Company to Manhattan.

During this time there were a number of plantation owners established in the West Indies and two Jews, Eyrger and SayUer, with strong Rothschild connections in Spain, formed an agency called ASIENTO, which later operated in Holland and England. It was through these connections that Jews in Holland and England exerted influence and both of these connections cooperated in helping the Jews provide Black Slaves for the Colonists.

With the yearly capture and transport of one million Black slaves it is not difficult to figure that from 1661 to 1774 (one hundred thirteen years) approximately one hundred ten million slaves had been removed from their native land. About ten percent, or ELEVEN MILLION, Black slaves reached the Colonies alive.

We have talked about the small ship "Abigail" which could accommodate only 56 people and yet the profits per trip were enormous, with little or no investment. There were many other ships but we will concentrate here on only a few, such as the "La Fortuna," "Hannah," "Sally" or the "Venue" which made very great profits. The "La Fortuna," by the way, transported approximately 217 slaves on each trip. The owner cleared not less than $41,438.00 from such a trip. These were dollars which the slave dealers 'could keep'. And these were dollars of value which would buy a great deal in return.

When one considers that the Jews of Newport owned about 300 slave-transporting ships, active without interruption, docking at Newport-Africa, Charleston, (or Virginia), one can approximate the tremendous earnings which made their way to Jewish ship owners. Indeed, the Jews admit, that of the 600 ships, leaving Newport harbor into all the world, "at least half of them" went their way to Africa, and we know what these ships going to Africa "were seeking."

The fact that Aaron Lopez had control of over more than half of the combined deals in the Colonies of Rhode Island, with Newport, is well-known. The well-known Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein, in his book, The Story of the Jews in Newport, attempts to remove these facts, maintaining that there is not any evidence that the Jews were connected with the Slave Trade. It is therefore imperative to prove that the Jew was indeed connected with the slave trading. Especially so since this rabbi insists they had made great contributions, and how very "blessed" their residence became for the city of Newport. Surely Morris A. Gutstein will grant us permission to present the facts which he was unable to find.

Turning to one report of the Chamber of Commerce of the "Rhode Island Colony" in the year 1764, we find, for instance, that in the year 1723 "a few merchants in Newport" devised the idea to send their Newport rum to the coast of Africa. It developed into such a great export that in the matter of a few years "several thousand (hogsheads)" of rum went that way. To which purpose did this rum serve?

The Carnegie Institute in Washington, D.C., presents and makes public authentic documents entitled "Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade in America". We wish to present a few facts from this particular collection of original documents and scrutinize them at closer range, and not at all to prove the heretofore Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein in error. In this collection of the first American institute of learning, we evaluate the capital "Rhode Island" which contributed the main share of the public documentation regarding the Slave trading. Here we find documented the recipients of the numerous shipping letters, also letters to the Slave dealers, and correspondence to the ship's captains, who were about 15% Jews, living in Newport. Among these we find, for instance, the Jew Isaac Elizar. He wrote a letter to Captain Christopher Champlin on February 6, 1763, saying he would like to be an agent for a load of slaves. Then follows the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez, and one of the main slave dealers, Jacob Rod Rivera-the father-in-law of Aaron Lopez. And then there is Aaron Lopez, himself, and many, many more other Jews. Although we have considered Aaron Lopez several times, the size of this documented treatise limits us, and we cannot describe all of the writers concerned in the Slavery Dealing correspondence, their names and the special dates—rather, we wish to study the documentation of the 'Carnegie Institute' itself—keeping Aaron Lopez in mind. We wish to see what in the main this Jew was pursuing and what his business was. This is due to the fact that Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein presents him as a "lofty and fine civilian of Newport" who was so generous and even "made contributions to welfare."

In a great number of published original unprejudiced writings in the Carnegie Institute, we find that Aaron Lopez pursued a tremendous commerce in rum with the African coast in exchange for slaves. These irrefutable facts are as follows:

June 22, 1764, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
July 22, 1765, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain Nathaniel Briggs.
July 22, 1765, a letter to Captain Abraham All.
February 4, 1766, a letter to Captain William Stead by Aaron Lopez.
March 7, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
February 20, 1766, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain William Stead.
October 8, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
February 9, 1767, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
Aside from that, there are similar statements out of letters by Aaron Lopez in the original, which he directed to the Captains Henry Cruger, David Mill, Henry White, Thomas Dolbeare, and William Moore. Indeed, one letter by Captain William Moore to Aaron Lopez & Company, is particularly revealing, and of special mention at this point. We wish to remark on the main contents of this letter in which Captain Moore writes: "I wish to advise you that your ship 'Ann' docked here night before last with 112 slaves, consisting of 35 men, 16 large youths, 21 small boys, 29 women, 2 grown girls, 9 small girls, and I assure you this is such a one rumcargo (rum in exchange for slaves) which I have not yet encountered, among the entire group there may be five to which one could take exception."

The date of the above letter was November 27, 1773. We have not yet concluded, because of lack of space, the excerpts and grateful compilations made available by the "Carnegie Institute."

On November 29, 1767, the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez—who had been cheated by one of his kind—from Charleston, where he had journeyed to better control his Black cargo, wrote Aaron Lopez at Newport:

"These Negroes, which Captain Abraham All delivered to me, were in such poor condition due to the poor transportation, that I was forced to sell 8 boys and girls for a mere 27 (pounds), 2 other for 45 (pounds) and two women each for 35 (pounds)." (No doubt, English money)

Abraham Pereia Mendez was very angry and accused Aaron Lopez of "cheating" him. This letter delineates to us that this generous and fine citizen of Newport was insatiable in his greed for money. This is what caused the Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein to present this nobleman, Aaron Lopez, to pursue his objectionable methods. Negroes presented to him but a commodity.

In all of the letters which the "Carnegie Institute" published, it stresses the lack of human sympathy for the poor Negro slaves. This lack of feeling and compassion for the abused and pitiful Blacks at the hands of their Jewish dealers, can be read out of the diary of a captain who manned a ship owned by Aaron Lopez. The entrees concern a trip from the African Coast to Charleston. Moreover, they are authentic documents, published by the "Camegie Institute" in Washington, D.C., calling attention to an organization which had heretofore known little or nothing about; neither had they encountered further publicity in books or newspapers. Therefore, it is not to be wondered at that the facts of the leading share of American Jews in the slave trade could be pointed out as a monopoly, and unknown to the non-Jewish Americans, including the great masses of people all over the world. Others, however, acquainted with the facts, had good reason to remain painfully quiet.

The captain of another ship, the "Othello" among other things, makes the following entries in his diary:

February 6th: One man drowned in the process of loading.
March 18th: Two women went overboard because they had not been locked up.
April 6th: One man dead with Flux. (No doubt an illness.)
April 13th: One woman dead with Flux.
May 7th: One man dead with Flux.
June 16th: One man dead by Kap Henry.
June 21st: One man dead by James Fluss.
July 5th: One woman dead with fever.
July 6th: One girl, sick for two months, died.
This vessel was on its way for five months. What terrible and unspeakable suffering was the lot of these millions of Blacks, who were torn with brutal force from their friendly African huts, jammed together, like animals below deck, and then sold with less concern than selling a head of cattle. Small wonder that ten of them died, being purchased for just a few dollars, and then sold for the sum of $2,000.00.

Some Negroes managed, through insurrection, to gain control of one or another ship and turned it around, with full sails, toward their African home. The crew of one slave ship, "Three Friends" for instance, tortured their Black cargo in such a manner that the Negroes reciprocated in a bloody rebellion. They killed the captain and the entire crew and threw the dead overboard. They then sailed back to Africa where they had barely escaped their hard-won freedom.

A similar fate struck the slave ship "Amistad". Among the slaves was the son of an enemy tribal chief. Once the ship was under way, he schemed with his compatriots to attack the ship's crew. Following a bloody battle, they managed to capture the captain. The Negro prince forced him to turn back to Africa, then in the evening, under cover of darkness, he changed his course, zigzagged for months untfl he came close to the American coast, and encountered a government ship. This took place in the year 1839 when slave trading was already forbidden and illegal.

The Negro slaves were freed and the captain punished. These sea voyages were not without danger when they had Black cargo, which accounts for the fact that the Jews most always engaged non-Jewish captains.

The slave dealers preferred to remain in their offices and counted the fat winnings following each journey, such as Aaron Lopez, who left his heirs one of the largest fortunes in the New England era.

When reviewing the documented facts contained herein, it is important that one always remembers that it was a lucky captain who did not lose more than 9 out of 19 slaves on the return trip.

It is equally important to remember that these poor Black creatures had to lie in human excrement for the entire trip. Think of it! No wonder sickness and disease took such a high toll. Remember the figures: approximately one hundred ten million Black people were captured and removed from their homeland in Africa. Only ELEVEN MILLION of these Black slaves reached the Colonies alive.

And the Jews still talk about the Germans and Hitler and how six million Jews were exterminated during World War II. This is the greatest LIE ever perpetrated upon the people of the world-whereas the story of the poor Black slaves is documented. Documented with TRUTH. The evidence is still available for the people of the world to see.

The "Carnegie Institute of Technology" is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

As this document is distributed, eventually reaching the hands of the Jew, the evidence will probably be removed and destroyed until finally all documentation is removed which is damaging to the Jew. The Jews have been engaged in this practice for centuries. Truth, however—truth which bears fact cannot remain covered or hidden forever—and more truths are being disclosed by those of us who intend to free America of these sons of the devil—the Jews.

The published documentation contained herein was obtained from the Carnegie Institute of Learning, presently known as "The Carnegie Institute of Technology."

The following is a partial of the slave ships owned by Jews:

'Abigail' by Aaron Lopez.
Moses Levy and Jacob Franks.
'Crown' by Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson.
'Nassau'by Moses Levy.
'Four Sisters' by Moses Levy.
'Anne & Eliza' by Justus Bosch and John Abrams.
'Prudent Betty' by Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix.
'Hester' by Mordecai and David Gomez.
'Elizabeth' by David and Mordecai Gomez.
'Antigua' by Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell.
'Betsy'by Wm. DeWoolf.
'PoUy'by James DeWoolf.
'White Horse' by Jan de Sweevts.
'Expedition' by John and Jacob Rosevelt.
'Charlotte' by Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks.
'Caracoa' by Moses and Sam Levy.
Slave-runners, also owned by Jews were the 'La Fortuna', the 'Hannah', the 'Sally', and the 'Venue'.

Some of the Jews of Newport and Charleston who were engaged in the distillery or slavery trade, or both, were: Isaac Gomez, Hayman Levy, Jacob Malhado, Naphtaly Myers, David Hart, Joseph Jacobs, Moses Ben Franks, Moses Gomez, Isaac Dias, Benjamin Levy, David Jeshuvum, Jacob Pinto, Jacob Turk, Daniel Gomez, James Lucana, Jan de Sweevts, Felix (cha-cha) de Souza (known as the 'Prince of Slavers' and second only to Aaron Lopez), Simeon Potter, Isaac Elizer, Jacob Rod, Jacol) Itodrigues Rivera, Haym Isaac Carregal, Abraham Touro, Moses Hays, Moses Lopez, Judah Touro, Abrtham Mendes and Abraham All.

Of some 600 ships leaving the port of Newport, more than 300 were engaged in the slave trade. A typical cargo of one ship, 'La Fortuna', was 217 slaves which cost about $4,300 and sold for $41,438.00.

Only about 10% of the slave ship captains were Jews, not wanting to subject themselves to the rigors of the 6-month journey. They preferred to stay at home and continue their distillery operations which continued to supply rum and whiskey to the Indians for many years at a very great profit.

REFERENCES DOCUMENTATION

Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Vols. Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America, Washington, D.C., 1930-1935.

"Carnegie Institute of Technology," Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Adventures of an African Slaver, by Malcolm Cowley, 1928. Published by Albert and Charles Bori, New York.

The Story of the Jews in Newport, by Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein.

The Jew Discovem America, by Cthmar Krainz.

The International Jew, by Henry Ford.

The Plot Against the Church, by Maurice Pinay.

Protocol for World Conquest, 1956, by The Central Conference of American Rabbis.

Behind Communism, by Frank L. Britton

Zionist Jews spreading sin and sickness through America like a wildfire

2009-10-08T10:30:00.000-07:00

Here is an exhaustive list proving, once and for all, that the radical homosexual movement in the United States is a Jewish movement. Jews created it and run it from top to bottom. They are pushing the perversion and degeneracy that is spreading disease, sin and sickness through America like a wildfire.

Larry Kramer — co-founder of "Act Up," a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men's Health Crisis

Alan Klein — co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM

Arnie Kantrowitz — co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

Jonathan D. Katz — founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].

Harvey Fierstein — film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay activist.

Moisés Kaufman — playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].

Israel Fishman — founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association], the world's first gay professional organization.

Bella Abzug and Edward Koch — both Jewish — the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].

Winnie Stachelberg — political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]

Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.

Tony Kushner — gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].

Len Hirsch — president of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.

Meg Moritz, Ph.D. — a Director and member of the Executive Committee of GLAAD.
Barbara Raab — an NBC-TV producer; a "Jewish lesbian feminist journalist, writer."

Charles Kaiser [?] — author & founding member of National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].

David Goodstein — owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate [1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.

Judy Wieder — Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.

Alison Bechdel [?] — cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly comic strip "Dykes to Watch Out For."

Kevin Koffler — Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.

Garrett Glaser — National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA] national board member.

Ronald Gold — reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association's policy that homosexuality is an illness.

Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany; founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term "transvestism"; fled Nazi Germany.

Fred Hochberg — deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].

Michael Berman — member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors. Mitchell Gold — HRC Board Marty Lieberman — HRC Board Andy Linsky — HRC Board Dana Perlman — HRC Board Abby Rubenfeld — HRC Board Andrew Tobias — HRC Board Lara Schwartz — Senior Counsel, HRC Heather Wellman — HRC Field Coordinator Dan Furmansky — HRC Senior Field Organizer, West Sally Green — HRC Associate Field Director

Rick Rosendall [?] — President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC.

Barney Frank — member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies

Kerry Lobel — executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

Robin Margolis, American coordinator of the Bi Women's Cultural Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].

Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund — and — the executive director of Freedom to Marry.

Jennifer Einhorn — Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD] Nancy Alpert [?] — Treasurer, GLAAD Judy Gluckstern — Board of Directors, GLAAD. Stephen M. Jacoby — Board of Directors, GLAAD. Matt Riklin — Board, GLAAD Carol Rosenfeld — Board, GLAAD. William Weinberger — Board, GLAAD Tanya Wexler — Board, GLAAD. David Huebner — GLAAD Counsel.

Richard Goldstein — Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics

Ron Schlittler — Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].

Craig Ziskin — Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG.

Debra Weill — Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.

Dody Goldstein — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

David Horowitz — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

Shawn Frank — Board of Directors, PFLAG.

Leon Weinstein — Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.

Kate Kendell [?], National Center for Lesbian Rights.

Gayle Rubin — lesbian author/activist.

Hilary Rosen — a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.

Roz Richter, American attorney and activist.

Bob Kunst — long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes.

"Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network" [GLSEN]. Board co-chairs: Marty Seldman, president

"National Gay & Lesbian Task Force" [NGLTF]. Board co-chairs: ..... Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M Dave Fleischer — Director of Training [political training], NGLTF. Craig Hoffman — Board of Directors, NGLTF. Beth Zemsky — Board, NGLTF. Marsha C. Botzer — Treasurer, NGLTF. Jeff Levi — first, Levi was NGTF's lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.

Bill Rubenstein, J.D. '86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project

Martin Duberman — author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.

Ben Schatz '81, J.D. '85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Foundation.

Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk Institute in San Francisco, the world's largest center for queer studies.

Sarah Schulman [1958- ], American playwright, novelist, and activist [one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian rights organization].

Susan Spielman — principal/head of Common Ground, an education/consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations, helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.

Gertrude Stein — wrote the first openly lesbian novel, "Q.E.D.," in 1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.

Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.

Michael Goff — founded Out magazine in 1992.

Paulette Goodman — founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from 1988-1992.

Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial Network; president and CEO of out.com.

Jim Levin — New York gay historian.

Barrett Brick — GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.

Robin Tyler — American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington and the national protest coordinator for the "Stop Dr. Laura" campaign; she produces women's comedy and music festivals, and operates a lesbian travel-tour company.

Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist, molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization].

Mark Elderkin [?] — co-founded Gay.com.

Leroy Aarons — American professor, journalist, and founder of the National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).

Dr. Donald I. Abrams — American physician, HIV expert, medical marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.

Johnny Abush (1952-2000) — [Canadian]; archivist of the International Jewish GBLT Archives.

Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.

Miriam Ben-Shalom [1948- ], American Army Reserves drill sergeant and gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the Reserves when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its first president.

Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].

Rob Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out Day [October 11th].

Scott Evertz, American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy [ONAP].

Gene Falk [?, Jewish name], American business executive; Senior Vice President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

Surina Kahn — American lesbian activist.

Larry Kessler — founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in New England.

Kathy Levinson — American investor and philanthropist; serves on the board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.

Judith Light — actress, activist for gay causes.

David Mixner — gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics; president Bill Clinton's Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.

Dan Savage — American author of gay-themed books [The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant; Skipping Towards Gomorrah: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Pursuit of Happiness in America] and gay-themed- sex-advice columnist [Savage Love].

Susan Schuman, American executive vice-president and general manager of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.

Scott Seomin, American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].

Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg] — founder and coordinator of the Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.

David Sine [?] — American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian cable TV network.

Rex Wockner — longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news for the gay press since 1985.

Jack Fritscher — became Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine [1977].

Leslie Feinberg [1949- ], American trade unionist, transgender activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul].

Allan Ginsburg - late Jewish poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association

Obama eligibility case survives 1st court test

2009-10-05T19:51:00.000-07:00

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=112015

Auschwitz expert: Blueprints found in Berlin not of death camp

2009-10-04T22:04:00.000-07:00

A leading expert on Auschwitz on Sunday denigrated the importance of the finding of plans for the construction of the extermination camp, which was reported this weekend in the German tabloid Bild. He said the documents have been known to scholars for many years and that they were not plans to build the extermination camp of Auschwitz-Birkenau, but rather earlier plans for the building of a forced labor camp.

Prof. Robert Jan van Pelt, a internationally acknowledged expert on the planning and construction of Auschwitz, said that based on what he had seen on the Internet, there seemed to be nothing new about the documents. He was one of several scholars who expressed doubts about the significance of the Bild story.

Van Pelt, an architectural historian, said that copies of the plans of the stages of the camp's construction were also in the archive of the Polish National Museum at Auschwitz and in an archive in Moscow. He said that the source of the new copies was unclear since, according to Bild, the plans were found in an apartment in Berlin, whereas copies that were in the SS offices in Berlin were destroyed by Allied bombing in 1944. Van Pelt said he also doubted the authenticity of the signature of the SS chief, Heinrich Himmler, since such a high-ranking officer would not have signed such plans, and none of the copies he had ever seen bore such a signature.

Van Pelt also said the words "gas chamber" on one of the drawings meant a room in which disinfection of clothing was done by means of gas, and that the sketch is not of an extermination camp established in 1942, but rather of earlier plans for a huge concentration camp in which a force of 130,000 slave laborers was intended to work.

Van Pelt suggested the plans might be fakes, motivated by the lucrative market in Nazi memorabilia and documents.

Ralf Georg Reuth, the historian who wrote the piece in Bild, told Haaretz yesterday that the existence of such plans in Russian archives was known, "but German institutions have no originals, and therefore the importance of the finding of such original material is very great." Reuth would not elaborate on where and when the plans were discovered, or whether they had been submitted to experts for study.

2009-10-03T21:45:00.000-07:00

Barack Hussein Obama

2009-10-03T21:39:00.000-07:00

Who is Obama

http://www.theobamafile.com/

Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?

2009-10-01T21:15:00.000-07:00

Congressman eyes lawsuit over president's eligibility

2009-10-01T21:07:00.000-07:00

PETITION FOR PUBLIC RELEASE OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE

2009-10-01T20:59:00.000-07:00

To: Electoral College, Congress of the United States, Federal Elections Commission, U.S. Supreme Court, President of the United States, other controlling legal authorities
Whereas, by requirement of the United States Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, no one can be sworn into office as president of the United States without being a natural born citizen;

Whereas, there is sufficient controversy within the citizenry of the United States as to whether presidential election winner Barack Obama was actually born in Hawaii as he claims;

Whereas, Barack Obama has refused repeated calls to release publicly his entire Hawaiian birth certificate, which would include the actual hospital that performed the delivery;

Whereas, lawsuits filed in several states seeking only proof of the basic minimal standard of eligibility have been rebuffed;

Whereas, Hawaii at the time of Obama's birth allowed births that took place in foreign countries to be registered in Hawaii;

Whereas, concerns that our government is not taking this constitutional question seriously will result in diminished confidence in our system of free and fair elections;

SIGN THE PETITION

http://www.wnd.com/obama_petition

(copy and paste link)

Senator says Obama's birth location doesn't matter

2009-10-01T20:58:00.000-07:00

The American people need to be aware how unsalvaged these blacks really are.

2009-10-01T16:24:00.000-07:00

Black Crime Rates:

• Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder,and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
• When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.

• Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.

• The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

Interracial Crime

• Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.

• Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Fortyfive percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.

• Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

• Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

Gangs

• Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.

• Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs.Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

Incarceration

• Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.

• Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.

The rate at which Blacks commit murder is thirteen times that of Whites; Rape and assault, ten times. These figures, as given by the F.B.I. reports, vary somewhat from year to year but fairly represent the trend for the past decade.

According to the justice Dept, 1 in every 4 Black males between the ages of 20 and 29 is currently in prison or on probation or parole.

Though only 12% of the U.S. population, Blacks commit more than half of all rapes and robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S.

Approximately 50% of all Black males will be arrested and charged with a serious felony during their lifetime.

A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a White person than Vice Versa.

Black rapists choose White victims over half (54.9%) of the time, 30X as often as Whites choose Blacks.

The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when Whites commit violence they do it to Blacks 2.4% of the time.Blacks, on the other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN HALF the time.(3)

In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites.

Many people argue that high Black incarceration rates show that police center enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white-collar crimes.However, Blacks commit a disproportionate number of white-collar offenses as well. In 1990, Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be arrested for forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Whites.

Many people believe that crime is a product of poverty and lack of "advantages." However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the highest average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the nation in just about every category of crime including murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft.D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control, highest police costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers per citizen,and highest rate of incarceration. Its permanent population is over 80 White.

Health Issues

Young blacks between 19 and 24 years of age are 20 times more likely to be infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, than young adults in any other racial or ethnic group in the United States.

Blacks are 50 times more likely to have syphilis then whites.

Blacks have a 100 times greater likely hood to carry gonorrhea then white people.

Black people are 14 times more likely to have the AIDS virus then whites.

Administration Will Cut Border Patrol Deployed on U.S-Mexico Border

2009-09-28T12:05:00.000-07:00

Even though the Border Patrol now reports that almost 1,300 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border is not under effective control, and the Department of Justice says that vast stretches of the border are “easily breached,” and the Government Accountability Office has revealed that three persons “linked to terrorism” and 530 aliens from “special interest countries” were intercepted at Border Patrol checkpoints last year, the administration is nonetheless now planning to decrease the number of Border Patrol agents deployed on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Border Patrol Director of Media Relations Lloyd Easterling confirmed this week--as I first reported in my column yesterday--that his agency is planning for a net decrease of 384 agents on the U.S.-Mexico border in fiscal 2010, which begins on October 1.

A Department of Homeland Security annual performance review updated by the Obama administration on May 7 said the Border Patrol “plans to move several hundred Agents from the Southwest Border to the Northern Border to meet the FY 2010 staffing requirements, with only a small increase in new agents for the Southwest Border in the same year.”

Easterling said on Tuesday that in fiscal 2009, 17,399 Border Patrol agents have been deployed on the U.S.-Mexico border. In fiscal year 2010, the Border Patrol plans to decrease that by 384 agents, leaving 17,015 deployed along the Mexican frontier. At the same time, the number of Border Patrol agents deployed on the U.S.-Canada border will be increased by 414, from a fiscal 2009 total of 1,798 agents to a fiscal 2010 total of 2,212.

The Border Patrol is responsible for securing a total of 8,607 miles of border, including the U.S.-Mexico border, the U.S.-Canada border from Washington state to Maine, and sectors of coastline in the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Each year, the Border Patrol sets a goal for “border miles under effective control (including certain coastal sectors).” “Effective control,” as defined by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, means that when the Border Patrol detects an illegal border crosser in a particular area of the border the agency can be expected to succeed in apprehending that person.

In the May 7 update of its performance review, DHS said the Border Patrol’s goal for fiscal 2009 was to have 815 of the 8,607 miles of border for which the agency is responsible under “effective control.” The review also said the Border Patrol’s goal for fiscal 2010 was to again have 815 miles of border under “effective control,” meaning DHS was not planning to secure a single additional mile of border in the coming year.

However, Acting Deputy Assistant Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Todd Owen told a House committee in July that the Border Patrol already had 894 miles of border under effective control as of May 31 of this year. These 894 miles, Owen said, included 697 miles on the Mexican border, 32 miles on the Canadian border and 165 miles in the coastal sectors.

Easterling said this week that as of now the Border Patrol still has the same 894 miles of border under effective control that it had under effective control as of May 31. He also said the agency would not relinquish control of any of these miles in the coming year. After the beginning of the new fiscal year, he said, the Border Patrol would reevaluate the situation and set a new goal for border miles under “effective control” for 2010 that would at least equal, and might exceed, the 894 miles currently under effective control.

“The intention is to take back the border incrementally, and make gains that we can keep,” Easterling said. “We do not intend, nor will we give back, miles that we have gained control over.”

Easterling said the Border Patrol would be able to maintain the current number of miles under effective control on the Mexico border with fewer agents deployed there thanks to “force multipliers,” including new fencing, roads and other infrastructure that has been built in recent years. He also cited the assistance the Border Patrol receives from local police and sheriffs departments and community watch groups.

But even if the Border Patrol is able to maintain or marginally improve on the current level of security on the U.S.-Mexico border, most of the border will remain effectively open to smuggling both contraband and persons.

The entire U.S.-Mexico border is 1,954 miles long, according to the International Boundary and Water Commission. While 697 of those miles are now under “effective control,” according to the Border Patrol, 1,257 miles are not under “effective control.”

Reports from other government agencies paint a vivid picture of the massive drug and alien smuggling that takes place in these uncontrolled expanses and the national security problem created by unsecured border lands.

Each year, the Justice Department’s National Drug Intelligence Center produces “drug market analyses” for each of 32 regions of the country that the NDIC describes as “high intensity drug trafficking areas.” Five of these areas sit along the U.S.-Mexico border. These include the California border region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and South Texas. The latest reports, released in March and April of this year, use candid language in portraying the U.S.-Mexican frontier as wide open to drug smuggling and even vulnerable to penetration by potential terrorists.

The California-Mexico border, the NDIC said, was “easily breached” on both foot and in vehicles.

“The vast border area presents innumerable remote crossing points that traffickers exploit to smuggle illicit drugs, primarily marijuana, into the country from Mexico,” said NDIC. “These areas are easily breached by traffickers on foot, in private vehicles, or in all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) as they smuggle drugs between POEs [ports of entry], particularly the mountainous areas in eastern San Diego County and the desert and sand dune areas in Imperial County.”

Arizona’s border was judged to be open not only to drug smugglers but also aliens with “extensive criminal records” and from “special interest countries,” which are defined as “countries that could export individuals who could bring harm to the United States through terrorism.”

“Some criminal organizations smuggle aliens and gang members into the United States,” said NDIC’s report on Arizona. “These particular individuals typically have extensive criminal records and pose a threat, not only to the Arizona HIDTA [high intensity drug trafficking area] region but also to communities throughout the United States. Alien smuggling organizations reportedly also smuggle aliens from countries other than Mexico, including special-interest countries.”

“Special-interest countries are those designated by the intelligence community as countries that could export individuals who could bring harm to the United States through terrorism,” said the NDIC report.

The NDIC described the Arizona-Mexico border as “largely underprotected” in the areas between official ports of entry.

“Large amounts of illicit drugs are smuggled into the area from Mexico, and bulk cash is transported from the area into Mexico,” said NDIC. “These trafficking activities are facilitated by several factors unique to the region, including the continuing economic and population growth in Arizona’s two primary drug markets (Phoenix and Tucson), the highways that connect major metropolitan areas in Arizona with major illicit drug source areas in Mexico, and a remote, largely underprotected border area between Arizona’s ports of entry (POEs).

“Vast stretches of remote, sparsely populated border areas are located within the HIDTA region; these areas are especially conducive to large-scale drug smuggling,” said NDIC. “By the end of January 2009, 108 miles of the 262-mile shared border between Arizona and Mexico will have some type of fencing. However, few physical barriers exist in border areas between POEs, particularly in the West Desert area of the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) Tucson Sector, to impede drug traffickers, chiefly Mexican DTOs, from smuggling illicit drug shipments into the United States from Mexico.”

Part of the New Mexico border was described as “an ideal smuggling corridor.”

“Southwestern New Mexico—specifically Hidalgo, Luna, and Dona Ana Counties—shares a 180-mile border with Mexico,” said NDIC. “More than half the length of this border is desolate public land that contains innumerable footpaths, roads, and trails. Additionally, many ranches are located along the border. These factors and minimal law enforcement coverage make the area an ideal smuggling corridor for drugs and other illicit goods and services— primarily alien smuggling into the United States and weapons and bulk cash smuggling into Mexico. Mexican DTOs smuggle multihundred-kilogram quantities of illicit drugs through this portion of the HIDTA region annually.”

Like the California border, the South Texas border is also “easily breached,” according to the NDIC.

“The combination of vast stretches of remote, sparsely populated land and extensive crossborder economic activity at designated ports of entry (POEs) creates an environment conducive to large-scale drug smuggling,” said NDIC. “Few physical barriers exist between POEs to impede drug traffickers, particularly Mexican DTOs, from smuggling illicit drug shipments into the United States from Mexico. Along many areas of the U.S.-Mexico border in South Texas, the Rio Grande River can be easily breached by smugglers on foot or in vehicles, enabling Mexican DTOs to smuggle multikilogram quantities of illicit drugs, primarily marijuana and cocaine, into the United States.”

In the West Texas sector, the NDIC again raised the possibility that terrorists could exploit the border to enter the country.

“Moreover, the region’s location along the U.S.-Mexico border poses national security and law enforcement issues for the region, such as alien smuggling, weapons transportation, and terrorist entry into the United States through and between ports of entry,” said NDIC.

While the U.S. government may be failing to exert effective control over most of the border, identical language in the NDIC reports for Arizona and West Texas said that drug trafficking organizations have set up “gatekeeper” operations that control smuggling into the U.S. and levy taxes on the smugglers they let through.

“Gatekeepers regulate the drug flow from Mexico across the U.S.-Mexico border into the United States by controlling drug smugglers’ access to areas along the border,” said the Arizona and West Texas NDIC reports. “Gatekeepers collect ‘taxes’ from smugglers on all illicit shipments that are moved through these areas, including drugs and illegal aliens. The taxes are generally paid to the DTO that controls the area; the DTO then launders the tax proceeds. Gatekeepers sometimes resort to extortion, intimidation, and acts of violence to collect taxes from smugglers. Gatekeepers also reportedly bribe corrupt Mexican police and military personnel in order to ensure that smuggling activities occur without interruption.”

“Gatekeepers generally operate at the behest of a Mexican drug trafficking organization (DTO) and enforce the will of the organization through bribery, intimidation, extortion, beatings, and murder,” said the reports.

A Government Accountability Office report released on August 31 pointed out that the Border Patrol’s top priority is to stop terrorists and weapons of mass destruction from entering the United States and revealed that three person’s “linked to terrorism” and hundreds of aliens from “special interest countries” were intercepted at Border Patrol checkpoints in fiscal 2008. These checkpoints, which act as a final line of defense for the U.S. border, are typically set up on highways 25 to 100 miles north of the Mexican border.

“CBP reported that in fiscal year 2008, there were three individuals encountered by the Border Patrol at southwest border checkpoints who were identified as persons linked to terrorism,” said GAO.

“In addition, the Border Patrol reported that in fiscal year 2008 checkpoints encountered 530 aliens from special interest countries, which are countries the Department of State has determined to represent a potential terrorist threat to the United States,” said GAO. “While people from these countries may not have any ties to illegal or terrorist activities, Border Patrol agents detain aliens from special interest countries if they are in the United States illegally and Border Patrol agents report these encounters to the local Sector Intelligence Agent, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Joint Terrorism Task Force, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of Investigations, and the CBP National Targeting Center.”

The GAO also said one illegal alien detained in West Texas had come from Iran.

“For example,” said GAO, “according to a Border Patrol official in the El Paso sector, a checkpoint stopped a vehicle and questioned its three Iranian occupants, determining that one of those occupants was in the United States illegally. The individual was detained and turned over to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for further questioning.”

There has been much discussion in the past week about whether President Barack Obama will heed the advice of Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, to increase the U.S. troop deployment there. The administration, however, has already decided to decrease by 384 the Border Patrol agents deployed on our own southern frontier.

White Guilt Awareness Day

2009-09-27T20:39:00.000-07:00

Obama ties immigration to health care battle

2009-09-21T09:58:00.000-07:00

President Obama said this week that his health care plan won’t cover illegal immigrants, but he argued that’s all the more reason to legalize them and ensure they eventually do get coverage.

He also staked out a position that anyone in the country legally should be covered—–a major break with the 1996 welfare reform bill, which limited most federal assistance programs only to citizens and longtime immigrants.

“Even though I do not believe we can extend coverage to those who are here illegally, I also don’t simply believe we can simply ignore the fact our immigration system is broken,” Mr Obama said Wednesday evening in a speech to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute. “That’s why I strongly support making sure folks who are here legally have access to affordable, quality health insurance under this plan, just like everybody else.”

Mr Obama added, “If anything, this debate underscores the necessity of passing comprehensive immigration reform and resolving the issue of 12 million undocumented people living and working in this country once and for all.”

Republicans said that amounts to amnesty, calling it a backdoor effort to make sure current immigrants get health care.

"It is ironic that the president told the American people that illegal immigrants should not be covered by the health care bill, but now just days later he's talking about letting them in the back door," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee.

"If the American people do not want to provide government health care for illegal immigrants, why would they support giving them citizenship, the highest honor America can bestow?" Mr. Smith said.

But immigrant rights groups see the speech as a signal that Mr. Obama is committed to providing health care coverage for anyone in the United States legally, regardless of their citizenship status.

"It's the first time I've certainly heard, publicly, him talking more about legal immigrants," said Eric Rodriguez, vice president for research and advocacy at the National Council of La Raza (NCLR). "I think that was certainly positive progress. We were absolutely concerned about not hearing that."

45% Of Doctors Would Consider Quitting If Congress Passes Health Care Overhaul

2009-09-16T20:33:00.000-07:00

The Israeli occupation of America

2009-09-16T09:02:00.000-07:00

“Israel need not apologize for the assassination or destruction of those who seek to destroy it. The first order of business for any country is the protection of its people.” –Washington Jewish Week October 9, 1997

I came from a country occupied militarily by Israel to the land of “the free and the brave” only to find out it too was occupied politically by Israel.

The Palestinian people, holding on to whatever shred of hope they can, are counting on the day Americans see the error of their ways and change their opinion of the whole Middle East situation and understand it for what it truly is—-A conquered, oppressed people living a hellish existence under a maniacal, occupying power and who will then contact their representatives in Congress and have them put the heat on Israel in fulfilling the agreements she made years ago with the PLO such as Oslo, Taba, Camp David, Wye River, the Road Map, or even Annapolis.

The sad fact however is that the Americans—-as much as they champion themselves as a “free people”—–are in no better shape than the Palestinians. On the contrary, the American position is worse than that of the Palestinians. The Palestinians can identify the enemy—–he is the one with the gun and blowing away their loved ones. They KNOW they are occupied and oppressed. They KNOW how Israel occupied Palestine, killed its inhabitants and forced the majority of those who survived the carnage out of their homes and lands to then live as strangers in refugee camps.

The Americans however, have no idea. Like a drug addict who thinks he feels great after shooting up, he does not realize he is a slave, to his substance and to his pusher. The history of how the Zionists’ controlled England is not shrouded in mystery. Through Jewish control of the British government the Balfour Declaration was drafted that “gave” the land of Palestine to the Jews after WWI, a land they did not own or possess.

But how in the world did they occupy the United States politically? There is no real “Balfour Declaration” we can point to as proof.

Or can we?

Jewish influence in American politics—-while there from the earliest days and certainly apparent during the Wilson, Roosevelt and Truman administrations—-did not become a force it is today until the Kennedy era, or rather, AFTER the Kennedy era.

http://heshamtillawi.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/the-israeli-occupation-of-america-how-israel-gained-control-of-american-foreign-policy-and-public-opinion/

‘Judge Orders Early Discovery In Obama “Natural Born” Lawsuit’

2009-09-16T08:57:00.001-07:00

Judge David Carter, Central District of California, has ordered early discovery in a lawsuit questioning Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office based on his “natural born” citizenship status.

The issue of early discovery means Obama’s lawyers must produce documents, including his hospital records, birth certificate, name of doctor, and all of the signatures, proving his natural born status within 30 days.

Current Hawaiian governor Linda Lingle, a Republican, sealed access to Obama’s birth certificate last October, effectively barring anyone but Obama himself from obtaining a copy.

Lawyer Orly Taitz, who is leading the suit, ecstatically proclaimed she can have Obama out of office in 30 days.

New Socialist Agenda / New World Order

2009-09-15T23:19:00.000-07:00

Senate votes to block funds to ACORN

2009-09-15T20:36:00.000-07:00

The Senate voted Monday to block the Housing and Urban Development Department from giving grants to ACORN, a community organization under fire in several voter-registration fraud cases.

The 83-7 vote would deny housing and community grant funding to ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

The action came as the group is suffering from bad publicity after a duo of conservative activists posing as a prostitute and her pimp released hidden-camera videos in which ACORN employees in Baltimore gave advice on house-buying and how to account on tax forms for the woman’s income. Two other videos, aired frequently on media outlets such as the Fox News Channel, depict similar situations in ACORN offices in Brooklyn and Washington, D.C.

The Senate’s move would mean that ACORN would not be able to win HUD grants for programs such as counseling low-income people on how to get mortgages and for fair housing education and outreach.

The Senate's move would mean that ACORN would not be able to win HUD grants for programs such as counseling low-income people on how to get mortgages and for fair housing education and outreach.

Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., said that ACORN has received $53 million in taxpayer funds since 1994 and that the group was eligible for a wider set of funding in the pending legislation, which funds housing and transportation programs.

Just last week, the Census Bureau severed its ties with ACORN, saying it does not want the group's help in outreach efforts on the decennial count.

In recent months, Republicans have become increasingly critical of the census' ties with ACORN. The group, which advocates for poor people, conducted a massive voter registration effort last year and became a target of conservatives when some employees were accused of submitting false registration forms with names such as "Mickey Mouse."

Just last week, prosecutors in Miami-Dade County, Fla., arrested 11 people for falsifying hundreds of voter applications during a registration drive last year. ACORN tipped the authorities off to the problem.

On the hidden camera controversy, ACORN says it has fired the employees involved but has lashed out at Fox for pumping up the scandal.

In a statement, Bertha Lewis, ACORN's chief organizer, said the tapes had been doctored and violated Maryland's wiretapping laws. She promised to sue Fox.

Another ACORN spokesman, Scott Levenson, said the group believes the voices of the couple in the video shot in the Brooklyn office were dubbed over to alter the conversation and make the interaction appear more objectionable than it may have been.

ACORN sent a letter to Fox News President Roger Ailes, stating that the videotape was deceptive and had been dubbed over, and asking the network to stop showing the videos, Levensen said.

Fox News spokeswoman Dana Klinghoffer said the tapes were vetted editorially before they were aired.

The video was created by James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles and posted on BigGovernment.com, where O'Keefe identifies himself as an activist filmmaker.

Breitbart.com, which owns BigGovernment.com, did not immediately respond to a call and e-mails seeking comment.

On Monday, Lewis called the Senate's vote a "rare and politically convenient step" but noted that the group gets most of its funding from "its members and other supporters, so the decision will have little impact on overall operations."

The Senate measure is scheduled to pass this week and must be reconciled with a companion House measure that passed in July before becoming law.

http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html

http://patdollard.com/2008/10/husseins-rotten-acorns-are-falling-with-videos/

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2008/10/10/obamas-acorn-connection-to-voter-fraud.html?s_cid=rss:erbe:obamas-acorn-connection-to-voter-fraud

http://www.wsbtv.com/politics/20810566/detail.html

Newsweek’s War On White People

2009-09-15T20:25:00.000-07:00

"It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white”

Newsweek just launched an all out war on the mental well-being of white children in their September issue. The article is titled “See BabyDiscriminate.” The article demands, with religious fanaticism, that white children be made to shun all knowledge of racial differences and taught to feel guilty. The Newsweek article actually states that white children should be made to feel guilty to “knock down their glorified view of white people,” while black children should be built up with “ethnic pride.” White parents, and only white parents, are called on to go to great lengths to brainwash their children starting at age three.

However, amidst the extremist statements by Newsweek, some real bombshells about racial realities are admitted.

Here are some highlights:

1. “Kids as young as 6 months judge based on skin color.” – Newsweek

2. White parents, who welcome multiculturalism and embrace diversity, are terrified to talk to their own children about race for fear of what their own children might say.

3. 75% of non-white parents talk to their children about race, compared to only 25% of white parents.

4.White children 5 to 7 attending racially diverse schools universally had a better opinion of their own race than other races.

5. Whites are called on to begin intense multi-cultural indoctrination using videos and parental discussions at age 3, so as not to miss the right “developmental window.”

6. White children should be made to feel guilty for alleged wrongdoings by their race, to increase positive attitudes towards blacks.

7. Black children need to be coached on “ethnic pride” to pump them up and make them more likely to succeed in life.

8. 553 scientists signed a 2007 Supreme Court school amicus brief supporting school desegregation. However, the brief used many qualifiers and only said that desegregation “may” improve black performance. There was no real confidence in desegregation on the part of the scientists.

9. Diverse schools do not lead to more cross-race relationships. In fact the opposite is true. The more diverse a school, the more students self-segregate by race.

10. White children prefer a white Santa Claus and black children prefer a black Santa Claus.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/214989

Flag@whitehouse.gov is ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Update

2009-09-15T20:18:00.000-07:00

“Obama Was Not Accurate About Immigration”

2009-09-11T16:56:00.000-07:00

Roughly 24 hours after shouting at President Obama during an address to Congress, Rep. Joe Wilson appears on Sean Hannity's TV show to argue that it is possible for illegal immigrants to receive benefits under Obama's health reform proposal. "I apologize for speaking out," Wilson said, "but what he said was not accurate."

Wilson adds that he agrees with Hannity about the double standard in the media, and the "feigned outrage" over Wilson's outburst, when compared to former President Bush being booed in 2005 at a joint session of Congress, there was not much of an uproar.

Treblinka a Scientific Investigation

2009-09-10T05:40:00.000-07:00

Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?

2009-09-10T05:29:00.000-07:00

BORN IN THE USA? Shocker! Judge orders trial on eligibility issue

2009-09-10T05:21:00.000-07:00

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.

In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.

In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, also were restored to the case.

Want to know for certain where Obama was born? Demand the truth by joining the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.

The judge did comment that if there are legitimate constitutional questions regarding Obama's eligibility, they need to be addressed and resolved.

Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery.

If the case survives that challenge, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.

The case would be the first time, according to Kreep, that the actual merits of the dispute will have been heard in open court. A multitude of such disputes have been rejected out of hand by various state and federal courts. Even the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly has rejected urgent appeals to hear the evidence.

The suit alleges Obama is actually a citizen of Indonesia and "possibly still citizen of Kenya, usurping the position of the president of the United States of America and the commander-in-chief."

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated over $1 million to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest the questions.

WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

In the U.S. Justice Department's motion to dismiss, attorneys didn't address the concerns directly, but instead focused their efforts on technical procedures, suggesting the matter can't be decided in court and that the dozens of plaintiffs cannot demonstrate they have been injured by having Obama in the Oval Office.

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery.

"It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution's textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for president can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute. "Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch."

President Obama's defenders also said they would file a motion seeking to block any discovery of evidence at this point.

Kreep said said his addition to the case probably will mean additional arguments over the president's eligibility.

Among the long list of plaintiffs are former ambassador and presidential candidate Alan Keyes and longshot vice-presidential candidate Gail Lightfoot, both of whom ran in 2008.

Justice officials say because neither had a mathematical chance at winning, they were not directly harmed by the election of Obama.

But among the issues that appear to be looming is a claim that Obama's actual birth certificate from Kenya has emerged.

As WND reported over the holiday weekend, Lucas Smith, the man who tried to sell an alleged Barack Obama Kenyan birth certificate on eBay, filed court papers insisting – under threat of perjury – that the Obama birth certificate in his possession is the genuine article.

Taitz posted on her blog Smith's declaration, which claims he obtained the alleged birth certificate from Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, and insists it's real.

"The true and correct photocopy of the birth certificate obtained is attached to this affidavit as Exhibit A," the declaration reads. "I declare, certify, verify, state and affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing statements of fact and descriptions of circumstances and events are true and correct."

Smith's affidavit, which includes a copy of the certificate, has been filed Carter, whose works in the Central District of California.

In his filing, Smith declares that he traveled to Kenya in February and paid off a military officer in order to obtain a copy of the birth certificate from Coast General Hospital in Mombasa. The declaration also states that the hospital administrator signed and sealed the copy, which indicates Obama's birth in Africa on Aug. 4, 1961, at 7:24 p.m.

As WND reported, Smith released a video of the document he claims is a copy of Obama's hospital birth record, though WND's own investigation failed to substantiate the document's authenticity..

WND first reported earlier this year when Lucas Smith, a former resident of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and known by the eBay handle "colmado_naranja," claimed to have a document proving Obama's birth in Mombasa, Kenya.

After promising to reveal the document to WND, Smith then dropped communications with a team of people offering to help him verify the document, only fueling the belief the sale – and therefore the alleged document – was a scam.

WND followed Smith's ongoing saga as "colmado_naranja" as he attempted several times to sell the document, or photos and stories surrounding it, on eBay, only to have the auctions repeatedly removed by site administrators.

WND also launched an investigation into "colmado_naranja," which led through several online aliases and reported collaborators, including Dawnella Wilson, "InspectorSmith" and, eventually, Lucas Smith.

Smith, whose background includes a lengthy criminal record and a reported attempt to sell his kidney to a man in need of organ transplant, nonetheless insists that his motives are above board, even if his past looks dubious.

"I do have a background. I've made mistakes in my life," Smith told WND in an e-mail. "It took a guy like me to go and get tangible proof about Obama. I don't mind breaking a few laws or policies here and there. I don't mind paying the military in foreign countries to look the other way ... The military [in Africa] will grant you access to anything for just a few dollars. People are starving. So yes, it takes a guy like me to get things done once in a while."

An enhanced version of the Smith YouTube video has been published by Repubx.com, permitting a more legible examination of the document.

WND has also determined that a supposed Kenyan birth certificate previously released by attorney Orly Taitz probably is a forgery.

WND has reported on an authentic 1961-era Kenyan birth certificate, which looks distinctly different from the document Smith released in the video.

Because of the dearth of information about Obama's eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched a campaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simple question: "Where's the birth certificate?"

The campaign followed a petition that has collected more than 450,000 signatures demanding proof of his eligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question.

The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.

Your donation – from as little as $5 to as much as $1,000 – can be made online at the WND SuperStore. (Donations are not tax-deductible. Donations of amounts greater than $1,000 can be arranged by calling either 541-474-1776 or 1-800-4WND.COM. If you would prefer to mail in your contributions, they should be directed to WND, P.O. Box 1627, Medford, Oregon, 97501. Be sure to specify the purpose of the donation by writing "billboard" on the check. In addition, donations of billboard space will be accepted, as will significant contributions specifically targeted for geographic locations.)

Herman Rosenblat about his holocaust lies on ABC TV

2009-09-09T10:47:00.000-07:00

Herman Rosenblat is a Jewish man who told a fake story about how he survived the holocaust. He is not the first, and probably not the last person to fail with his lies supposed to maintain the holocaust myth. The question that comes up: what if the gas chambers also only existed in some people's mind? Facts show that... (Hungarian subtitles)

The Auschwitz History told by a jew

2009-09-08T20:43:00.000-07:00

This video presents evidence debunking the party line story surrounding the Auschwitz camp in Poland during the Nazi occupation, thereby undermining the "official holocaust" story(a fabricated hoax). The "history" about Auschwitz we generally hear about is the "history" supporting the zionist "understanding" about what went on during the Third Reich era of Germany. This video reveals that most of the "official history" of the "holocaust" is based on lies, myths, and war time propaganda.

White House Adviser Van Jones Resigns Amid Controversy Over Past Activism

2009-09-08T11:20:00.000-07:00

White House environmental adviser Van Jones resigned late Saturday after a simmering controversy over his past statements and activism erupted into calls for his ouster from Republican leaders on Friday.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs on Sunday explained the resignation on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos," saying, "Van Jones decided was that the agenda of this president was bigger than any one individual." The president does not endorse Jones's past statements and actions, "but he thanks him for his service," Gibbs said.

A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter, said Jones's past was not studied as intensively as other advisers because of his relatively low rank.

Jones's position did not require Senate confirmation, so he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected to. In addition, as an adviser to the Council on Environmental Quality, rather than to Obama directly, his past was not reviewed to the same degree as the more senior "assistants to the president" and other top advisers inside the West Wing.

The result was the revelation of a controversial past that, administration officials acknowledge, caught the White House off guard.

"He was not as thoroughly vetted as other administration officials," the official said. "It's fair to say there were unknowns."

The announcement that Jones was stepping down came minutes after midnight Sunday morning. "On the eve of historic fights for health care and clean energy, opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me," Jones said. "They are using lies and distortions to distract and divide."

He continued: "I have been inundated with calls -- from across the political spectrum -- urging me to 'stay and fight.' But I came here to fight for others, not for myself. I cannot in good conscience ask my colleagues to expend precious time and energy defending or explaining my past. We need all hands on deck, fighting for the future."

Jones, who joined the administration in March as special adviser for green jobs at the CEQ, had issued two public apologies in recent days, one for signing a petition in 2004 from the group 911Truth.org that questioned whether Bush administration officials "may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war" and the other for using a crude term to describe Republicans in a speech he gave before joining the administration.

His one-time involvement with the Bay Area radical group Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), which had Marxist roots, had also become an issue. And on Saturday his advocacy on behalf of death-row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was convicted of shooting a Philadelphia police officer in 1981, threatened to develop into a fresh point of controversy.

Fox News Channel host Glenn Beck launched the drive against Jones and all but declared war on him after a group Jones founded in 2005, ColorofChange.org, led an advertising boycott against Beck's show to protest his claim that Obama is a racist.

Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) called on Jones to resign Friday, saying in a statement, "His extremist views and coarse rhetoric have no place in this administration or the public debate."

Senator Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.) urged Congress to investigate Jones's "fitness" for the position, writing in an open letter, "Can the American people trust a senior White House official that is so cavalier in his association with such radical and repugnant sentiments?" On Saturday, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, wrote on his Twitter account, "Van Jones has to go."

Jones's resignation was foreshadowed Friday when Gibbs gave only tepid support for him when pressed, saying that Jones "continues to work for the administration." He declined to state that the adviser enjoyed the full support of President Obama, instead referring questions to the environmental council where he worked.

Jones, a towering figure in the environmental movement, had worked for the White House Council on Environmental Quality since March. He was a civil-rights activist in California before turning his focus to environmental and energy issues, and he won wide praise before joining the Obama administration for articulating a broad vision of a green economy Democrats could embrace.

White House adviser David Axelrod, on NBC's "Meet the Press," said Sunday he had not spoken with the president about Jones. "The political environment is rough, and so these things get magnified. But the bottom line is that he showed his commitment to the cause of creating green jobs in this country by removing himself as an issue, and I think that took a great deal of commitment on his part," he said.

On FOX News Sunday, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich declined to criticize Jones directly, though Alexander did question why the Obama administration had appointed so many issue czars.

"I don't think he's the issue," Alexander said. "I think the czars are the issue."

Former Vermont governor Howard Dean rallied to Jones' defense, saying he had signed the controversial 9-11 "Truther" petition by mistake.

"I think he was brought down. It's too bad," Dean said. "I think it's a loss for the country."

Panic in D.C.? Justice urges birth suit tossed

2009-09-08T10:43:00.000-07:00

The U.S. Justice Department is urging a federal judge in California to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of president.

The highly anticipated hearing tomorrow morning before Judge David Carter features attorney Orly Taitz and numerous plaintiffs, as well as a document that one person has sworn is the original birth certificate of Obama from Kenya – not Hawaii, where the administration maintains Obama was born.

In a motion filed Friday in Santa Ana, Calif., attorneys for the government did not directly address the merits of Taitz's claims, but instead focused their efforts on technical procedures, suggesting the matter can't be decided in court and that the dozens of plaintiffs cannot demonstrate they have been injured by having Obama in the Oval Office.

Want to know for certain where Obama was born? Demand the truth by joining the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

"It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution's textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for president can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute. "Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch."

The suit alleges Obama is actually a citizen of Indonesia and "possibly still citizen of Kenya, usurping the position of the president of the United States of America and the commander-in-chief."

Among the plaintiffs are former ambassador and presidential candidate Alan Keyes and longshot vice-presidential candidate Gail Lightfoot, both of whom ran in 2008.

Justice officials say because neither had a mathematical chance at winning, they were not directly harmed by the election of Obama.

According to the motion, "The [suit] does not allege, nor could it allege, that any of these plaintiffs were even on the ballot in enough states in the year 2008 to gain the requisite 270 electoral votes to win the presidential election."

As WND reported over the holiday weekend, Lucas Smith, the man who tried to sell an alleged Barack Obama Kenyan birth certificate on eBay, filed court papers insisting – under threat of perjury – that the Obama birth certificate in his possession is the genuine article.

The document is alleged by Lucas Smith to be Barack Obama's original, authentic birth certificate from Kenya.

Taitz posted on her blog Smith's declaration, which claims he obtained the alleged birth certificate from Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, and insists it's real.

"The true and correct photocopy of the birth certificate obtained is attached to this affidavit as Exhibit A," the declaration reads. "I declare, certify, verify, state and affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing statements of fact and descriptions of circumstances and events are true and correct."

Smith's affidavit, which includes a copy of the certificate, has been filed with Judge David Carter of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Carter is scheduled to preside over a hearing on the case on Sept. 8.

Taitz told WND she believes the swiftly approaching court date prompted Smith into action:

"He has been in touch with me for quite a while, and he emailed me the document with his signature," Taitz said. "I think he was trying to figure out the most expedient way to bring his message public, and maybe he felt that because I have a hearing coming, that would be the most expedient way."

Taitz hopes the court will order expedited discovery, a ruling that would open many of Obama's currently sealed documents, including his college records and Hawaiian long-form birth certificate, to court scrutiny.

"We'll see what happens on Tuesday. If Judge Carter has the guts, we may move very fast," Taitz told WND. "If expedited discovery is ordered, I'll be dashing to Occidental College and then be on a flight to Hawaii."

In his filing, Smith declares that he traveled to Kenya in February and paid off a military officer in order to obtain a copy of the birth certificate from Coast General Hospital in Mombasa. The declaration also states that the hospital administrator signed and sealed the copy, which indicates Obama's birth in Africa on Aug. 4, 1961, at 7:24 p.m.

As WND reported, Smith released a video of the document he claims is a copy of Obama's hospital birth record, though an investigation by Jerome Corsi maintains the document is a forgery.

WND first reported earlier this year when Lucas Smith, a former resident of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and known by the eBay handle "colmado_naranja," claimed to have a document proving Obama's birth in Mombasa, Kenya.

After promising to reveal the document to WND, Smith then dropped communications with a team of people offering to help him verify the document, only fueling the belief the sale – and therefore the alleged document – was a scam.

WND followed Smith's ongoing saga as "colmado_naranja" as he attempted several times to sell the document, or photos and stories surrounding it, on eBay, only to have the auctions repeatedly removed by site administrators.

WND also launched an investigation into "colmado_naranja," which led through several online aliases and reported collaborators, including Dawnella Wilson, "InspectorSmith" and, eventually, Lucas Smith.

Smith, whose background includes a lengthy criminal record and a reported attempt to sell his kidney to a man in need of organ transplant, nonetheless insists that his motives are above board, even if his past looks dubious.

"I do have a background. I've made mistakes in my life," Smith told WND in an e-mail. "It took a guy like me to go and get tangible proof about Obama. I don't mind breaking a few laws or policies here and there. I don't mind paying the military in foreign countries to look the other way ... The military [in Africa] will grant you access to anything for just a few dollars. People are starving. So yes, it takes a guy like me to get things done once in a while."

An enhanced version of the Smith YouTube video has been published by Repubx.com, permitting a more legible examination of the document.

WND has also determined that a supposed Kenyan birth certificate previously released by attorney Orly Taitz is also a forgery.

WND has reported on an authentic 1961-era Kenyan birth certificate, which looks distinctly different from the document Smith released in the video.

Authentic 1961-era Kenyan birth certificate obtained by WND

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest the questions.

WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

Because of the dearth of information about Obama's eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched a campaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simple question: "Where's the birth certificate?"

"Where's The Birth Certificate?" billboard at the Mandalay Bay resort on the Las Vegas Strip.

The campaign followed a petition that has collected more than 450,000 signatures demanding proof of his eligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question.

The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.

http://www.wnd.com/obama_petition

The New Republic: America's Future Recap

2009-09-08T10:36:00.000-07:00

By; Glenn Beck

We already know of at least five radical leftists currently advising our president — and these are just the ones who are open about their radical beliefs and far-left ideas:

• Van Jones, green jobs "czar" — admits he's a communist

• John Holdren, science "czar" — proposed "compulsory sterilization" and forced abortions to control population

• Cass Sunstein, regulatory "czar" — proposed bans on hunting and eating meat and proposed that your dog to be allowed to have an attorney in court. And a fairness doctrine for the Internet, which he has since stepped away from

• Carol Browner, global warming "czar" — was part of Socialist International, a group for "global governance"

• Ezekiel Emmanuel, health care adviser — proponent of the Complete Lives System, which puts values on lives based mostly by age

How many Marxists, communists and anti-capitalists do you have around you on a daily basis?

But President Obama doesn't just have socialists and communists advising him. On Monday night I told you about the people who helped write the stimulus: the Apollo Alliance.

Jeff Jones, one of the leaders of the Apollo Alliance, may or may not have ever advised the president — we don't know because we can't get the entrance records at the White House.

But we do know this: Jones' organization, which he chairs in New York, had a lot to do with the stimulus bill — according to Harry Reid:

"This legislation is the first step in building a clean energy economy that creates jobs.... The Apollo Alliance has been an important factor in helping us develop and execute a strategy that makes great progress on these goals and in motivating the public to support them."

Does the president know he's had two pretty big encounters with the founders of the Weather Underground? A group that bombed government buildings?

We asked the White House — we are still waiting on a response.

By the way, we've also told you that the White House has tried or wanted to go around the FBI to have vetting done by the White House. I would think that based on what's happening here at the White House, it's pretty important to have an outside eye vet some of the people who may be advising our president.

How many times do we have to find a Marxist, communist, socialist, a revolutionary or, what seems amazing to me, a simple anti-capitalist near, around or advising the president of the United States before we ask the question, when he promises this:

Frank Marshall Davis: Obama's Radical Communist Mentor

2009-09-05T00:10:00.000-07:00

2009-09-04T23:45:00.000-07:00

VAN JONES IS A RACIST, RADICAL, COMMUNIST WORKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOR obama.

2009-09-04T23:02:00.001-07:00

Raw Data: Van Jones in His Own Words:

A not-nearly exhaustive look at some of White House green jobs adviser Van Jones statements, delivered in video

"White Polluters" -

President Obama's "green jobs" adviser is distancing himself from the "9/11 truthers" -- Americans who say the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks may have been an inside job -- releasing a statement late Thursday that says he didn't read carefully a petition he signed in 2004 calling for an investigation into the Bush administration's knowledge of an impending attack.

In the statement, Van Jones also apologized again for several inflammatory remarks he made prior to joining the Obama administration. It was his second apology in two days.

"In recent days some in the news media have reported on past statements I made before I joined the administration -- some of which were made years ago. If I have offended anyone with statements I made in the past, I apologize. As for the petition [9/11 statement] that was circulated today, I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever."

Whether he agrees with the views expressed, Jones was a signatory on a 2004 statement calling on then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and others to launch an investigation into evidence that suggests "people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war."

The statement asked a series of critical questions hinting at Bush administration involvement in the attacks and called for "deeper inquiry." It was also signed by former Rep. Cynthia McKinney and Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans.

An aide to Jones told FOX News on Thursday night that the green jobs czar "did not carefully review the language in the petition." The aide did not say when Jones signed the petition or when he became aware of the controversy.

Jones' second mea culpa comes after a Wednesday apology in which Jones said he uttered "offensive words" in February when he called Republicans "assholes." He said the remarks "do not reflect the views of this administration" and its bipartisan aims.

But such statements just scratch the surface of Jones' past commentary, and could present a dilemma for the Obama administration as it struggles to pass health care reforms and other priorities, including a climate change bill championed by Jones.

Jones has consistently leaned on racially charged language, pointing the finger at "white polluters and the white environmentalists" for "steering poison" to minority communities, as he makes the case for lifting up low-income and minority communities with better environmental policy.

A declared "communist" during the 1990s, Jones once associated with a group that looked to Mao Zedong as an inspiration.

Jones' exceptional past is reminiscent of associations noted during the presidential campaign, when then-Sen. Barack Obama doggedly fended off claims that he was tied to radicals and overzealous activists.

But with now-President Obama entering the perhaps trickiest phase of his young presidency -- building the kind of consensus around health care reform that President Clinton could not -- a divisive figure could prove disfiguring.

"In this environment, I think the Obama administration should be very careful of its dealings with anybody who can be labeled communist accurately," said Christopher C. Hull, an adjunct government professor at Georgetown University who runs the public affairs firm Issue Management.

"That's just going to play to the political sensibility that those on the right have that the Obama administration is socialist, literally socialist. ... It is unwise to bring in people who actually do label themselves socialist or communist."

Jones has mellowed considerably since the '90s. In some respects, he is about as mainstream as environmentalists come -- with recognition streaming in from high places over the past few years.

He's won plaudits from former Vice President Al Gore, who declared, "I love Van Jones," in an interview with The New Yorker.

Actor Leonardo DiCaprio penned the write-up on Jones when the presidential adviser was featured in Time magazine's 100 "Most Influential People."

"Steadily -- by redefining green -- Jones is making sure that our planet and our people will not just survive but also thrive in a clean-energy economy," DiCaprio wrote.

Jones was also named one of the magazine's "Heroes of the Environment 2008." He's earned a slew of other recognitions from other publications and institutions. He was even named one of Salon.com's "Sexiest Men Living" in late 2008.

Plus he's the author of the 2008 New York Times best-seller, "The Green Collar Economy."

Now a member of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, his book's central premise is that environmentalism and green jobs can lift up the economy and lift up low-income Americans.

He is the founder of Green for All, which focuses on creating green jobs in poor areas. He helped the city of Oakland pass a "green jobs corps" program in 2007. Green jobs is also one platform of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, which he co-founded in 1996.

He also co-founded Color of Change, an advocacy group that focuses on black issues, after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

In Thursday's statement, Jones addressed his work current work.

"My work at the Council on Environmental Quality is entirely focused on one goal: building clean energy incentives which create 21st century jobs that improve energy efficiency and use renewable resources."

Jones' history has drifted between mainstream activism surrounding issues of race, poverty and the environment, and activity he has described as "revolutionary."

Originally from Tennessee, Jones graduated from Yale Law School in 1993. But his life took a turn after he was swept up in arrests during a rally following the Rodney King verdict.

Jones has claimed he was monitoring police activity at the time, but that he met people in jail who changed his thinking.

"I met all these young radical people of color -- I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was like, 'This is what I need to be a part of,'" he said in a 2005 interview with the East Bay Express. Jones told the newspaper he stayed in San Francisco, and for the next 10 years worked with a lot of the people he met in jail. Months after the King verdict came down, Jones said, "I was a communist."

At the time he became involved with a group called Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), which described itself as committed to Marxist and Leninist ideas. He also started putting pressure on police in San Francisco, monitoring and drawing attention to allegations of police brutality. He was quoted accusing the police department of "killing black people."

He became a vocal critic of the federal government during the Bush administration. He and groups he was associated with assailed "U.S. imperialism" after the Sept. 11 attacks and called the assumption that an Arab group was responsible a "rush to judgment." He later co-signed the petition calling for an investigation into government involvement in the attacks.

For conservative critics, he has -- as Hull warned -- served as a ready target.

"You can't nominate all of these czars ... and then say, well, you know, I'm not responsible for all these people," said conservative commentator Ann Coulter. "People will start to blame Obama."

The White House has voiced great confidence in Jones, announcing in March that the "green jobs visionary" would in his new role advance the goal of improving energy efficiency and tapping renewable resources.

2009-09-02T03:47:00.001-07:00

2009-09-02T03:45:00.000-07:00

2009-09-02T03:37:00.000-07:00

White Women Don't be a Victim !

2009-08-24T22:20:00.001-07:00

Every White woman out there needs to know these things, learn it, practice it and don't be a victim.

Vital Striking points of the body : where to hit right Part 1

Where to strike right to get an advantage against your attacker?

Pressure / vital / striking points are those areas of the body where a strike will have a most effect on. It is in the best interest of those who want an extra advantage over their opponents or where you may have a low chance of winning the battle. Using these techniques can help you overthrow the opponent and rescue yourself.

There are around forty vital points that are taught in karate where properly struck can render the person unconscious or even death. Here are some of these pressure points which are easy to locate and hit.

Facial Areas

Temple: Opposing to popular belief, the skull is not thin in this area, it is only flatter. A strong blow on the temple can cause disorientation or unconsciousness. It is because the direct shock to the brain which causes unconsciousness, intense pain, seizures, and in extreme cases, death. The best way is to strike with your palm heel, hammer fist, elbow, or knee.

Eyeballs: any strike to the eyes can do a lasting injury. You can use this as your last resort if your life is in danger or under serious body harm. You need to be careful and not use this target when playing with someone or with casual fight. This can easily cause permanent blindness for your opponent. The best types of strike are clawing, finger jabs, or stabbing.

Base of nose: The base of the nose meets the forehead between the eyes. There are several popular myths about this strike. Striking someone on the base of the nose does not shove his brain to the brain. The benefit of striking at this point can be your opponent to draw back, eyes water or swell, nose bleeding profusely can be a very good psychological advantage. Exceptionally strong blow can fracture the nasal bone and lay the person unconscious.

Base of the Jaw: this is a easy to hit target and has several desirable effects. Ranging from snapping the head back and get him unbalanced and fall to breaking the bone or teeth and can make the person unconscious in severe cases. Boxers often use this technique for their knockout blows. Use palm heel, straight on punches, upper cut, elbows or chicken wrist for best effects.

Hinge of the Jaw: A cluster of delicate nerves flow near each ear and the hinge of the jaw. You can use your fingers with a sharp jabbing motion. It wont cause any lasting injury but it will cause your attacker enough pain and loosen his hold on you.

Under the jaw: straight under the jaw you can find a ‘V’ shaped area which too has a cluster of nerves that can cause intense pain if hit with force. Squeeze and push up against the bone. Use this technique while rescue, it would have similar effect to the previous one.

Front Of Torso

Larynx (Adam’s apple): this part of the throat is very vulnerable; it is at the front of the throat and easy target to hit. When hit properly with average force this strike can cause serious injury. Power blows can cause difficulty breathing, damage the windpipe, bleeding or even death. Almost any solid strike can be effective in this area, but ridge hands, punches, four finger punches, chop, elbow and kick might hurt more.

Base of throat: This area is also very delicate. This spot is a ‘V’ kind of notch located where the collarbones come together. Pressure can be applied on it using fingers or thumb. For sharp attacks use finger fists, finger jabs and spear hands.

Zyphoid process and solar plexus: zyphoid plexus is the small tip which extends ahead the bottom of breastbone into what is generally known as breadbasket (solar plexus). When struck with powerful blow, it can break off and cause injury. Besides pain, there can be a possible puncturing of lungs if struck right and hard. Try using knees, kicks, palm heel, elbows and forward punches.

Inguinal area: This area is highly sensitive and is at the upper, inside thigh halfway to the knee. There are bunch of nerves at this place which makes it an ideal striking point. Pinches, kicks and punches can be used to cause pain or even make the leg go numb. This technique is very useful for tackling situations where you get caught from behind. Move your hips slightly to a side and pinch hard. Even a light pinch can cause bruising and make the opponent jump away loosing you and start rubbing the area to relieve his pain.

In total, there are more than fifty pressure points in human body which are termed very vulnerable. For a complete resource for all the hit points, you may consider reading:

Karate-Do Kyohan – The Master Text by Gichin Funakosi.

Though it is an old book, it is very informative and worthwhile.

Self Defense Street Fighting Part 2

What exactly is Street Fighting?

The term Street fighting can be used to denote extremely spontaneous, violent, hand to hand fighting in public places. This type of violence is usually intended to result in injury and submission but not indented to result in death. Although deaths have known to inadvertently occur. Street Fighting often results from a dispute and can stem from group association, harassment, or bullying. Violent incidents involving firearms are not usually called street fights. Other types of violence such as domestic violence, riots, war, and terrorism cannot be termed as Street Fighting.

First of all, there is no one sure shot Self Defense Street Fighting tip that will always work in every situation. And if someone is going to meet someone to fight, this is no longer self defense. The best Self Defense Street Fighting tip is not to fight at all. If a fight can really be avoided then it should be avoided at all costs, and everyone wins. That's the best Self Defense Street Fighting tip to anyone. The verbal and spacial Self Defense Street Fighting tips are the best way known to stop a potential fight from happening in the first place.

But regardless of the above tip there are many Self Defense Street fighting classes where most instructors will cover basic techniques against a club, knife, gun and a much larger assailant. Unless the many Self Defense Street fighting class is an ongoing martial arts class, covering more than one assailant often isn't feasible.

We have tried to cover some of the most common Self Defense Street fighting tips:

Self Defense Street Fighting Tip no. 1

If you are faced with an unavoidable confrontation and you see a way out, take it. Run like hell to safety. Shout at the top of your voice to attract attention. It is rare that any attacker would risk being caught if you are able to attract attention. And after all there is no shame in avoiding a needless confrontation and living another day. In most cases Discretion is better than valor as it certainly much better than being dead or being raped.

Self Defense Street Fighting Tip no. 2

If your attacker is standing in front of you, then try placing your the heel of your hand under your attackers chin and use the other hand to hold the back of their head or try to pull their hair as hard as possible. Then try to push up on the chin and twist their head to your right. If your attacker already has their back towards you then you know where to kick the hardest and make them fall. As soon as they fall climb on them and make sure they are unable to get up. Try to hit them with some heavy objects that may be lying around so they are unable to recover quickly and make a run for it. Remember avoiding too much direct contact is always better than a direct confrontation.

Self Defense Street Fighting Tip no. 3

If you are able to get hold of the attacker's hand, then twist the fingers back and apply as much pressure as possible. Then kick on the attackers groin area. Put all the strength in your kick. This will give to much need time to run as the attacker recovers from the pain.

Self Defense Street Fighting Tip no. 4

Always try to target the weakest area of the attacker such as their eyes, neck, throat, knees or the groin area. Make use of the heavy objects lying around as weapons.

Self Defense Street Fighting Tip no. 5

Be calm don't go into hysterics. There is no honor among thieves or street gangs. Don't give them a chance to hurt you.

Remember the finer details of self defense street fighting:
Do not hesitate to hit them hard.
Do not hesitate to run away from the situation.
Do not hesitate to ask for help from the bystanders if there are any.
Do not hesitate to yell and invite attention.

Most important thing about Self Defense Street fighting tactics is to remember you are not there to fight, you are fighting to survive.

Pressure Points for Self Defense Part 3

There are several pressure points on a person's body that you should become well aware of. In the even that you ever need to defend yourself attacking these pressure points can provide you with a good chance of the odds turning in your favor.

While you usually won't see individuals who are engaged in a street fight or a bar fight using pressure points they do have their purpose. For example a woman who is overpowered by a man or a child who is overpowered by an adult can use them to give them a few moments to escape.

You might be wondering just how effective a pressure point can be under such circumstances. Here is one you can try on yourself so that you can see how effective they really can be. This pressure point tactic is quick simple to perform and it is also very powerful. Many perpetrators will leave the scene after it has been used because of the element of surprise it has on them.

Place the fingertips of your four fingers lengthwise on your other wrist. Make sure they are across your blood vessels. Place your thumb on the backside of the wrist at the same time. Press down on them as hard as you can. In just a few seconds you will start to feel the hand going numb because the amount of blood flowing to it has slowed. If you apply this tactic to someone else they will instinctively let go of you with that hand.

In order for pressure point tactics to work you have to remain calm. This way you can focus on performing the various techniques accurately. If you aren't able to perform them accurately you could end up injuring yourself or the situation at hand could continue to escalate.

Self Defense Class for Woman Part 4

Continued from Self Defense for Women

The most important tip here would be to check if there are any Self Defense Class for Woman available at a local police department or gym. The best Self Defense Class for Woman and self defense tips can be imparted by your local police department.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 8
Criminals can look very innocent or if a person looks quite honest doesn't mean he will not have animal instincts within him. Not being able to identify a potential attacker might get you raped or even killed. Ted Bundy, the serial killer, was good-looking, well educated man, who always played on the sympathies of unsuspecting women. He walked with a cane, or a limp, and often asked "for help" into his vehicle or with his vehicle, which is when he abducted his next victim.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 9
It is sometimes much better to carry self defense equipments such as a can of pepper spray or mace An attacker's eyes are their most vulnerable weakness and spraying them with pepper spray can give you much needed valuable time to escape.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 10
Always carry your keys with you. Keys can be used as weapons when held through your fingers in a fist or poking them in to the attackers eyes.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 11
If the laws in your state allow carrying stun guns or small pistols make sure to carry them. Use these weapons discreetly; try to threaten your attacker with these at first. Sometimes an attacker might leave you rather than risking injury.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 12
Always have a good quality security system installed in your house and please do not forget to leave them on. You never know when they would come in use.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 13
Make it a point to visit banks or ATMs during the day and try to choose a populated area while visiting these spots. It is nothing better for a criminal than targeting a woman coming out of a bank or using ATM.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 14
Make a intelligent choice of where you park your vehicles and make sure the area is very well populated, very well lighted and very close to your destination.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 15
While traveling long distances make sure you have a mobile phone handy. In case your vehicle breaks down do not accept help from any strangers, make a call to a 24 hour road side assistance. Do not ask for lifts and call your relatives and immediately inform them of your current location. Never get into a car with strangers.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 16
This tip is very well advertised. Do not let any strangers into your home, do not keep your house doors open for strangers to barge in. Use common sense while opening the door; you never know who rang the door bell.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 17
If you're out at a bar, do not drink too much alcohol. If you are out on a date with someone you really do not know then use discretion while drinking. Ask for non alcoholic drinks if you are not with your close personal friends.

Self Defense Class for Woman tip no. 18
Remember your life is too precious, more precious than any of your personal belongings. Always be willing to give up possessions to save your life. Never get into a car with kidnappers.

Self Defense Tactics Part 5

There are rules for people to follow when using self defense tactics. Here are six tactics that will help you defend yourself:

Self Defense Tactics no. 1
Know what the law is – Most states have assault laws that state if you threaten to your attacker with the words such as "I will kick your ass" or respond to such a threat with "go ahead and try, let me see what you can do", even you will be charged as a participant in the fight. Therefore it is much better to know what the law states rather then having your own interpretation of self defense. For people who resort to self defense tactics could find themselves charged with assault and even sued for compensation by their burglars.

Self Defense Tactics no. 2
React Quickly – When confronted by strangers you have limited choices either Fight of Flee. You must know this in advance to prepare yourself as much as you can. Will you run or will you stand the ground? What if the assailant is armed? Condition your mind to react with "if this is the case then I will do this".

Self Defense Tactics no. 3
Keep cool and have presence of mind – To disarm an intruder or an assailant you need great presence of mind and skill. Even highly trained soldiers who are seldom trained to kill cannot always pull the trigger in anger. So always keep a cool head.

Self Defense Tactics no. 4
Hit him - Hit him hard – If you decide to hit him then you have to go for it 110 percent. You have to finish what you started. If you cannot frighten him off then at least you have to disarm him or hit him until he cannot move. If he is determined to beat the hell out of you and you hurt him slightly, he will come back on you like a wounded animal.

Self Defense Tactics no. 5
Use surrounding objects as Missiles – Don't worry if you do not have any self defense equipments such as a pepper spray or stunt guns. Use whatever you can find. Many household objects can be used as defensive weapons. The kitchen is particularly filled with such self defense objects. Use objects that are heavy or anything that is made up of glass. Any sharp-ended object, such as wooden spoon, a pen or a toothbrush, can also be turned into a weapon of self defense.

Self Defense Tactics no. 6
Use your mind and body – If the assailant comes directly for you, use everything you have and all the objects near you. Poke, jab, strike at his eyes, put fingers in nose, press his throat as hard as you can. Thumbs gouged into corners of eyes and fingers pushed up noses as far as they will go are particularly effective. Bend fingers backwards, quickly, until they snap - this is more easily achieved than might be thought.

Women's Self Defense - A Kick in the Nuts Part 6

While it is against the law to attack someone else the law does hold the position that it is acceptable to defend yourself against someone else. For self defense to be justified the individual must believe they are in danger of being immediately hurt by the other individual. In addition the amount of force used to fight back must only be enough to prevent that danger.

Women are often at the mercy of men because they are stronger when it comes to being the victim. Sometimes it is by someone they know and other times it is from a complete stranger. The question that comes into play is when are the actions of the man enough to justify self defense from the woman.

Should the stand up to the problem immediately and let it be well known they won't tolerate the behavior? Others believe it is only after the man has touched the woman inappropriately that she has the right to engage in self defense. Many women find that kicking a man in the nuts is definitely enough to get a clear message across. Is this measure self defense or an act of violence?

The debate on this one is very heated. For example some individuals believe that if a woman goes to a bar without a man to protect her she gets what she gets. If she doesn't want men hitting on her then she needs to go home and drink in private. On the flip side of that coin are those women who believe they should be able to go anywhere they want without being harassed by men. If they tell them they want to be left alone that should be the end of the conversation.

There are some situations though where women have to use any line of self defense they can. If that includes kicking a man in the nuts then so be it. Some of these situations include domestic violence, being raped, kidnappings, and being mugged. Most men will fall to their knees when kicked there no matter what weapon they hold or how buff they are. It can offer the woman time to get away and seek help from the situation.

Womens Self Defense Part 7

All women live with a certain level of risk of violent crime. Statistics have shown that 21 years old woman has a 1 in 4 chance of experiencing a violent crime in her lifetime. But some women are at an unusually high risk of serious assault or even murder. Women face death not just from perfect strangers whom they don't even know but even from abusive ex-spouses or ex-boyfriends. Most of these tragic deaths could have been prevented if the women were trained with self defense for women.

In the wake of increasing crime and murder especially we have included some tips on how to reduce risk of being attacked and how to respond if something bad happens.

Self Defense for Women tip no. 1
Elbow is the strongest part of your body. If the attacker is in close contact do not hesitate to use it.

Self Defense for Women tip no. 2
When confronted by a robber asking you for your valuables for example your hand bag, necklace or watch, do not hand over the items in their hand, instead throw them in some other direction. Chances are that the attacker may be more interested in your valuables rather you and may go for the valuables instead of you. Run away from the scene like hell if he opts for the valuables.

Self Defense for Women tip no. 3
In case you are kidnapped and thrown into the trunk of the car. Kick at the back of the trail lights to dislodge them completely and then stick out your hand from the opening so created and wave like crazy. The attacker driving the car might never notice it but the passer bys or other motorists will.

Self Defense for Women tip no. 4
Never sit alone in a car with your passenger side door open especially at night or isolated places. The attacker might be watching every single move you make and this might give him the perfect opportunity to get in on the passenger side, pull out a gun and put it on your head then tell you where to go. As soon as you get into the car lock all the doors and windows and leave.

Self Defense for Women tip no. 5
A few notes about getting into your car in a parking lot, or parking garage:
Be aware: look around you, look into your car, at the passenger side floor, and in the back seat.
If you are parked next to a big van, enter your car from the passenger door. Most serial killers attack their victims by pulling them into their vans while the women are attempting to get into their cars.
Look at the car parked on the driver's side of your vehicle, and the passenger side. If a male is sitting alone in the seat nearest your car, you may want to walk back into the mall, or work, and get a guard/policeman to walk you back out. IT IS ALWAYS BETTER TO BE SAFE THAN SORRY. And better paranoid than dead.
Self Defense for Women tip no. 6
Make use of the elevators and not the stairs. Stairwells are horrible places to be alone and the honey moon destination for criminals.

Self Defense for Women tip no. 7
If the attacker threatens you with a gun and you are not being held by him, then it is always better to run like hell. A moving target is much harder to hit than a stationary target. Most attackers might not shoot at all and even if they shoot they are most likely to miss the vital organs.

What is Self Defense? Part 8

Self Defense quite literally means using whatever means necessary to quickly end a situation that offers you grievous bodily injury. So taking evasive actions out of danger is self defense. Running away from a potentially dangerous situation for your is self defense. The best self defense is not putting yourself in danger in the first place. But this is not always possible.

Legally self defense is the use of force is justified when a person reasonably believes that it is necessary for the defense of oneself or another against the immediate use of unlawful force. However, a person must use no more force than appears reasonably necessary in the circumstances.

Self Defense is always geared towards one thing only i.e. ending an immediate physical threat directed towards you or your loved once. But bear in mind that self defense is not intended towards ending a perceived emotional threat that might hurt your feelings. Self Defense cannot be used to prove your superiority over others.

Self defense begins with self respect, knowledge of your rights and the determination and ability to protect those rights. We can learnself-defense against verbal and physical assaults by becoming aware of the facts about violence against women, by becoming assertive and skilled in physical self-defense.

Fighting or inciting violence is illegal but self defense is legal. If you are strolling in a garden and a few armed people come up to you and threaten you with your life and ask to give up all your belongings then defending yourself with any means possible is self defense. But on the other hand calling people with bad names or using foul verbal language to prove your dominance or inciting an attack on you first so that you get a chance to retaliate is not self defense.

Self Defense can only be in a situation when where you are honestly trying to withdraw from physical danger which occurred without your provocation.

In self defense your body language counts for a lot. The moment you stand up for your rights, walk and shout with authority, people think twice about attacking you. This can apply to anyone, even the elderly or women. If somebody has breached your privacy, the boundary of your property, your voice if used legally and your bold presence can be enough to deter them. But always mind your language while shouting. You could be withdrawing from a situation while calling bad names to your potential attacker will not be considered as being attacked without provocation. That would still constitute escalating the problem situation. You were physically backing off but you were still verbally attacking. In fact in some states have laws that state that you cannot use certain terms and then claim that you were attacked without provocation.

Clear thinking and decisive action are needed during any confrontation.

Tai Chi Self Defense Part 9

Tai Chi Self Defense Chinese martial arts, merges the key elements of striking, grappling and the use of traditional weapons. Tai Chi also focuses on evasion, footwork and strategy very important elements ofself defense. The combination of evasion, footwork and strategy make it a very ideal martial art especially for women. Tai Chi is a centuries old Chinese discipline for health, relaxation, balance, flexibility, strength, meditation, self defense and self-cultivation. Tai Chi is both a healthy exercise as well as a unique form self defense system. Tai Chi can be practiced for recreation as well as to increase body's strength, flexibility, vitality, and mental awareness well into old age.

For many, Tai Chi is also known as the "internal arts" because it focuses the movement of "chi" within the body.

Chi is nothing more than energy within the body, not much different from the blood that pumps in our veins or the electrical signals that pass through our synapses that keeps us alive.

Grappling training is important for ladies in teaching them how to use their strength in a skillful way to manipulate a heavier male opponent. From the Tai Chi Chuan point of view, skill is not just restricted by the size of the body, strength, or natural quickness. Intense practice, rather than raw talent, is more important than in other forms of martial art. The outstanding characteristic of Tai Chi Chuan is that its practice centers on the slow development of a tenacious strength that enables the body not only to withstand punches or kicks of great force but also to generate tremendous power of its own. The root of this strength is not in the muscles and bones, but in the organs, the tendons, and the mind. Unlike muscular power, this tenacious power has no measurable limits, and there are many ways it can be used against the opponent. Tai Chi movements are based on self defense techniques even tough the movements are done very slowly. Tai Chi is a martial art and not merely a form of exercise or meditation. The practice of "pushing hands" is important for the self defense techniques of Tai Chi.

Force from the opponent is never met head-on. Rather, the practitioner of Tai Chi Chuan will subtly try to neutralize and divert on coming energy and turn it back against the opponent. The greater the force with which the opponent attacks, the more severe will be the returning blow or push. This skill of "borrowing energy" is one of many Tai Chi Chuan techniques structured around the basic principle of "tenacious strength".

Self Defense Protection Part 10

Self Defense Protection tip no. 5
You must react quickly: Remember that attacks occur and attacks occur very suddenly. You do not have time to think or contemplate what just happened and you're your best ally is to react as quickly as possible. And since the attacks occur so suddenly, you are always left in a very disadvantageous position, if you are not prepared to react. This is especially true if you rely solely on some form of weapon for your defense. Pepper spray, stun guns and firearms are useless if you can't get to them to use them instantly and when you need them the most. So try to anticipate dangerous situations in advance and prepare yourself to take quick action.

Self Defense Protection tip no. 6
Almost anything can be a weapon: When confronted by an adverse situation make full use of your environment and use the very many objects lying near you or objects with you. You can use many everyday objects as a weapon. A pen or pencil can be used as a dagger, or a phone or lamp could be used as a club. Anything that is harder, sharper or more resilient than your hands can be used effectively. Any thing that is heavy can be used as a missile and hurdled towards your attacker. Attackers are also human beings like you, and they also fear being attacked the same way you do. Raining heavy things that are sure to injure them will scare the hell out of them. Try throwing away from them to begin with if this dose not deter them then try to throw things directly at their faces and let them know that you are serious and would injure them if taken lightly.

Self Defense Protection tip no. 7
When attacked...attack back: It is said the best defense is attack. Attackers hate being attacked as much as you do. They fear being injured as much as you do. You need to make your attacker worry about their own safety, instead of how they're going to hurt you. You may use every part of your body to attack them. Do not forget your nails, fingers and teeth can inflict enough injury to deter a determined attacker. The best places to attack are the most weaker points on the attackers body, target his eyes, groin area, knees or neck / throat. Do not hesitate to attack since it will only give your attacker more time to formulate their own attack and you may not get any other chance. Overwhelm your assailant, trying to momentarily disable them, so you can escape!

Self Defense Protection tip no. 8
The element of surprise: Second to awareness, surprise is perhaps the most important element of effective self defense. Using it to your advantage can give you a devastating edge in a confrontation. The number of deceptive counterattacks is limited only by your imagination. For example, you might pretend to be passive, by appearing to submit to your assailants wishes, only to attack them when they least expect it. You might also try to talk to your attacker, then suddenly throw something at their face - and run. In any case, it will be your ability to stay as calm as possible, while you keep thinking, that will make the difference.

Self Defense Tip Part 11

Self Defense Tip no. 7
Pull the assailants hair - Run your fingers across the assailants scalp and grab a handful of hair in your fist. This is a simple Self Defense Tip that causes a great deal of pain and should distract an aggressive assailant. Contrary to popular belief, the groin is a predictable target and should not be aimed at first.

Self Defense Tip no. 8
Force the assailant on the ground – Do your best to force the assailant on to the ground. Once he is on the ground, take control of the situation; do not let him get up.

Self Defense Tip no. 9
Shout as loudly as possible – Your throat can be your best hope. Shout as loudly as you can. Make sure your voice can reach as far as you can, there is always the hope that somebody might answer your distress calls.

Self Defense Tip no. 10
Confuse your attacker – Try to move in a triangle rather in a straight line. Changing the distance between you and your attacker confuses him. Move forward when the attacker is throwing a flurry of blows on you. At this time the attacker is under the impression that you will be moving backward to defend your self. But of you move forward with a few of your own aggressive blows this would confuse the attacker and he may start moving backward giving you a advantage.

Self Defense Tip no. 11
Don't let embarrassment or fear keep you from running the scene – If you are unable to take control of the situation it is best advised to flee the scene. If you have a chance to run, run as fast as you can, don't forget to throw things on your attacker as you run.

Self Defense Tip no. 12
To summarize - the best self defense tips is to keep a cool mind, take control of the situation, if the moves above are carried out effectively you will be in a position to dictate the situation. Always remember that no one has the right to harm you or the ones you love. If it does happen, and you aren't mentally prepared to deal with it, you will most likely become frozen in fear. The best way to avoid this is to develop a survival mind set. Imagine yourself in a dangerous situation and visualize what actions you might take to survive and escape, the key is to address your fears before you are confronted with them. While it is unpleasant to visualize yourself as the victim of a rape, robbery or assault, it's necessary to prepare the mind to deal with the trauma. Preparation (while you're still in a safe environment) is the key.

Self Defense Education Part 12

Self Defense Education or Self Defense Awareness is very important factor that could save your or your loved ones lives. People who were attacked and have survived there attacks always advocate this fact, most of the people who survived the attack report that could do so as they were aware of their surroundings or they knew how to handle the situation because they had read about it somewhere.

Some self defense education tips that could come handy are given below:

Self Defense Education tip no. 1
Awareness is the key: Increasing your personal awareness is an integral part of crime perception, and perhaps the single most important element of effective self defense education. An awareness of the reality of crime and violence, as well as an awareness of your environment, are the keys to your self defense education. Being aware does mean you to involve paranoia. What this simple means is that if you're out late at night, perhaps a little paranoia is a good thing. Just use good common sense and remember to pay attention to what's happening around you, and you will go a long way towards keeping yourself safe, in an increasingly hostile world.

Self Defense Education tip no. 2
Always trust your instincts: Learn to listen to your inner self. A person inside you is always alerting you about your surroundings. If something tells you that something is wrong take the advice and do exactly the opposite of what you were about to do. You should be always be prepared to take action (if it's necessary) to get out of the situation or away from that person as fast as possible.

Self Defense Education tip no. 3
Avoid presenting a victim profile: Just like the animal, criminals always pick out the weakest and the most vulnerable. When in public places always walk straight, keep you head high and keep a nice confident posture. Criminals prey on the weak or unsuspecting, and usually avoid people who are aware of what's going on and might put up a fight. Watch strangers in their eye and judge their next move. Anyway pushing himself too close to you is always not a good sign and move away. Doing so his tells the predator that you are seeing him coming. Without the element of surprise, they will likely pass you up for someone who'll put up less of a fight.

Self Defense Education tip no. 3
Lights, people and noise: These are the things that increase the likelihood of the criminals being seen or caught so they are naturally like to avoid these. Therefore, whenever possible travel with a companion and in open more populated areas, especially during the nights. Stay away from the dark areas or the isolated places where criminals are most likely to advantage of you, especially if you are alone.

Self Defense Education tip no. 4
Your first priority is to run: When faced with a adverse situation remember that your first priority should be to run and not give a fight. Obviously, the best thing is not being there in the first place. But if you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time then do not hesitate to calculate your escape routes.

Some Unarmed Self-Defense Techniques Part 13

If you have ever worried about how you would handle a threatening situation without a weapon. There are many great self defense techniques you can use depending on the situation.

You can do some damage to the perpetrator if you know where on the hands and feet to attack them. Both have plenty of smaller bones and some that are quite strong so just getting in a few techniques at the right place is going to be very powerful.

Too many people plan on using their hands to fight off a perpetrator. What will you do if they have you securely held by both of your arms? You can use your feet and your legs to help you break free. Regardless of the direction the perpetrator has you facing you may be able to break bones in their feet.

The heel of your foot is the strongest bone in your body. Use it to attack areas on the legs and feet of the perpetrator. You don't want to use other parts of your own foot because if you injure them it will be extremely difficult for you to run away once you are able to break loose.

To get plenty of force behind the action, raise your knee up as high as you can. Slam it down with all your force so that the heel of your foot hits the perpetrator before any other part of your body does. If your back is to the person bring your legs up behind you like a mule does before they kick.

If you have on boots or high heels the kick will be even more effective. However it should be forceful enough to do some damage regardless of the type of shoes you are wearing. This type of kick can easily damage or even break a knee cap. If you are able to ram your head backwards at the same time you kick. You can bust open their nose or lips doing this.

Many men are expecting a kick in the groin so they will hold you so it can't be done. What they won't be expecting though is for you to reach out with your hand and pinch the area as hard as you can. If you can't reach the groin area then go for the inside of the thighs as close as you can to the testicles. It will be very painful for them indeed.

Some people worry about the amount of injury they will be doing to themselves if they perform such unarmed self defense techniques. While you may experience some pain or bruising for a few days it is much better than the alternative. You may end up being robbed, beaten, raped, or even killed. The longer the perpetrator has you under his control the more risk you have of suffering from such fates.

It is important that you try to remain calm because you may only get one chance to make your move. Don't get into a hurry and don't be afraid to go for it. In most instances you will end up suffering more from an attack if you don't fight them then if you do all you can to end the attack before it has gone very far. Most perpetrators are looking for easy victims. If they learn that you are going to be a fighter they will likely take off.

While self defense sprays and tools are very effective you can't always count on being about to have them available when you need them. Knowing different self defense techniques you can use that require only your body is a great way to make sure you are able to defend yourself if a situation does ever come your way.

Self Defense Laws Part 14

Self defense involves being able to incorporate various tactics to protect yourself. This can be using your body or a variety of different weapons designed specifically for such purposes. There are some laws surrounding self defense that you should familiarize yourself with. Otherwise you could end up participating in acts that can get you into trouble with the law.

In once instance a blind man with a martial arts background was approached by someone who had made a lifelong career out of robbing other people. He quickly learned he had picked the wrong individual to rob on this particular day though. The man was able to flip the robber over his back and onto the ground. The robber died from this as the result of a broken neck.

The blind man soon found himself in the middle of a frenzy. While he could have been charged with various criminal and civil statutes he never was because it was believed he acted strictly out of self defense. Had his actions not been provoked by the robber then they would never have taken place. However incidents like this take place all the time in the United States. Some of the victims soon find themselves sharing a cell with the same type of criminal that approached them in the first place.

The laws on self defense are often left open to interpretation though and that is what results in victims finding themselves on one side or the other of the law after the ordeal has taken place. The laws state self defense can only be introduced when the individual feels their life or the life of others is in immediate danger. The amount of force used to control the situation has to be reasonable as well.

In most instances the decision to pursue charges or to consider the act self defense depends on the laws in the jurisdiction where they incident took place. This is important because the laws where you were at the time of the incident may be very different than those in the town you reside in.

Many states take a look at each one of these cases on an individual basis. They look at the information of what a reasonable person would do in such as situation. However even this can be an area where you can't always be objective. Let's take a look at the example above again.

How do you judge such a situation? If you say it isn't reasonable that a person would be able to flip the robber over their shoulder and cause them to break their neck then the victim may be viewed as a criminal. However, if you view the situation as a person with martial arts training would reasonably react the same way in a similar situation then the actions fall into the category of self defense.

Another area that is looked at is the issue of deadly force. In the instance of the blind man again he did not use excessive force. It was an act of nature that the robber landed the way he did. However if you repeatedly shoot someone or your beat them to prevent them from taking an action against you it may be considered excessive force. The question that remains to be answered though is how much force is enough to protect yourself and how much is excessive?

While there are laws in place relating to self defense the majority of them are very vague and open to interpretation. This makes such laws very complex to decipher, especially in a court of law. The way such laws are interrupted can vary by state and even by court. If you find yourself dealing with such a situation you need to place your future into the hands of a well qualified attorney who specializes in the area of self defense.

How Senior Citizens Defend Themselves with their Canes Part 15

Many senior citizens live alone and they aren't as strong as they once were. To help them be as independent as possible many senior citizens live alone, making them a prime target for criminals. Seniors can defend themselves with the help of specially designed canes for that purpose. Quality cans make out of solid wood can come in quite handy for fighting off a criminal.

Some of the various self defense canes also come with a free DVD or VHS for the senior citizen to review. This is a great way for them to learn some self defense techniques that are sure to leave the criminal wondering what they hell just happened. Senior citizens are often considered to be easy prey but that doesn't have to be the case.

Cane Masters is a leader in the industry when it comes to developing canes for self defense. They were introduced by Mark Shuey who holds a black belt in the areas of Tae Kwon Do, Hapkido, and Tang Soo Do. He also holds numerous titles in the area of Masters Weapons.

He has been developing self defense training methods with the cane for the past ten years. His years of marital arts training has allowed him to explore a variety of self defense techniques that can be done by a person with little strength but that have a substantial amount of power behind them.

His desire is to teach senior citizens that instead of viewing having to go through life with a cane as a sign of weakness it can actually be a valuable weapon for defending themselves. It is a better weapon that many others because it is already available and at your service. You don't have to try to get it out of your pocket or purse as you do with many other types of self defense weapons.

Self Defense Moves - Face, Throat, Ears and Groin Attacks Part 16

When it comes to being able to defend yourself against an attacker the sky is the limit. You should never stop to question your tactics or where you are hitting them, just keep on doing it. There are some good areas to aim for though including the face, throat, ears, and the groin.

If the individual has you in close proximity do all you can to claw at their face. You can scratch them, poke their eyes, put your fingers in their nose, anything that is going to get to let go of you for a moment and try to defend their face. If they only let go of you with one hand then go for other areas.

You can scratch at their throat but it will be more effective if you give them a good solid punch there instead. While this tactic can result in the perpetrator suffering damage to their esophagus or trachea you shouldn't be concerned. The amount of pressure you place there will hopefully take them by surprise and result in them letting you go. It will only take a few moments before they are gasping for air, and that will likely make them panic.

Many people don't realize how painful it can be to have your ears tormented. You can get to your perpetrator by scratching, pinching, or even biting at the ears. This is a good option if you are picked up and thrown over their shoulders.

Women learn early in life that hitting a man in the groin area can lead to extreme pain. It may be something they learn by accident when they see someone get hit there. Others are taught by their mothers and teachers to hit an attacker there and then run as fast as you can.

While this definitely is a good method of self defense it is one that everyone is aware of. That includes the attacker so they will most likely be expecting it. If possible use at least one of the other self defense moves listed here so you can kick them in the groin when they aren't expecting it. Men who are the victim of an attack by another man can try this technique as well. Men usually aren't expecting a kick in the groin to come from another male.

It is important to learn effective ways to defend yourself in these types of situations. While you may be able to use different weapons for self defense you can't always count one them being available. If you are caught off guard there is no way you can access them.

Learning ways to defend yourself using your body can provide you with the ability to reduce the severity of such incidents. Take the time to practice the techniques you learn on a regular basis so you can put them into action when it will really make a difference.

Don't depend on one technique to take care of the situation. As long as you have the element of surprise you have the upper hand. Keep the different self defense techniques coming and your perpetrator will not know what has come his way.
The moment you are able to get yourself free run for help. Leaving scratches on the face, arms, throat, and ears of the perpetrator will mean there is plenty of evidence to give away the struggle you were in. There is no way the perpetrator can pretend they weren't involved with such evidence.

Even if they aren't caught at the time of the incident it will likely take several days for such injuries to heal completely. If you have caused damage to the throat area the perpetrator will likely end up getting caught when they show up at the doctor's office or the emergency room for treatment.

When Can Guns be used as Self Defense? Part 17

In most states citizens can apply for a permit to carry a concealed gun with them. Many people do apply for such a permit because they definitely want to be able to defend themselves if the need should arise. There are plenty of citizens opposed to the idea though considering the number of people who end up using a gun to commit an act of violence rather than as a method of self defense.

There are strict laws about when guns can be used in self defense. You need to make sure you are aware of these guidelines because you definitely don't want to find yourself on the wrong side of the law. In most instances you can use a gun for self defense if it is registered and an approved weapon. You also have to feel like your life is in immediate danger and using a gun is the only way to protect yourself or others from that danger.

In some states the laws are more lenient. For example Colorado has a Make My Day Law that states it is legal to use a gun for self defense if someone breaks into your home. Even if you don't feel like you are in immediate danger you have the right to use the gun under such laws. There are some other guidelines that play into this as well though such as the gun being registered.

Guns can be a very valuable tool for defending yourself if you are educated about how to store them and how to use them. Hopefully you won't ever be faced with a serious situation where you feel it is necessary to use a gun on someone for self defense. However should that situation arise you need to feel confident that the laws will be on your side to support the decision you have made.

Obama mama: 6 lost months

2009-08-20T10:54:00.000-07:00

No documented record of whereabouts, activity leading up to baby's birth in '61

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106942

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106258

Obama's MySpace page: I'm 52 years old, not 48

2009-08-20T10:40:00.000-07:00

Would place president's birth during time Hawaii was a territory

If President Obama were indeed born in Hawaii, was it while the islands were a territory of the United States?

A new wrinkle in the dispute over his birth – and whether he is eligible to be president under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that the president be a "natural born" citizen – appeared today when Obama's official MySpace page declared his age is 52, thus placing his birth year at 1957 instead of 1961 as has been claimed.

That would mean he would have been born during the archipelago's time as a territory of the U.S., the islands' status from about 1900 until statehood in 1959.

The birth year also conflicts with campaign and other White House information that have discussed his 48th birthday this month.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107163

Some Vital -- And Very Ugly -- Facts You Ought to Know

2009-08-19T21:26:00.000-07:00

PRELIMINARY NOTE: Over the time period in which the essay below has been posted, the 'anti-racists' and other liberal types who have read it have basically offered two objections (or 'objections'): First, they claim that the cited facts are not true; second, they claim these facts constitute 'hate'; and third, they claim that the unpleasant facts, particularly those relating to blacks -- are not really due to any fault in blacks, but are rather due to the fault of 'racist' whites and their 'racist' system.

As to the first objection, I can assure you that the facts cited here are truly facts, and that they may be verified by checking the very large collection of articles in the Articles of Others section (accessible from the Home Page). These articles are arranged by subject matter and are carefully titled according to content -- conditions which should make it easy to verify any particular fact, usually with several sources.

As to the second objection, I will say just two things: (1) Ask not whether I am a hater; ask only whether I am RIGHT; and (2) There is nothing the matter with hate, provided only that it is directed against hateful things.
As to the third objection, this is not really an objection to the content of the essay, but rather an objection to the obvious conclusions which derive from the cited facts. The thrust of the objection is the claim that blacks' problems are due to 'social conditions' (presumably those caused by whites, such as 'racism'), and that "If only this, that or some other condition is brought about, then blacks would prove 'equal' to whites."

But if this claim had any credibility in times past, it has none now; for liberals have been playing the 'if only...' game for half a century, and blacks are still just as much losers as they ever were -- just as criminal, just as low-IQ, just as poor, just as violent, just as unmotivated, and all the rest.

In the last 50 years, blacks went from being discriminated AGAINST to being discriminated FOR (affirmative action, set-asides, quotas, etc), and now they are actually WORSE OFF than they were in the 50s: Altho some have 'made it' by affirmative action or living off white guilt (like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton), the special privileges and deferences granted to blacks have merely served to increase their dependency, their lack of motivation, their drug taking, their crime, and all the other bad things for which they are so well known, including especially their demands for yet MORE special privileges (Reparations, anyone?).
[End PRELIMINARY NOTE]
If you are like a lot of people, you believe that racism is wrong.

So let me tell you a couple of things I believe will surprise you.

FIRST, the 'racists' are RIGHT.
And SECOND, I can PROVE IT IN JUST ONE SENTENCE.

But first, allow me to introduce myself. My name is John "Birdman" Bryant. I am the author of 40 books, a member of the legendary high-IQ society Mensa, have had my works praised by many of the world's most distinguished men including Nobel prizewinners, and am listed in many of the standard biographical references, including Who's Who in America and Who's Who in the World. I also run a website (the one you are on) which is devoted, among other things, to breaking the embargo on information about race and related matters which the Establishment media have sought to suppress.

I said earlier that I could prove that the 'racists' are right in one single sentence. My proof stems from the fact that racial matters are never genuinely debated today, because the only thing you ever see in the major media is the politically-correct 'anti-racist' viewpoint. The 'other side' is never allowed to make its case, ie, THE 'RACIST' SIDE IS SUPPRESSED. And you sure as hell can't have a debate about race if one of the sides is never allowed to speak. So here is the one-sentence proof that the 'racists' are right:

THERE IS NO REASON TO SUPPRESS A VIEWPOINT UNLESS IT IS TRUE, because a false viewpoint can easily be combatted with facts and logic, while truth cannot be combatted except by lies which are vulnerable to refutation.
Or to put it another way, the 'racist' view HAS to be suppressed, because if it weren't, MOST PEOPLE WOULD BECOME 'RACISTS'!

So what is the 'racist' view? Very simply, it is one that takes the facts I cite below -- along with a lot of others -- into account.

* FACT: Blacks make up 12% of the population, yet are 50% of the prison population.

* FACT: This means that blacks commit NINE TIMES the crimes of whites. (That's NOT 9% -- it's 900%!) It means that if there were equal numbers of blacks and whites in our population, NINE OF EVERY TEN CRIMINALS WOULD BE BLACK. NOTE: Some have claimed that black crime is high because 'racist' cops target blacks for arrest and 'racist' judges heap convictions on innocent blacks; but statistics belie this:

Three of the cities highest in crime are Washington DC, New Orleans and Detroit; and yet the government of all these cities is in black hands; so clearly the cause of high crime in these cities is not 'racial targeting of blacks'. More generally, black crime is high WHEREVER you go; and it would be the world's most absurd conspiracy theory to suppose that the across-the-board high crime rates for blacks originated in a collusion of whites in every city and burg in the nation to target blacks and/or cook the books.

* FACT: If present demographic trends continue, whites will be a minority in America in only 50 years. Whites are already less than 50% of the population in California. Between blacks and Hispanics, whose crime rate is about 4 times that of whites, we can expect to see huge escalations in crime against whites as they become fewer in number and thus more vulnerable both physically and politically.

* FACT: 90% of all inter-racial crime is black-on-white (ie, committed BY blacks AGAINST whites).

* FACT: There are 20,000 black-on-white rapes every year in the US, but fewer than 100 white-on-black rapes.

* FACT: The majority of hate crimes are committed by blacks, in spite of the fact that blacks make up only 12% of the population, and in spite of the great reluctance of authorities to report hate crimes when they are committed by blacks. (That means that blacks commit VASTLY MORE hate crimes in proportion to their numbers than whites!)

* FACT: The average white IQ is 100; the average American black IQ is 85; the average African black IQ is 70 (borderline retarded). There has never been a civilization worthy of the name founded by blacks, and blacks have not even been able to retain the civilizations which have been created for them by whites ("white colonialism"). Note: Contrary to black propaganda, the ancient Egyptians were not black -- their sculptures, portraits and mummies all clearly show Caucasian features. Second note: Critics commonly claim that blacks score low on IQ tests because such tests are culturally biased. In fact, however, as black Prof Walter Williams has pointed out, blacks actually do BETTER on tests that are culturally biased.

* FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western country at one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France, Portugal and Germany. There are several possible explanations for this, including religious differences, the clannishness of Jews which tends to make them loyal to their own 'nation' rather than to their host country, and envy of Jewish wealth and success (the average Jewish IQ is 115, as far above white as white is above black).

* FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks, newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled by Jews.

* FACT: The major media incessantly harps on any white-on-black crime (such as the Jasper TX dragging), yet ignores the much greater number of black- on-white crimes which are equally horrific yet happen FAR MORE FREQUENTLY.

* FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by Wall Street Jews.

* FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'.

* FACT: One of the most distinguished black scholars in America, syndicated columnist Dr Thomas Sowell, has studied multiracial societies around the world and has observed that -- with the single exception of societies where one race is completely dominant over all others -- such societies simply do not work.

* FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remained in charge of the organization till 1970.

* FACT: The Reverend Dr Martin Luther King Jr took his instructions from a Jewish communist, plagiarized his doctoral dissertation, and was an adulterous womanizer who spent the evening prior to his assassination in bed with two white women. Yet King is the only single American to be honored with a national holiday.

* FACT: The 1954 Supreme Court decision which brought about school integration was based on deliberate misrepresentation of a supposedly- scientific study.

* FACT: Liberals and blacks claim that the reason for black failure is "discrimination"; and yet many other racial and ethnic groups have been discriminated against -- Chinese, Irish and Jews, for example -- and yet all except blacks have become successful within a generation or so.

* FACT: Most of the 'Orthodox Jewish version' of the Holocaust is false, (and in fact is significantly based on 'confessions' of Germans at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal obtained under torture), and numerous Jewish scholars have actually acknowledged this. (The stories acknowledged by Jewish scholars to be false include the existence of homicidal gas chambers, the use of Jewish skin for lampshade coverings and Jewish body fat for soap, and the assertion that there were 'Six Million' Jews killed by the nazis.) But questioning these widely-believed but false stories is illegal in most countries of the Western world, and 8,000 people are in jail in Germany alone for questioning these and similar dogmas. Can you figure out what powerful international ethnic group was responsible for causing these laws to be passed?

* FACT: Sympathy and guilt for the (largely false) story of the Holocaust has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion dollars to Israel by the German government. Furthermore, Jews everywhere continue to use the Holocaust as a tool for extracting money from gentiles, whether thru the movies (more than 400 have been made on this subject), Holocaust museums, 'reparations' (more than a billion from the Swiss, billions from German companies, etc) and the like. There is a saying widely used among Jews which goes, "There's no business like Shoah [Holocaust] business." Can you figure out why the Jewish establishment has been so eager to suppress questioning of the Holocau$$$t dogma?

* FACT: Israel is the only 'Western' country to legally sanction torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters. Furthermore, Israel forbids marriages of Jews to non-Jews, just like nazi Germany.

* FACT: Jewish political influence has been the principal force attempting to nullify our Constitution, and particularly the freedoms enjoyed under the Bill of Rights. For example, Jews have been the major force behind 'gun control' (ie, the attempt to nullify the Second Amendment), integration and affirmative action (to nullify freedom of association), 'hate crimes' (laying the foundation for suppressing freedom of speech), immigration (introducing large numbers of unassimilable nonwhites which will effectively destroy American culture and ideals), anti-militia statutes and similar efforts.

Personally, I find the above facts disturbing, and I would think that any rational person would also find them so. But what I find even more disturbing is the pattern which the above facts show, namely a clear and continuing program by Jews -- not all Jews, of course, but an effort clearly Jewish in nature -- to destroy American and Western society by such devices as communism, undermining the Constitution, manipulating the media, and fomenting racial strife with immigration, integration, multiculturalism, and anti-white policies such as affirmative action, all while extracting billions in 'guilt money' thru the Holocaust fraud. These facts, and the pattern which they show, need to be publicized as widely as possible; and yet the fact that the major media are in Jewish hands makes it extremely difficult to do so, not merely because there is no access to the media for such facts, but because the media have engaged in a program of conditioning people to disbelieve such facts because they are 'racist'.

A major purpose of my website is to provide documentation and discussion of the facts discussed here and a great many related ones. The problems entailed by these facts do not lend themselves to simple solutions, but their discussion is vital for the continued survival of America and that unique race -- the white race -- which built Western civilization. In fact, the resolution of these problems is critical to ALL races, because the modern world is based on the civilizing influence of Western culture, and its destruction will foredoom a return to barbarism.
In the few short months that my website has been up, I have had thousands of visitors as a result of word of mouth alone, and hundreds of other sites now link to mine. I invite you to hear the "other side" of the race question by reading the articles on this site. Copy and paste the link below to get to the home page and table of contents.

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Lbl/Lbl-VitalFactsYouNeedToKnow.html

The true meaning behind this anti-white hate group: NAACP

2009-08-19T21:17:00.000-07:00

N*GGERS Are Always Causing Problems

N*ggers Always Agitating Caucasian People

N*ggers Are Always Complaining Potheads

N*ggers Are Americas Crime Problem

National Association for the Advancement of Certain People

N*ggers, Aardvarks, Alligators, Coons, Possum

National Association of Always Complaining People

The NAACP should change their name to NAJGP:

They should change the second "A" to a "J" for "Justification" "C" to a "G" for "Ghetto"

"National Association for the Justification of Ghetto Principles".

NOW APES ARE CALLED PEOPLE

Anti-White Racism:

2009-08-19T21:06:00.000-07:00

by Michael Simoes

It seems all you see in the media is racism against people like Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics. Now come to think of it, I have never seen an article or watched a broadcast about Anti White material. So, I decided to make one.

Anti White Racism has been under the radar of people for years. It’s a global phenomena and hasn’t made headlines anywhere until now. Anti White Racism is accepted, while Anti Black Racism is thrown at you like a bat out of hell. Why? Because the left believes it is OK to be racist against whites. They think that whites are racist with any bad comments about other races but when blacks throw riots and stand up to “YT” they are called hero’s and are treated like royalty. Whites are the oppressors and other races are the victims.

It seems like the idea is the other way around today. This kind of screwed up logic is ignored by the media these days. Case in point, Hate Speech. In the media the racial slurs against blacks are like jumping off a ten story building. Although, Anti White racial slurs are widely accepted and used regularly by blacks. Jokes about Blacks and Hispanics are non-tolerated and can get you fired or expelled from school. “Redneck” jokes on the other hand are considered humor and a good gut buster once in a while.

Now the label “Racist” takes charge. This label being used to target Whites more than any other race. That being a big tool of the left wing media. This name is as deadly as a bite from a Cobra. It ruins lives, reputations, and can get you beat up on the street. Come to think of it, being called a “Racist” is the worst thing you can be known as…if your white.

Teachings in schools today go way farther than advanced Algebra and Science. A Harvard professor by the name of Noel Ignatiev, published an article in 2002 entitled, “Abolish The White Race”. A quote from his story is stated as, “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race” and “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed - not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed”. This professor was White. This was accepted by Harvard and the media remained silent. Of course if the article was known as “Abolish The Black Race”. The media would not shut up about it for a week.

Anti White Racism is excepted, encouraged in some ways. Untouched by the media, remains to be protested. When will this Anti White Racism end? Who knows. Maybe when this ends all Racism will too.

-The Onion: Obama has Bipolar Disorder.

2009-08-19T07:11:00.001-07:00

-The Onion: Obama has Bipolar Disorder.

Black racist pleads guilty to making racial threats

2009-08-16T20:42:00.000-07:00

Why Blacks say “Ax” instead of Ask

2009-08-16T20:37:00.000-07:00

Pedophiles the Hate Bill Protects part two

2009-08-13T08:50:00.000-07:00

By Harmony Grant & Aaron Daws

The federal hate crimes bill adds homosexuals (and homosexual pedophiles) to the list of groups given unconstitutional protection from so-called hate crimes. Headed to the Presidents desk, this bill is another giant step to legitimize homosexuality and suppress all moral criticism of this perversion.

At no time in American history has criticism of homosexuality been more desperately needed. The revolution that stripped marital sexuality of its sacredness has leached into the lives of our children. Pro-homosexual sex education, explicit media productions for kids, and even public advocacy for pedophilia are new realities against which it is becoming dangerous to speak. The fetish of male homosexuals for young boys and the vulnerabilities of children in an increasingly sexualized age are not spoken of enough.

In downtown Portland, our city, gay nightclub the Escape is open to all ages. Children even younger than 12 are allowed, as are middle-aged pederasts looking for prey. In the Escape you can see middle-aged, shirtless men dancing with teens and plenty of clientele dressed only in underwear; a pole and three stages are available for explicit performances by visitors of any age. One homosexual teen told The Oregonian she was 15 when she first started frequenting the Escape. The Oregonian reported this fact casually in a story about her life as a gay teen in Portland.

Even a brief glance at the culture of homosexual nightclubs gives any thinking person pause about welcoming such sexual deviancy into a legitimate, let alone a federally protected, status! An online guide lists over 200 nightclubs for homosexuals in the United States, more than in Canada, Australia and the UK combined. Such clubs in Portland include Club Portland, a bathhouse open since 1987. Club Portland claims to be the West Coasts largest; Willamette Week describes the bathhouse industry as booming in Portland.

In Club Portland,

you can climb winding stairs to three floors of labyrinthine, blacklit hallways lined with small rooms. Porn runs in a small viewing room with bleacher-style seating. The smoking lounge, on the other hand, features local TV and copies of Details. Individual showers, "gang showers," a blinding steam room and a sauna comprise the clean, well-lit "wet area" on the second floor--a comparatively small piece of the total space, but the bathhouse's epicenter.

Executive producer of the Cascade AIDS Project told WW, You can walk into a bar and watch hardcore gay porn while you drink your beer," Bruner says. "Across the street there's a business that charges people to come in and have anonymous sex. I'm not saying there aren't similar businesses that cater to straight people. But do they play the same role they play in gay culture? I would say no." To countless traditional Americans, same-gender sex itself is a deviant fetish that should not be allowed, let alone celebrated. The forced legitimization of homosexuality denies this sincerely held and highly justifiable belief, while exalting a sexual preference that is notorious for its seamy and degrading culture. One STD counselor in Portland said some men he interviews report sex with 15 to 20 anonymous partners in the same night. Reporting on the bathhouse in 2003, Willamette Week said that in Multnomah County, reported infections [of syphilis] among men doubled between 2000 and 2002Â… Oregon is thought to have the nation's sixth-fastest-growing syphilis rate.

This STD is passed from promiscuous men to the boys they rape. As if the psychological devastation to young boys were not enough, such infection of youth is a compelling reason the darkest side of homosexuality must be known.

Much of the WW article is spent trying to explain why aggressive safe-sex campaigns and AIDS/STD education (threatening death, blindness and lots of pain) dont slow the epidemic of reckless, anonymous sex in the homosexual culture. There is no real explanation. The AIDS worker concludes this is maybe a part of hedonism and recklessness that just doesn't make any sense."

Yes, and maybe the same mysterious perverse behavior and abandon, which characterizes this dark underbelly of homosexual life, should also be examinedsince its sordid compulsions drive so many homosexuals toward the most vulnerable of all: children..

Pedophilia in High Places

The Escape nightclub isnt the only way Portland opens its arms to homosexuals interested in kids. In 2005, current Portland Mayor Sam Adamsa public homosexualhad a romantic relationship with intern Beau Breedlove, who was then 17. Adams claims to have waited until after Breedloves 18th birthday to have sex with him; during elections Adams lied about his relationship with the teenager and denied any sexual contact. The truth came out in 2009 after Breedlove went to the press and was paid for his story.. Police now refuse to investigate Adams actions.

Rev. Louis Sheldon of Traditional Values Coalition summarizes cases of high-profile pederasty in recent US history:

In 1983Â…Democrat Congressman Gerry Studds [revealed he] had engaged in sodomy with a 17-year-old boy. Studds refused to apologize and was re-elected in 1984 by a 56% margin by his Massachusetts Democrat voters and retired in 1996. When he was being reprimanded in Congress, he turned his back on his colleagues to show his contempt for their reprimand. In 1980, Maryland Republican Bob Bauman was arrested for sodomizing a 16-year-old male prostituteÂ…

In 1989, Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Barney Frank was exposed for permitting homosexual partner Steve Gobie to operate a male prostitution ring out of Franks condo in Washington, DC. Frank was reprimanded by the House but won re-election in 1990 by 66% of the vote. He is re-elected every two years by his liberal voters.

Why are politicians allowed to get away with this behavior? Is some kind of pedophile lobby advocating behind the scenes? It certainly appears so! The American Psychiatric Association (APA)the most influential psychiatric organization, instructing psychiatrists and trainees worldwideshows the power of this unseen force.

In 1994, the APA drastically modified its criteria for diagnosing pedophilia as a mental illness in the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). The earlier version, DSM-III-R, stated that simply acting on sexual desire for children was adequate to diagnose pedophilia. In the current version, the APA changed its criteria so a child-molester is considered to have a psychiatric disorder only if his pedophilic actions caused clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning. Simply having sex with children no longer makes someone a pedophile, as long as it doesnt cause the adult significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of function.

In 1998, the APA review publication Psychological Bulletin published an article by three university academics agreeing that some children find sexual experiences with adults positive. The article also said boys respond more positively than girls to sexual encounters with adults. It concludes that man-boy consensual sexual relationships were often not harmful and sometimes even positive for victims. The authors cite Alfred Kinsey's 1948 work, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, as a guide for their child-abuse disguised as science study. (Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 22)

In the December 2002 issue of Archives of Sexual Behavior, psychiatrist Charles Moser of San Francisco's Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality and other experts argued to completely remove pedophilia from the DSM. Some writers in the issue said there is little or no proof that sex with adults harms children. Moser concludes, Any sexual interest can be healthy and life-enhancing. (Complete text and commentary - Pedophilia: Concepts and Controversy, Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 31, no. 6, December 2002, pp. 465-510.)

The December 2002 Archives of Sexual Behavior quotes an article from an earlier issue by Robert Bauserman (Psychology Dept University of Michigan).

The diversity of sexual behavior in a cross-cultural perspective is amazing to those who assume that their own societys moral standards are somehow the law of nature. Yet it is a fact that almost every sort of sexual activityÂ…has been considered normal in some society at some timeÂ…Man-boy relationships are no exception to this rule of diversityÂ…Although they are roundly condemned by many segments of Western society as inherently abusive and exploitive, there have been (and still are) many societies that do not share this viewpoint. (Bauserman, Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1997 issue)

Bauserman thus implies that, since this behavior is viewed as acceptable in other cultures, we should legitimize it in ours.

Sexualizing our Kids

Alfred Kinsey hugely affected the APAs stance on pedophilia as well as sex theory throughout the western world by saying children are innately sexual and have orgasms from birth and that homosexuality and sodomy are normal. Pedophilia advocates, piggy-backing on Kinsey, say kids should be allowed to express their nature with whomever they choose. Apparently, the Anti-Defamation League and other so-called civil rights groups agree about childrens innate sexuality, since they press for sex discussions and education (including pro-homosexual dogma, winningly packaged) for children as young as eight months! (See, Pedophiles the Hate Bill Protects, Part One) It is now illegal for parents to opt their children out of homosexual education lectures in grade school in California.

In the past, sex education in public schools centered on pubertal changes and gender differences. Today the focus has shifted to sexual behavior including homosexuality. Such teaching sexualizes children. What if we forced children to learn about sexual fetishes, such as bondage? Forced education about homosexuality is no different. It also confuses children at a vulnerable time, exposing them to the suggestion that they may be homosexual, leading them toward gay support groups where activist adults affirm their deviance.

Dr. Judith Reisman summarizes:

As a matter of fact, our children are told that theyre animals, sexual from birth. Theyre told that they can engage in sexual conduct with one another, gender undifferentiated, while some professors and teachers indicate sex with adults is legitimate. The product of such fraudulent, pedophile-biased sex education is seen in the American Psychiatric Association claim that pedophiles are not necessarily troubled unless they feel badly about their lust for children.

It is still officially unacceptable to advocate for pederasty or pedophilia. You may find it difficult to believe a pedophile lobby could ever gain clout in Washington.. But at one time, homosexuality was also illegal in the states. In Connecticut in 1650, adultery could be punished by the death penalty. Judges could order unmarried people who had sex to be whipped. Today, adultery and premarital sex are common themes of popular entertainment; homosexual contact is also now a regular image. This is how sexual mores can be manipulated. Would our great-great-great-grandparents have ever anticipated Ellen, RuPaul, Gossip Girl, or that film couples would be expected to jump into bed on their first date, in every movie?

In her article, Making Bi/Homosexual Youth, Reisman reports A recent "teen poll" conducted by the establishment girls magazine Seventeen claimed that seventeen percent of teens polled in 1991, versus fifty-four percent polled in 1999, accept homosexuality as appropriate.

Unless bold Americans speak the whole truth about homosexualityand the hate crime laws giving it judicial protection and absolute cultural legitimacythe next generations will be raised in the national equivalent of a gay bathhouse. Already, sexual depravities stream incessantly from TV and cinema screens, computer desktops, and every second song on the radio. The sacred, divinely given joys of sexuality have been stolen from youth taught to use each others bodies, male or female, for fleeting and corrupt self-gratification. Our children, from their youngest ages, are vulnerable to lies in the schools and predators on the streets (and in political office)!

Already our nation is very dark. If we do not speak up now, the next light we see may be the fire from heaven coming down on our Sodom.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Harmony Grant is a writer for National Prayer Network. To greater understand the illogic behind hate laws, read her article Top Eleven Reasons You Should Fight Hate Laws.

Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.

NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015
www.truthtellers.org

US Commission on Civil Rights finds race-bias in Health Care Bill

2009-08-12T15:17:00.000-07:00

Against Whites

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights says some little noticed provisions in the House health care bill are racially discriminatory, and it intends to ask President Obama and Congress to rewrite sections that factor in race when awarding billions in contracts, scholarships and grants.

In a draft of a letter the commission approved Friday, the group raises constitutional questions about giving preferential treatment to minority students for scholarships, and about favoring medical schools and organizations that have a record of sending graduates to areas with inadequate health care services.

Grants and scholarships would be available from the Department of Health and Human Services to educate minorities and underserved populations in public health, dentistry and health specialties, as well as to students who agree to serve in those areas of the country after graduation.

Versions of the House health care bill have passed in three committees and will be combined before the full House votes on the legislation in September. But it’s already running into resistance over the August recess in Town Hall discussions with members of Congress throughout the country.

http://www.newsnet14.com/2009/08/us-commission-on-civil-rights-finds-race-bias-in-health-care-bill/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/11/panel-sees-race-bias-in-health-care-bill/?source=newsletter_most-read-stories-today_photo_feature

Health Care Bill-Democrats version

2009-08-12T15:14:00.000-07:00

All 1, 018 pages of the Democrats health care bill (Pdf is at link below):

http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-Billtext-071409.pdf

BIBLE IS HATE, SAYS U.S. GOVERNMENT

2009-08-12T10:02:00.000-07:00

In its recent report to Congress, the U.S. State Department "Office of Global Anti-Semitism" makes a startling policy statement. It says the New Testament record that the Jews had Christ crucified is "classic anti-Semitism" -- a historic form of hate. 1

In its 2005 report to Congress, the State Department included as an "anti-Semitic incident" the case of a Polish priest who said Jews killed Christ. Today, three years later, the State Department could not be clearer.

Are you one of tens of millions of Christians who agree with Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ that evil Jewish leaders incited a Jewish mob and persuaded Pilate to have Christ crucified? The U.S. government now considers you "anti-Semitic." You are part of a worldwide scourge the U.S. government, Canada , Australia , and 55 European nations are uniting to suppress. 2

In the many countries now ruled by hate laws, it is already a federal offense to repeat the claim of New Testament "hate literature" that the Jews had Christ crucified. 3 The State Department's equation of Biblical Christianity with "hate" is an ominous indication. The Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith – architect of hate laws worldwide (and primary ideological and statistics-gathering force behind the Office of Global Anti-Semitism) -- is moving rapidly to create bias against Christians as haters, particularly of Jews and homosexuals.

Despite passionate support of Israel by evangelicals, ADL claims Christianity is inherently anti-Semitic. ADL says the New Testament is the seedbed of suspicion and blame against Jews leading to the Holocaust of WW II. 3 Televangelist John Hagee, recipient of numerous ADL/B'nai B'rith awards, upholds ADL propaganda. He preaches that Jews did not reject or kill Christ, do not have to accept Him, and that New Testament Christianity is a primary source of anti-Semitism throughout the ages. 4

As Jewish-dominated media increasingly persuades the public and government to agree with this stereotype, it will become easier to pass Christian-restricting hate crimes laws. 5 All who adhere to the Bible on homosexuality or Jewish complicity in Christ’s death could be subject to state-sponsored prosecution.

Bible believers aren’t the only ones at risk. The State Department report also says it is anti-Semitic to:

Allege "intentionally or unintentionally" that the state of Israel persecutes Palestinians.
Criticize "intentionally or unintentionally" Zionism or Israel if such criticism leads to lowering of the public opinion of Jews or the government, military, or people of Israel (p. 33).
Compare the behavior of Israel 's leaders and military (in suppression of Palestinians) to Nazis (p. 22).
Publish cartoons depicting the Israeli government and military as similar to Nazis.
Diminish the 6-million figure of Holocaust dead in any amount.
Question that gas chambers were the primary means of killing 6 million Jews (p.22).
Allege that Jews exert undue influence in Congress and the White House.
Allege that Jews exert undue influence in the media.
Claim there exists a "Jewish conspiracy" to dominate society (p.19).
Allege that American Jews are equally loyal to Israel (p.19).
Deny the people of Israel their “right of self-determination.” This means upholding Biblical law that the Jewish people cannot reoccupy Palestine in unrighteousness. This also means denying them occupation through illegal settlements of all the territory promised to Abraham.
Reveal hostility (as Christ did) toward Talmudic (pharisaic) Judaism.
The State Department warns against "unintentional" anti-Semitism (i.e. criticism of Israel , or making known unpleasant facts about Judaism). These acts might not be meant to stimulate anti-Semitism, but do. The moral? Be safe; don't criticize Israel or matters Jewish at all. Evil people might twist legitimate facts to hateful ends.

Clearly, an office of the U.S. State Department has been created by the Anti-Defamation League, at taxpayer expense, as a propaganda oracle of its own anti-Christian "hate crimes agenda." Congress unanimously created this office of thought crimes disinformation in 2004. Cast your vote to end its influence: call your Senators and Representative. Call toll-free at 1-877-851-6437. Tell them: "Please revoke funding for the State Department's Office of Global Anti-Semitism. It does not represent scholarly research but the anti-Christian biases of the Anti-Defamation League."

Your members of Congress voted in this Orwellian “ministry of propaganda.” They can vote it out. Call now!

Lust for Power

It is obvious that ADL/ B’nai B’rith, Israel , and international Zionism are demanding a place of freedom from constructive criticism. Americans do not give such to our government, politicians, or military. Yet the Jewish-dominated Department of Global Anti-Semitism expects us to give it to a foreign government, Israel .

What does freedom from criticism for Jews and Israel really mean? It is not compassion, or compensation for centuries of Jewish suffering. It is not real security for Israel .

Freedom from criticism is what the Neros, Napoleons, Hitlers and Stalins of history were similarly obsessed to obtain – at the price of others' freedom.

It’s called dictatorship.

-----

ADL'S FOXMAN: NEW TESTAMENT IS ANTI-SEMITIC

Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, believes anti-Semitism will last as long as Christians accept the New Testament's "lie" that the ancient Pharisees were responsible for the death of Christ. 1

In his recent book, Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism, 2 Foxman claims this "deadly" 3 deception has caused untold Jewish suffering through the millennia. Such New Testament-generated hate culminated in the Holocaust, he claims - but it breaks out afresh as the "Christ-killers" charge is inferred in Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ and readings from the "anti-Semitic" Christian story at Easter.

Foxman says another wave of global anti-Semitism and persecution of Jews could be on the way unless Christians agree to ignore large sections of the New Testament.

What sections will probably be on his "must censor" list? Certainly, it would include Christ's incendiary attacks on the Pharisees, whom He called "whitewashed tombs, full of dead men's bones." 4 Foxman would also censor the Apostle John: "He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son does not have the life... Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son." 5 In the book of Revelation, recorded by John, Jesus says those Jews who reject Him are "the synagogue of Satan," 6 another passage Foxman would certainly cut out.

But most importantly, Foxman would censor the multitude of passages in all the Gospels that reveal a pharisaic conspiracy to entrap and finally murder Christ. 7 The book of Acts squarely lays blame for the crucifixion upon the Pharisees and the nation of the Jews. 8 To please Foxman, St. Paul's clear indictment must also be omitted: "The Jews...killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God but hostile to all men." 9

Foxman claims Jews were not responsible for the crucifixion and that Roman officials masterminded Jesus' death. But only one "Roman official" is mentioned in the New Testament as authorizing the crucifixion; Pontius Pilate was a weak-willed political opportunist, reluctant to condemn Christ. He was coerced by an entire Jewish Sanhedrin and a mob of Jewish citizens who screamed, "Crucify him! His blood be upon us and on our children." 10

Foxman's Case Against the New Testament

Foxman summarizes his case against the New Testament:

"Over the last century a growing preponderance of evidence and scholarly study has demonstrated that the execution of Jesus was instigated primarily by the Roman authorities who ruled Palestine in the first century C.E., not by the Jewish people. And the anti-Jewish rhetoric that mars several books of the Christian New Testament has been shown to reflect not historical fact but the rivalry at the time the books were written between Jews who followed Jesus and those who did not.

"Nonetheless, versions of the Gospel narratives that emphasize Jewish guilt (rather than the responsibility of the Roman imperial authorities who actually imposed and carried out the death sentence) were included in the Christian canon. As a result, with every annual reading or reenactment of the story of the death of Jesus in Christian churches, millions of Christians imbibed the notion that the Jews had been guilty of the worst crime in history. Into our own time, the deicide libel has been used to justify hatred of Jews and violence against them, including from Christian pulpits. Through the centuries these denunciations have led to countless outbreaks of violence against Jews, including murderous pogroms, a bitterly ironic betrayal of the legacy of the man Christians revere as the Prince of Peace.

"For almost two thousand years Christian teachings drove the spread of anti-Semitism throughout Europe and beyond. (As we'll see, the current explosion of anti-Semitism in the Moslem Middle East is fueled largely by myths and doctrines that originated in Europe.) The story of Christian anti-Semitism is a long, complicated and tragic one. Scholars such as the late Dr. James Parks have traced a direct line from ancient Christian teachings on Jews and Judaism to the death camps of Hitler." 11

Christians Still Guilty

According to Foxman, Christians in modern times are also very largely responsible for the Holocaust.

"...many Germans and Austrians who spent the week murdering Jews then went to church on Sunday, apparently seeing no inconsistency in their actions and it's also true that the political and social atmosphere in which the persecution and killing of millions of Jews could be seen as broadly acceptable could not have existed without the tacit acceptance of the Christian churches - as well as the ingrained anti-Semitism of twenty centuries of dogma, doctrine and preaching that demonized Jews...because Christians and the Christian churches had spread hatred of Jews for so long, it's impossible for Christians - and in particular the Catholic Church - to regard themselves as passive or innocent bystanders during the Holocaust. The killings could not have happened without the sins of millions Christians - sins of commission as well as sins of omission." 12

Modern Christianity, Foxman asserts, is thus based on hateful, vengeful lies spread by the New Testament. He says the evangelism practiced by devout Christians is also anti-Semitic. "Although it is supposedly motivated by love for the Jews, this idea [that Jews should be converted] is inherently anti-Semitic in that it implicitly denigrates the value of Jewish belief." 13

Threat of Religious Right

But Foxman's allegations go farther still. He says we should fear Christians because they want to take over America! They are "part of a broader strategy to transform American government into a wholly owned subsidiary of the evangelical movement... They seek the power to impose that faith on everyone in America, replacing pluralism and tolerance with theocracy." 14 Ironically, Foxman thus becomes one of the "conspiracy theorists" he usually rails against.

Foxman's ADL exerts enormous influence over at least half million Jewish members of B'nai B'rith worldwide. His dark warnings about the Christian threat helps explain the eagerness of many Jews to oppose Christian symbols, ceremonies, holidays, and values.

Foxman is trying to instill a guilt complex in Christians and a desire in the Jewish people to resist, restrict, and ultimately persecute Christians; 15 ADL/B'nai B'rith hate laws were created for this purpose.

To stimulate Jewish anger at Christians, evil Jewish leaders are creating a truly Big Lie: that the New Testament is inherently evil, anti-Semitic and violence-generating - a book which, like Mein Kampf, should not be read.

How Should Christians Respond to Foxman?

Bible-believing Christians remain extremely reluctant to identify evil Jewish leaders for what they are (Jewish). Such truthtelling, however, would be very constructive. It would embarrass the Jewish community into restraining their brethren in Jewish "civil liberties" groups and the media. Tragically, lack of specificity from evangelicals only gives a green light to evil Jewish leadership, hidden behind a media they control. Eventually, they will convince not only the Jewish people but the world that Christianity is the most hateful and hurtful of the world's religions. A generation from now, our media-reared children may regard Christianity as deserving outright persecution.

The power of Foxman's blame-throwing against Christians inheres in his presumption that all who have ever called themselves Christians are indeed Christians. This allows him to lump together in "collective guilt" those who, throughout history, were Christian in name only with those who do in fact epitomize the words of the gentle Jesus. Christ commanded us to love our neighbors and bless our enemies.

Anyone who behaves in a malicious persecutive manner toward Jews, especially to the extent of the medieval barbarities and pogroms, is not a Christian. A true Christian is simply not responsible for the misdeeds of counterfeit Christians, nor is the New Testament.

Nowhere does the New Testament remotely hint that Christians should persecute Jews, nor does it provide even one example of such persecution. On the contrary, the book of Acts contains at least 20 instances of Christians being persecuted at the urging of Jewish leaders. 16 This is the kind of persecution that ADL's national executive board member, Philadelphia district attorney Lynne Abraham, brought down upon 11 Christians in Philadelphia in 2004. They were jailed and threatened with 47 years in prison and $80,000 fines each, for the "hate crime" of witnessing to homosexuals on a public sidewalk.

Should Christians Change the New Testament?

Can Christians accommodate Foxman and disregard the New Testament? Not without destroying Christianity - the New Testament defines Christianity.

No Christian can omit or de-emphasize any part of the New Testament. To do so is to be ashamed of the Gospel of Christ, an act for which Christ will be ashamed of that person on the Day of Judgment. 17

After 300 years of blessing 18 from Christian America, a nation established on New Testament values, it is time for Foxman to face reality. Jews, far from being harried victims, have been the coddled darlings of evangelical New Testament-believing Christians since at least the 17th century.

Foxman and Jewish leaders should stop raking up the past and count their present blessings - blessings which would never have come upon them except within a civilization upholding Christ's New Testament message of love and forbearance.

The church must stand resolute against Foxman's demands that it deny the New Testament.

It is Foxman's persecution complex which must end.

End Notes:

1 Most Christians already accommodate Foxman by saying we "all" have crucified Christ by sinning. This doctrine was virtually unheard of before the 1970s when Billy Graham first promoted it; it is neither Biblical nor logical. The Bible does teach that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23). It also states those who have once believed and yet apostasized "again crucify…the Son of God" (Heb. 6:6). Yet Scripture does not teach that through some metaphysical alchemy we all participated in the crucifixion. The crucifixion was a unique historical event nearly 2000 years ago when Christ was rejected by His own, the Jewish people. Though Pilate was badgered into authorizing it and a handful of Roman soldiers drove the nails, the force behind the crucifixion was entirely Jewish. The New Testament assertion of the Jewishness of the crucifixion is central to the historic prophecies and claims which ground the Scripture. Without such a reference point there is little significance in Christ's return someday to rescue and absolve a repentant Jewish remnant from the stigma of so heinous a national sin. This may explain why the New Testament repeats its charge of Jewish guilt in about forty different passages.

2 Harper, San Francisco, 2004.

3 "...Christianity developed a set of doctrines that proved to be deadly," p.97.

4 Matt. 23:27.

5 I John 5:12; 2:22.

6 Rev. 3:9.

7 Christ's revelation that He would suffer under the Jews and be killed. Mt. 16:21, Mk. 8:31, Lk. 9:22; "One man should die for the people." "...planned together to kill Him." Jn. 11: 47-53, Jn. 18:14; "Delivered to the chief priests and condemned to death." Mt. 20: 18-19, Mk. 10:33, Lk. 18: 31-33; "...and they plotted together to seize Jesus by stealth and to kill Him." Mt. 26:4, Lk. 22:2, Jn. 7:1; "...to obtain false testimony against Jesus, in order that they might put Him to death." Mt. 26:59; "Why do you seek to kill me?" Jn. 7:19, Jn. 8:37,40; "Is not this the man they are seeking to kill?" Jn 7:25; "Chief priests and elders took counsel against Jesus to put Him to death." "...delivered Him to Pilate." Mt. 27:1-2, Mk. 15:1, Lk. 23:1; "Pilate knew that because of envy they had, delivered Him up." Mt. 27:18, Mk. 15:10; "What are you willing to give to me to deliver Him up to you?" "Chief priests and scribes seeking how they might put Him to death." Mt. 26:15, Mk. 14:10-11, Lk. 22:2-
6; "...seeking how to destroy Him." Mk. 11:18, Lk. 19:47; "chief priests and elders persuaded the multitudes to ask for Barabas, and to put Jesus to death." Mt. 27:20, Mk. 15:11, Lk. 23:18, Jn. 18:40; "...and they shouted ‘crucify Him!" "He ought to die!" Mt. 27:22-23, Mk. 15:13-14, Lk. 23:21-23, Jn. 19:6-7,15; "Pilate delivered Jesus to their will." Mt. 27:26, Mk. 15:15, Lk. 23:24-25, Jn. 19:16; "His blood be upon us and our children!" Mt. 27:25; "...for this reason he who delivered Me up to you has the greater sin." Jn 19:11; "...and how the chief priests and rulers delivered Him up to the sentence of death and crucified Him.Lk. 24:20; "...Jesus, whom ye have crucified..." Acts 2:36, Acts 3:14-15, Acts 4:10, Acts 5:30, Acts 13:28, Acts 21:11; "[Jews] who have both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets..." I Thess. 2: 14-16.

8 “...this man...you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death.” Acts 2:23; “God has made Him both Lord and Christ - this Jesus whom you crucified.” Acts 2:36; “But you disowned the Holy and Righteous One...and put to death the Prince of Life...” Acts 3:13-15; “Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified...” Acts 4:10; “Jesus, whom you had put to death by hanging Him on a cross,” Acts 5:30; “...the Righteous One, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become,” Acts 7:52; “...they asked Pilate that He be executed,” Acts 13:28.

9 I Thess 2:19, 15.

10 Matt. 27:22, 25.

11 P. 47 and 48.

12 P. 93 and 94.

13 P. 138.

14 P. 140 and 141.

15 To combat "a looming international emergency" of global anti-Semitism, Foxman urges his readers to "work for passage of hate crimes legislation on the national level and in states and localities where no such laws currently exist" (p. 178). ADL has been deeply frustrated over the five failures to pass its Orwellian federal hate bill, "The Local Law Enforcement and Enhancement Act."

16 Acts. 4:1-21; 5:17-18; 5:26-40; 6:9; 7:1-60; 8:1-4; 9:1-2; 11:19; 12:3; 13:50; 14:2-6, 19; 17:5-9; 18:12; 21:27; 22:22; 23:12; 24:1, 27; 25:7.

17 Mark 8:38.

18"Three and one-half million Jewish immigrants arrived on our shores around the turn of the century with an average of $9 per person in their pockets, less than almost any other immigrant group. Six decades later the mean family income of Jews was almost double the national average." (George Gilder, p. 11, Wealth and Poverty)

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/bibleishatesaysusgov.htm

Illegal Aliens Will Be Covered Under Obama’s Healthcare Bill

2009-08-12T09:52:00.000-07:00

About a week ago, the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee defeated an amendment which would have excluded illegal aliens from Obama’s massive healthcare bill. In addition to replacing our private healthcare system with a government-run program, many have argued that this bill is in fact, a ‘backdoor’ amnesty.

The Democratically-controlled committee voted 23-18 to defeat the measure introduced by Rep. Dean Heller (R-NV), which would have required the use of the existing Income and Eligibility Verification System and the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements System, before any care is given. This move would have ensured that only U.S. citizens would receive the taxpayer funded care.

While Obama has made claims that illegal aliens will not be covered by his plan, the following line can be found among the 1018 page bill: Sec. 59B, Pg. 170, Line 1—“Any NONRESIDENT alien is exempt from individual taxes.”

Judicial Watch’s president Tom Fitton recently reported that Mexico directs their citizens who live in the U.S. illegally, to use taxpayer funded clinics in a dozen cities. The program is called Ventanillas de Salud (Health Windows), and is implemented in American cities which have Mexican consulates.

The government of Mexico has operated the program for some time. In 2007, Fitton wrote the following:

“Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Diego and Indiana are among the cities where Mexican consulates operate the health referral system which annually costs U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars. In Los Angeles County alone, illegal immigrants cost taxpayers nearly $440 million in health services annually and a whopping $1.1 billion statewide.

The Mexican consul in Los Angeles proudly announced that nearly 300,000 Mexicans in the area have benefited from his government’s health referral program, which he says actually saves the county money by encouraging immigrants to seek preventive care rather than waiting for more expensive emergency treatment.

The Southern California operation promises to assess “consulate clients” for eligibility to government-funded health insurance and other primary care services and offers free legal assistance to those who are denied coverage. Its goal is to improve access to health services for immigrants of Mexican origin by formalizing a health education, medical home referral and insurance enrollment program.”

Last summer, candidate Obama addressed the 2008 National La Raza Conference and promised that he would pass so-called “Comprehensive Immigration Reform.” However, the American people have repeatedly and overwhelmingly rejected any plan for amnesty for illegal aliens, and given Obama’s plummeting poll numbers, he would not make another attempt at such a bill. So, Obama has decided to sneak measures into his healthcare bill which will further entrench illegal aliens across this nation.
If this bill passes, the American people will become financially responsible for the cradle to grave medical bills of all illegal aliens in this country. While the federal government has claimed for the last 10 years that there are only 12 million illegal aliens in the U.S., that number is much higher (closer to 60 million than to 12).
Along with our possessions, city services, and even many children’s innocence, illegal aliens will now steal full medical coverage from Americans, with the help of our own president!

http://www.examiner.com/x-5919-Norfolk-Crime-Examiner~y2009m8d3-Illegal-aliens-will-be-covered-under-Obamas-healthcare-bill?cid=examiner-email

Mission Creep and the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Misguided Focus

2009-08-12T09:29:00.000-07:00

In case you missed the story, last November 4th a polling precinct in Philadelphia, PA was patrolled by an organization called the New Black Panther Party, a Marxist group that in 2000, was listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a racial hate group. Video footage shot in 2008, show Black Panther precinct workers intimidating white voters. This was covered by the news organizations, and resulted in charges being filed by the Bush Department of Justice, whose job it is to defend and protect the voting rights of all Americans.

What should have been an open and shut case has become something more troubling, after the Eric Holder-led Justice Department dropped charges against the Black Panthers, who supported President Obama. Currently, this decision to drop the charges, is being challenged by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, (an organization with which I am affiliated).

Now this is the part where things really get interesting.

The SPLC has been mum on the issue, despite the fact that in 2000, it included the New Black Panther Party among its annual list of hate groups. In fact, what is most shocking is that the SPLC has spent far more resources hounding conservative organizations, such as the Center for Immigration Studies, and prominent citizens like CNN's award-winning anchor Lou Dobbs, than it has protecting the civil rights of American voters, which includes white people as well as black. The unrelenting attacks on Mr. Dobbs and others are shameless. The once venerable organization wages war against conservative individuals, principles, and organizations. How unfortunate for America. How unfortunate for the organization's founders.

There is a name for what has happened. It is called "mission creep." Mission creep occurs when an organization strays beyond its original purpose and engages in actions antithetical to its goals. Rather than monitoring hate groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center has become one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carol-m-swain/mission-creep-and-the-sou_b_255029.html

-------

Southern Poverty Law Center Has Become a Danger to America!

A once revered civil rights group named the Southern Poverty Law Center has now become a threat to the freedoms and security of American citizens due to their repeated attacks on all First Amendment rights and their utter debasement of the political process.

While in the past the SPLC has targeted “hate groups” or groups deemed racist and potentially violent, such as the KKK and Neo Nazi groups, the SPLC has recently used their reputation for fighting these groups to go after moderate and mainstream Americans, journalists, and show hosts and anchors in an attempt to suppress free speech.

The most recent attack from the SPLC on American freedoms has come in the public call for the firing of Lou Dobbs by SPLC President Richard Cohen.

Lou Dobbs did not take a position on President Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to serve as President as a natural born citizens. Lou Dobbs simply said “President Obama needs to “produce a birth certificate”.

American citizens of all walks of life are regularly made to provide a copy of their original birth certificate for jobs, licenses, passports, and other documents. Therefore, it is completely reasonable that President Barrack Hussein Obama should do the same to quell the large cohort of citizens that have serious questions about his eligibility to serve in an arena where there should be no doubts!

God forbid that the Southern Poverty Law Center’s call for free speech and freedom of the press to be destroyed in one fell swoop succeed, but is not even their call for the destruction of these rights offense enough?

Surely there will be some far left open borders and amnesty enthusiasts, that represent less than twenty percent of the US Population on the political issues of illegal immigration, that will support the SPLC call for the firing of Dobbs because they feel they will benefit from this abridgment of Constitutional rights in America.

However, Lou Dobbs’s political views are more closely aligned with the vast majority of Americans who want America’s borders secured and our existing immigration laws enforced. An even larger majority of people will support Dobbs’s right to say what he likes and report what he likes as an American citizen and member of the media. Thankfully, many Americans still realize that free speech is a sacrosanct pillar of our nation’s political processes and once esteemed place in history.

Today, SPLC President Richard Cohen sent out another release claiming that Lou Dobbs has some association with James von Brunn, the neo-Nazi accused of killing the Holocaust Memorial Museum guard.

Now things have taken a new turn with the SPLC asking even their left leaning supporters to come along with them on a direct attack on free speech and the freedom of the press in America in a move that is designed to try and limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Most of us could understand and tolerate these groups and their spokespersons having different political views than us. I even fully support their free speech and right to engage in unpopular free speech supporting their positions in support for open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens.

But by targeting moderate groups and commentators, smearing their names with false associations with murderous racists, and attempting to simultaneously interfere with Constitutionally protected freedoms of Americans, the SPLC has gone too far and has become a threat to the American rules, principles, ideals and freedoms necessary to allow peaceful political change and diffuse calls for violence from the extremes.

I personally feel that the actions of the SPLC are increasing the chances of political violence in America as this group is trying to silence free expression of concerns and redress of grievances of tens of millions of Americans. The Americans the SPLC is targeting are not some violent fringe group, they are heartland Americans of every race and political party that believe in the founding principles of the United States!

Let us speak out with one voice against the SPLC and challenge the presence and messages of their spokespeople such as Richard Cohen, Morris Dees, Mark Potok, Heidi Beirich, and others when they are masquerading as a civil rights group before the media and lawmakers.

http://www.alipac.us/article4412.html

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2009/08/southern_povert.php

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/24/major-civil-rights-group_n_244532.html

DEADLY DOCTORS

2009-08-12T09:02:00.000-07:00

THE health bills coming out of Congress would put the decisions about your care in the hands of presidential appointees. They’d decide what plans cover, how much leeway your doctor will have and what seniors get under Medicare.

Yet at least two of President Obama’s top health advisers should never be trusted with that power.

Start with Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. He has already been appointed to two key positions: health-policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget and a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Emanuel bluntly admits that the cuts will not be pain-free. “Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely ‘lipstick’ cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change,” he wrote last year (Health Affairs Feb. 27, 2008).

Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, “as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others” (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).

Yes, that’s what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.

Many doctors are horrified by this notion; they’ll tell you that a doctor’s job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time.

Emanuel, however, believes that “communitarianism” should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia” (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. ‘96).

Translation: Don’t give much care to a grandmother with Parkinson’s or a child with cerebral palsy.

He explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years” (Lancet, Jan. 31).

The bills being rushed through Congress will be paid for largely by a $500 billion-plus cut in Medicare over 10 years. Knowing how unpopular the cuts will be, the president’s budget director, Peter Orszag, urged Congress this week to delegate its own authority over Medicare to a new, presidentially-appointed bureaucracy that wouldn’t be accountable to the public.

Since Medicare was founded in 1965, seniors’ lives have been transformed by new medical treatments such as angioplasty, bypass surgery and hip and knee replacements. These innovations allow the elderly to lead active lives. But Emanuel criticizes Americans for being too “enamored with technology” and is determined to reduce access to it.

Dr. David Blumenthal, another key Obama adviser, agrees. He recommends slowing medical innovation to control health spending.

Blumenthal has long advocated government health-spending controls, though he concedes they’re “associated with longer waits” and “reduced availability of new and expensive treatments and devices” (New England Journal of Medicine, March 8, 2001). But he calls it “debatable” whether the timely care Americans get is worth the cost. (Ask a cancer patient, and you’ll get a different answer. Delay lowers your chances of survival.)

Obama appointed Blumenthal as national coordinator of health-information technology, a job that involves making sure doctors obey electronically deivered guidelines about what care the government deems appropriate and cost effective.

In the April 9 New England Journal of Medicine, Blumenthal predicted that many doctors would resist “embedded clinical decision support” — a euphemism for computers telling doctors what to do.

Americans need to know what the president’s health advisers have in mind for them. Emanuel sees even basic amenities as luxuries and says Americans expect too much: “Hospital rooms in the United States offer more privacy . . . physicians’ offices are typically more conveniently located and have parking nearby and more attractive waiting rooms” (JAMA, June 18, 2008).

No one has leveled with the public about these dangerous views. Nor have most people heard about the arm-twisting, Chicago-style tactics being used to force support. In a Nov. 16, 2008, Health Care Watch column, Emanuel explained how business should be done: “Every favor to a constituency should be linked to support for the health-care reform agenda. If the automakers want a bailout, then they and their suppliers have to agree to support and lobby for the administration’s health-reform effort.”

Do we want a “reform” that empowers people like this to decide for us?

http://www.nypost.com/seven/07242009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/deadly_doctors_180941.htm?&page=0

Serial killer wants confession thrown out

2009-08-11T14:47:00.000-07:00

"Life doesn't always mean life in Ohio"

That's how Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters sums up convicted killer Anthony Kirkland.

A 19 year old Kirkland was first convicted in the 1987 beating death of his then girlfriend that he also set on fire. Kirkland served 16 years of a 25 year sentence. He was paroled in 2003, and left unsupervised after 13 months of probation.
Kirland was sent back to prison in 2007 for trying to have sex with a 13 year old, he was out and living at the now notorious Pogue Center in a years time, this time he was also a convicted sex offender.

From the time he was first paroled in 2003 to the arrest in the rape and murder of Esme Kenney; Kirkland is accused of rape, assault, and multiple counts of murder. He is also accused of soliciting sex from numerous under aged girls, attacking an ex-girlfriend new boyfriend with scissors, causing a SWAT stand-off and burglary.

Defense attorneys are now filing motions to separated all charges in Kirkland's case, which means multiple trials for each murder he is accused of committing. His attorneys are also trying to get his confession thrown out, citing his Constitutional rights were violated.

Kirkland murder victims are as follows -

28 year old Leola Douglas in 1987
14 year old Casonya "Sharee" Crawford in 2006
45 year old Mary Jo Newton in 2006
25 year old Kimya Rolison in 2009
13 year old Esme Kenney in 2009

http://www.newnation.org/NNN-Black-on-White.html

Black crimes are foundation of whites’ fears

2009-08-11T14:38:00.000-07:00

By Paul Marx

BLACK intellectuals just don’t get it. They refuse to understand why there is widespread racial profiling and why they and people they know often are its victims. Black intellectuals simply refuse to acknowledge that there is a very obvious connection between themselves and the lawless black underclass.

In a recent essay in The New York Times, Brent Staples, a member of the newspaper’s editorial board, wrote, “The experience of being mistaken for a criminal is almost a rite of passage for African-American men. Security guards shadow us in stores. Troopers pull us over for the crime of ‘driving while black.’ Nighttime pedestrians cower by us on the streets.”

In expressing his disgust that the Harvard professor-Cambridge cop confrontation has not been seen generally as a flagrant instance of racial profiling, Times columnist Bob Herbert urges black people “to rant and to rave, to demonstrate and to lobby, to march and confront and to sue and generally do whatever is necessary to stop a continuing and deeply racist criminal justice outrage.”

The Harvard professor — Henry Louis Gates Jr. — and Staples and Herbert think the unfair treatment of blacks by the police is 100 percent the fault of white people. In the view of Staples, white people need to exorcise their “poisonous misconceptions.”

But, for racial profiling to go away, blacks, especially black intellectuals, need to remove their blinders. They need to see what whites see. They need to see and acknowledge the criminal lifestyle that is pervasive in the black underclass.

Young black men of the ghettoes take pride in carrying guns and have little respect for law. When they go outside their communities, the guns and attitudes are not left behind. In much of their music, they are out front, bragging about their lawlessness.

White people’s awareness of that criminal lifestyle creates fear, and that fear, unfortunately, becomes wariness of even law-abiding blacks.

Black crime is the most potent determiner today of white attitudes toward blacks. While the great majority of American blacks are not involved in criminal activity, the criminal lifestyle of young black men makes most whites fearful and suspicious. That is a great injustice, because among middle-class blacks, there is relatively little crime.

In many cities — New Haven, Hartford, Brooklyn, Baltimore, for instance — major hospitals are located on the edge of neighborhoods populated by the black underclass. When whites who work at the hospitals drive through those neighborhoods, they make sure their windows are up and doors are locked. Walking from the parking lot to the workplace is risky. In e-mails, medical students and hospital staff are informed of robberies and beatings by young black men. They are warned against walking alone.

If it is dangerous to “drive while black,” it is even more dangerous to walk while white in some neighborhoods. Driving while black may result in the indignity of a speeding ticket; walking while white could result in a fractured skull.

Staples has written about his walks near the University of Chicago. It upset him that when white women walking alone noticed him, they would try to avoid him, speeding up or crossing the street. He was befuddled about why a completely innocent black man should be avoided. Why couldn’t the women understand that he was Brent Staples, not some thug?

The other day, I was walking down a street and suddenly I saw three young black men coming toward me. My first reaction was “uh-oh.” I thought I might be attacked. When I wasn’t, I thought how unfair it was to think that.

But it is a typical reaction when a white person walks alone in a fringy neighborhood. Lawless young black men cause fear among whites, and it is not unnatural for whites to be suspicious of all blacks who fit the profile of the attackers. Would it be unnatural for the citizens of African cities — like Lagos, Nairobi or Harare — to be suspicious of white men if there were an epidemic among whites of robbings and beatings?

The American media have bent over backward to avoid identifying criminal perpetrators and suspects by race. But by names, addresses, education and criminal records, people easily jump to conclusions, and they usually are correct. They then generalize.

It may not be logical to do this, but for most people, generalizing comes as easily as eating. This is not fair to law-abiding blacks, but most white people would rather have an unfair thought than risk being hurt.

http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2009/08/06/opinion/doc4a7a5350b0103427090509.txt

Black Invention Myths

2009-08-11T11:27:00.000-07:00

Hate Laws Exposed

2009-08-11T10:49:00.000-07:00

WHO'S BEHIND THE 'PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT?'

2009-08-11T10:45:00.000-07:00

Hawaii Confirms Obama Birth Certificate Not Released

2009-08-09T22:59:00.000-07:00

Contrary to widespread media reports, Hawaiian health officials have not publicly released President Obama's original, "long-form" birth certificate, state officials confirm to Newsmax.

Many media reports have insisted the president's actual birth certificate is available on the Internet for anyone to download. It is not.

Barack Obama’s "certification of live birth," was issued by the state of Hawaii and was posted first on the Obama presidential campaign Web site.

Such a certification sometimes is called the “short form" — some agencies accept it as an equivalent of a birth certificate, some do not.

The document is essentially a summary of the actual long form birth certificate. The certification does not list the attending physician, the address or hospital where the delivery took place, or the parents' occupation. Typically, this information is included on the birth certificate.

Newsmax asked Janice S. Okubo, communications director for Hawaii's State Health Department, whether the department had released any of the president's vital records to anyone other than the president or a direct relative. Doing so would constitute a violation of HRS 338, Section 18, the Hawaii law intended to protect personal information and prevent identity theft.

Okubo's response: "The Hawaii State Department of Health complies with state laws" — meaning no public release of the document has occurred.

Throughout the so-called "birther" controversy — birthers suspect Obama was not born in the United States and therefore is not constitutionally eligible to serve as president — anchors and reporters have assumed wrongly that Obama's "certification of live birth" contains the same information as an original, long-form birth certificate:

MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews interviewed Rep. John Campbell, R-Calif., on July 21, lambasting him for co-sponsoring a House bill that would require presidential candidates to submit documents to establish their constitutional eligibility to serve as president.

"What you're doing is appeasing the nut cases," Matthews said. "As you just pointed out, this [bill] won't prove or disprove whether Barack Obama is a citizen. By the way, let me show you his birth certificate" — Matthews held up a document — "That's the way to deal with this: Mail a copy of this certificate to the wacko wing of your party, so they see it and say, 'I agree with this. It's over.'"

Matthews held up Obama’s certification of live birth — not his birth certificate.

Talk host Rachel Maddow stated on June 11: "This baseless, mouth-breathing, whack-job theory became such an issue during the presidential campaign that Mister Obama did actually release a certificate of his birth from Hawaii, showing that he was born in Honolulu in 1961. And yet, the 'birther' movement persists."

What the Obama campaign released was the certification-of-live-birth summary.

In response to a question from correspondent Les Kinsolving on why the president doesn't simply release his long-form birth certificate, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs replied incredulously: "You're looking for the president's birth certificate? It's on the Internet."

CNN anchor Rick Sanchez recently held up a document for cameras to zoom in on. "This is a reprint of his birth certificate . . . or as it says here, certificate of birth." The document presented by Sanchez was clearly marked "certification of live birth."

The certification of live birth qualifies an individual to receive a passport, a driver's license, or otherwise establish residency for official purposes, Hawaii says.

When the birth-certificate issue emerged just before the November election, Hawaii Health Department Director Chiyome Fukino released a statement saying that she had "personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

Dr. Fukino added in an apparent effort to head off conspiracy theorists: "No state official . . . has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii."

When the blogosphere tempest flared up again recently, Fukino issued another, slightly different statement, saying she has "seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen."

Several courts have sided with the Hawaii Health Department's position that birth records must be protected as private. In December, the U.S. Supreme Court declined without comment to hear a case that challenged Obama's constitutional eligibility to be president.

Hawaii health officials have stated in the past that they maintain Obama's original birth certificate and have it in their possession. The Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin carried the announcement of Obama's birth about nine days after it occurred, although that has not convinced the birthers.

Why the ongoing interest in the long-form, original birth certificate, even among conservatives who don't dispute that Obama was born in the state of Hawaii?

Obama's critics complain the birth certificate echoes a pattern of promising transparency on the one hand while refusing to release key documents on the other, including detailed personal health records, Obama's correspondence while an Illinois senator, his attorney client list or billing records, or his college transcripts.

They also point out that Obama is the only modern president whose precise place of birth remains undetermined. Honolulu's Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital has been widely cited as his birthplace, but another Honolulu location has been mentioned as well.

The hospital has declined to address whether Obama was born there. Presidential birthplaces typically receive recognition and commemoration.

WHAT THE IRS DOESNT WANT YOU TO KNOW

2009-08-09T21:58:00.000-07:00

There is no law which requires you to file an income tax return for working in America.

There is no law which requires you to pay income tax for working in America.

You volunteer when you sign a income tax return.

You volunteer when you pay income tax.

You sign away your 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination when you sign a tax return.

The money which you pay as your " income tax " goes to a private banking cartel known as the Federal Reserve System. This organization, also known as the " FED," is NOT a government agency.

The fact is that our nation is ruled by a private banking cartel, the Federal Reserve System, which, having taken control of our country and its sovereign power of making money, itself makes money out of thin air and loans it to our nation. It is the inherent breakdown of this Federal Reserve System which leads to the progressive rise in prices, a fraudulent and ever rising " national debt," the loss of the value and purchasing power of the dollar, the need for 2 parents to work to achieve a adequate income, and many other symptoms of a decaying economy. The " income tax " is the payment demanded by this private banking cartel for the " service " ( the loaning of the money which they create ) which they perform. Our representatives, including Senator Boxer, have been bought and paid for by that banking cartel which has conquered our nation and takes its tribute from the citizens who are essentially plantation slaves as they work for a private bank and its stockholders ( mostly foreign ) and not the nation.

Amnesty?

2009-08-05T12:13:00.000-07:00

Racial Preferences in the Democrats' Health Care Bill

2009-08-05T11:21:00.001-07:00

All 1,018 pages of the Democrats' health care bill can be inspected here. The bill includes racial preferences. Under the Democrats' health care bill, if a medical school wants to increase its chances of receiving many different kinds of grants and contracts from the federal government, it should have a demonstrated record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups. This is because the Democrats' health care bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to give preference to the entities that have demonstrated such a record in the awarding of these contracts to medical schools and other institutions.

The bill does not state what would qualify as a "demonstrated record", so we can expect medical schools and the other entities to do whatever they think they can get away with to train as many "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" as they think they might need to have a better "demonstrated record" in this regard then other entities competing for the grants and contracts. The Democrats' health care bill creates a very significant financial incentive for medical schools and other entities to lower admission standards for "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" if that is what it takes to have the winning "demonstrated record".

On page 879-880, the bill states that the Secretary of Health and Human Services

"shall make grants to, or enter into contracts with, eligible entities . . . to operate a professional training program in the field of family medicine, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, or geriatrics, to provide financial assistance and traineeships and fellowships to those students, interns, residents or physicians who plan to work in or teach in the field of family medicine, general internal medicine, general pediatrics, or geriatrics."

On page 881-882 the bill states:

"In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds."

On page 883 the bill states:

"The Secretary shall make grants to, or enter into contracts with, eligible entities . . . to operate or participate in an established primary care residency training program, which may include-(A) planning and developing curricula; (B) recruitment and training of residents; and (C) retention of faculty."

On page 884-885 the bill states:

"In awarding grants and contracts . . . the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of training . . . individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds . . . ."

On page 887-889 the bill states that the

"Secretary shall make grants to, or enter into contracts with, eligible entities . . . to operate a professional training program for oral health professionals, to provide financial assistance and traineeships and fellowships to those professionals who plan to work in or teach general, pediatric, or public health dentistry, or dental hygiene, to establish, maintain, or improve academic administrative units (including departments, divisions, or other appropriate units) in the specialties of general, pediatric, or public health dentistry, to operate a loan repayment program for full-time faculty in a program of general, pediatric, or public health dentistry."

On page 889-890 the bill states:

"In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give
preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds."

On page 908-909 the bill states: "The Secretary shall award grants and contracts to eligible entities" to do the same things for the field of public health as the Secretary can do for dentistry.

On page 909 the bill states:

"In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds."

Apart from the legality of such preferences under the U.S. Constitution and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the unfairness to those who are not "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups", the Democrats' policy will foster the racial preference climate that continues to stigmatize and demean those individuals who receive the preferences. For example, if you know nothing else about two university students, except that one was probably admitted under a program where intellectual standards were reduced and the student received a preference for being the child of an alumnus, and the other was admitted under more rigorous intellectual standards without receiving any nonmerit-based preference, what are you going to think about these two students? Is the answer any different when the preference is based on race rather than an alumni relationship?

A nonmerit-based preference program based on an individual's physical appearance or surname is no less a "badge of inferiority" than the one condemned in Brown v. Board of Education. Thanks to the Democrats' racial preference program, all of the "individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups" at these medical schools and other entities, including those who deserved admission without the racial preference, will wear that badge.

http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-Billtext-071409.pdf

-----
Take a look at what actually is in the Health Care bill. Obama makes disingenuous comments like "You'll still keep your doctor" or "You'll keep your existing health care." He is either lying to us or he has no idea what is in it. Take a peek at the full report, or look at some of the highlights here:

Pg 22 of the HC Bill mandates the Government will audit books of all employers that self insure. Can you imagine what that will do to small businesses? Every one will abandon “self insurance” and go on Government insurance. So when Obama says that there will still be private health care, it’s simply a lie: this mandate will force employers to abandon their private plans.

Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill – a Government committee (good luck with that!) will decide what treatments/benefits a person may receive.

Pg 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill - YOUR HEALTHCARE WILL BE RATIONED! (We all knew this, because health care is rationed in Canada and Britain, but Obama kept saying it would not be).

Pg 42 of HC Bill – The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC Benefits for you. You will have no choice!

PG 50 Section 152 in HC bill - HC will be provided to ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise.

Pg 58 HC Bill – Government will have real-time access to individual’s finances and a National ID Healthcard will be issued!

Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Government will have direct access to your bank accts for electronic funds transfer

PG 65 Sec 164 is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in Unions & community organizations (read: ACORN).

Pg 72 Lines 8-14 Government will create an HC Exchange to bring private HC plans under Government control.

PG 84 Sec 203 HC bill - Government mandates ALL benefit packages for private HC plans in the Exchange.

PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specifics of Benefit Levels for Plans = The Government will ration your Healthcare!

PG 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill - Government mandates linguistic appropriate services. Example - Translation for illegal aliens.

Pg 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18 The Government will use groups, i.e. ACORN & Americorps, to sign up individuals for Government HC plan.

PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specifics of Benefit Levels for Plans. AARP members - your Health care WILL be rationed.

-PG 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill - Medicaid Eligible Individuals will be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. No choice.

pg 124 lines 24-25 HC No company can sue Government on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Government Monopoly.

pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill - Doctors/ AMA - The Government will tell YOU what you can earn.

Pg 145 Line 15-17 An Employer MUST auto enroll employees into public option plan. NO CHOICE.

Pg 126 Lines 22-25 Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families.

Pg 149 Lines 16-24 ANY Employer with payroll $400k & above who does not provide public option pays 8% tax on all payroll.

pg 150 Lines 9-13 Businesses with payroll between $251k & $400k who don’t provide public option pay 2-6% tax on all payroll.

Pg 167 Lines 18-23 ANY individual who doesn’t have acceptable HC according to Government will be taxed 2.5% of income.

Pg 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay.)

Pg 195 HC Bill -officers & employees of HC Admin (the GOVERNMENT) will have access to ALL Americans’ finances and personal records.

PG 203 Line 14-15 HC - "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax" Yes, it says that.

Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill Government will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors, low income, poor affected.

Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill – Doctors – doesn’t matter what specialty – will all be paid the same.

PG 253 Line 10-18 Government sets value of Doctor’s time, professional judgment, etc. Literally, value of humans.

PG 265 Sec 1131Government mandates & controls productivity for private HC industries.

PG 268 Sec 1141 Federal Government regulates rental & purchase of power driven wheelchairs.

PG 272 SEC. 1145. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS - Cancer patients - welcome to rationing!

Page 280 Sec 1151 The Government will penalize hospitals for what Government deems preventable readmissions.

Pg 298 Lines 9-11 Doctors who treat a patient during initial admission that results in a readmission - Government will penalize you.

Pg 317 L 13-20 PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. Government tells Doctors what/how much they can own.

Pg 317-318 lines 21-25,1-3 PROHIBITION on expansion - Government will mandate hospitals cannot expand.

pg 321 2-13 Hospitals have opportunity to apply for exception BUT community input required. Can u say ACORN?!

Pg335 L 16-25 Pg 336-339 - Government mandates establishment of outcome-based measures which of course forces health care rationing.

Pg 341 Lines 3-9 Government has authority to disqualify Medicare Adv Plans, HMOs, etc., forcing people into Government plan.

Pg 354 Sec 1177 - Government will RESTRICT enrollment of Special needs people!

Pg 379 Sec 1191 Government creates more bureaucracy - Telehealth Advisory Committee. HC by phone.

PG 425 Lines 4-12 Government mandates Advance Care Planning Consultations. Think Senior Citizens end of life prodding.

Pg 425 Lines 17-19 Government will instruct & consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney. Mandatory!

PG 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Government provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in how to die.

PG 427 Lines 15-24 Government mandates program for orders for end of life. The Government has a say in how your life ends.

Pg 429 Lines 1-9 An "advanced care planning consultant" will be used frequently as patients’ health deteriorates.

PG 429 Lines 10-12 "advanced care consultation" may include an ORDER for end of life plans. AN ORDER from the Government to end a life!

Pg 429 Lines 13-25 - The Government will specify which Doctors can write an end of life order.

PG 430 Lines 11-15 The Government will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life.

Pg 469 - Community Based Home Medical Services/Non profit orgs. (ACORN Medical Services here?)

Page 472 Lines 14-17 PAYMENT TO COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATION. 1 monthly payment to a community-based organization. (Like ACORN?)

PG 489 Sec 1308 The Government will cover Marriage & Family therapy. Which means they will insert Government into our marriages.

Pg 494-498 Government will cover Mental Health Services including defining, creating, rationing those services. You’d better speak up now before you are on the "advanced care consultation" list.

Here is the "Certification of Live Birth" presented by Barack Hussein Obama : click here to see the difference of a real one - Obama's is fake

2009-08-05T11:17:00.000-07:00

Has Obama “acted stupidly” for not providing the nation his birth cirtificate?

2009-08-05T11:13:00.000-07:00

More and more whites complaining of racial double-standard

2009-08-05T10:50:00.000-07:00

"Change"

2009-08-02T21:18:00.000-07:00

Hawaii's statement on Obama birth record breaks law?

2009-07-29T12:52:00.000-07:00

Responding to the growing controversy over the White House's refusal to release President Obama's original long-form birth certificate, Hawaii's director of health issued a statement yesterday about the document in apparent contravention of Hawaiian law.

Dr. Chiyome Fukino declared she has seen the "original birth records" that verify Obama was born in Hawaii and is a "natural-born American citizen," the Honolulu Advertiser reported.

But in two separate telephone interviews with WND, Janice Okubo, the Health Department's public information officer, told WND that Hawaii law prohibited her from commenting on the birth records of any specific person.

Okubo cited Hawaii Revised Statutes Section 338-18, which pertains to "Disclosure of Records."

That section of Hawaii state law states regarding the release of vital statistics records, "The department shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record."

WND asked Okubo last night how Fukino could comment on Obama's particular birth records without violating the statute.

"I'm not a legal authority, and you'd have to talk to someone who is a legal authority," Okubo said. "I don't have that kind of legal expertise."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105347

---

Unveiled! Hawaii's 1961 long-form birth certificates

Images of two 1961 Hawaii birth certificates similar to the one President Obama purportedly has on file have now been unveiled.

The Honolulu Advertiser published photostats of the original long-form birth certificates of twin daughters born to Eleanor Nordyke at Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital Aug. 5, 1961, one day after Obama was supposedly born at the same facility.

The Nordykes' certificates include information missing from the short-form document for Obama published online, including the name of the hospital, the name of the attending physician, name and address of the parents, the race of the parents and the race of the baby.

As WND reported yesterday, Hawaii's director of health responded to the growing controversy over the White House's refusal to release Obama's original long-form birth certificate by issuing a statement about the document in apparent contravention of Hawaiian law.

Dr. Chiyome Fukino declared she has seen the "original birth records

But in two separate telephone interviews with WND, Janice Okubo, the health department's public information officer, told WND that Hawaii law prohibited her from commenting on the birth records of any specific person.

WND also reported the Hawaii Department of Heath affirmed that no paper birth certificate records were destroyed when the department moved to electronic record-keeping in 2001.

The statement to WND by Janice Okubo, public information officer for state's health department, contradicted CNN U.S. President Jon Klein, who ordered host Lou Dobbs to quit discussing Obama's birth certificate on the air. Klein insisted the issue was "dead" because Obama's original long-form birth certificate had been destroyed by the Hawaii DOH in the conversion to electronic files.

A close examination of the birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins shows the registration number precedes the number given Obama, even though the future president was born a day earlier.

Susan Nordyke was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time and was given No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

Gretchen Nordyke followed at 2:17 p.m. and was given No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

According to a version of Obama's purported short-form certificate available from FactCheck.org, Obama was given a higher registration number than the Nordyke twins. The online image indicates the number is No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.

The middle figure in Obama's purported registration also is different than the Nordykes'. Obama's is 1961, indicating the year, while the Nordykes' is merely 61.

One explanation for the out-of-order serial numbers might be that several serialized stacks of birth certificates were made available at different hospitals.

Another possibility is that Obama's number is not a genuine registration number created in 1961 but was issued when the short-form document was generated during the 2008 presidential campaign.

Eleanor Nordyke told WND she thinks her twins got lower numbers because she went into the hospital Aug. 4, 1961, and was in labor for 20 hours before she delivered. She speculates that Ann Dunham came in after her and was given a later number, even though Dunham's baby was born earlier. Nordyke's twins were not born until the afternoon of the next day.

WND was unable to receive a response from Hawaii officials regarding the state's procedure for issuing registration numbers.

Meanwhile, an image of an apparently fraudulent Kenyan certificate of birth circulated on the Web today from an unknown source. It alleged Obama was born in Mombasa. But a contributor at FreeRepublic.com debunked it, declaring "Busted!"

He pointed out that the background text, in Dutch, explained, in a rough translation, "This is not a government document. This is political commentary."

It's not just Obama's original birth certificate at issue. WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105347

Do YOU Fear Obama?

2009-07-29T12:30:00.000-07:00

Since the most powerful people in America fear the wrath of Obamanation, maybe you should too! They are indeed a dangerous bunch, after all…

Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand. Do you think there is no reason for this?

The Basic Facts

•Barack Hussein Obama is foreign born, period (Kenya)
•Regardless of his birth place, his parents had foreign loyalties (strike 2)
•He has foreign loyalties, demonstrated in every policy decision (strike 3)
•He’s not Christian, but Muslim
•He’s not “black,” but Arab
•There is NO U.S. birth certificate, other than the forged COLB
•NO Hawaiian hospital will confirm his birth place (he has named two)
•His policies are designed to destroy the Constitutional Republic, not to uphold or defend (strike 4)
•He won’t go away without a blood bath

-----

Tell Obama the meaning of the term 'birth certificate'
FedEx personalized letter demanding he prove eligibility

WASHINGTON – Barack Obama is making it crystal clear he has no plans to release documents that will assure millions of American doubters he is indeed constitutionally eligible for the presidency.

The administration is taking a hard line against releasing a copy of Obama's birth certificate, claiming nothing will ever satisfy those who demand proof of his Hawaiian birth.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs says Obama has made the case "ad nauseum." He added there was nothing he could to "assuage those who believe he wasn't born here."

"But that's not really the point," says Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND. "This is not about whether Obama feels like changing minds. This is a constitutional requirement. And if Obama continues to flout the Constitution, the pressure is only going to rise."

Farah, who previously launched an eligibility petition campaign that has garnered more than 400,000 electronic "signatures," staked a $10,000 bounty for anyone with first-hand information about Obama's birth and is conducting a national billboard campaign on the birth certificate, has a birthday surprise ready for Obama next week.

He is asking people to flood the White House with personalized letters to Obama demanding the birth certificate and other pertinent documents which he will overnight deliver to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in time for Obama's birthday next Tuesday.

Join a fax blast campaign asking attorneys general across the nation to investigate Obama's eligiblity.

"I don't know if this campaign will do any good," said Farah. "But I do know he's going to get a message from the American people this week and next that he never imagined. If he thinks this story is fading away, he's got another think coming."

The letter, which will be individually, electronically "signed" by each participant in the program, begins: "Today, according to your autobiographical account, you turn 48 years old. I am asking you to use the occasion of your birthday to clear up a serious and rapidly growing controversy surrounding your presidency – a controversy regarding your birth."

"I'm referring, of course, to your unwillingness so far to release publicly a document critical to the establishment of your constitutional eligibility for the highest office in the land," the letter continues. "That document is a long-form certificate of live birth, better known as a birth certificate – the only document that can authoritatively establish the actual hospital of your birth and the attending physician."

Sending the letter costs the participant only $6.95 for the overnight delivery by Federal Express.

"If people want to write their own letters, I encourage it," says Farah. "But this is an easy way to get involved at a low cost and with high impact."

The letter to Obama continues:

Your spokesmen have tried to diminish and denigrate the importance of releasing such a document – claiming, in fact, that you have done so by the issuance of a "certification of live birth," a short-form document that cannot possibly be used as the basis for establishing your unquestionable constitutional eligibility as a "natural born citizen."
The problem with the short-form certification is that it could easily be obtained for a birth that took place out of the state or out of the country. All it would take is the word of one parent.

You pledged to lead an administration that would be noted for its transparency and openness upon winning the presidency. Yet, you have demonstrated a shocking unwillingness to be transparent and open about your own life story. You've refused steadfastly to release simple personal documents such as your birth certificate, passport information and your college records and papers – the kinds of documents all other presidents and even presidential candidates routinely release for public and press scrutiny.

The American people are becoming more aware of this obstinacy on your part and are growing more deeply suspicious about what you may or may not be hiding.

As you celebrate your birthday this week, I join with other American citizens in asking you to do the right thing – release a copy of your long-form birth certificate along with all your college records and passport history.

As Americans face up to the tough challenges confronting them, it is critical that they have confidence in their representative government and their knowledge that the rule of law applies to everyone equally – including the president of the United States.

Sincerely,

The campaign runs until Monday, Aug. 3 at 1 p.m. Eastern time – to ensure all letters get to Obama by his birthday.

"My goal is to ensure Obama gets at least 10,000 birthday surprise letters – and the message that he cannot continue to dodge this issue," said Farah. "Obama wrote in his autobiography that he had a birth certificate that caused him to question his own identity. Now it's time for him to share that mystery with the rest of us."

Sign up to send your overnight letter to President Obama now.

http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=3136

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105225

IMPEACH OBAMA

2009-07-29T12:22:00.000-07:00

To: The US Congress and The Supreme Court: Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, DC 20543.

We the Citizens, signed below, of the United States of America, hereby request that President Barack Hussein Obama II, be Impeached from office and a Impeachment election be prepared. Based on the following unanswered questions and concerns of the American people:

1. Voter irregularities around the country, during the 2008 Presidential Election, involving ACORN and illegal voter registration.

2. The questionable funding and television sponsorship of Obama which unfairly presented the facts between each candidate.

3. Barack Hussein Obama II actual birth place.

4. His application and subsequent acceptance of a fellowship scholarship as a Foreign Citizen

5. His recent comments claiming America is no longer a Christian Nation

6. His comments claiming America is a Great Muslim Nation.

7. His seeking to take over and control the banking institution

8. His take over actions of America auto industry

9. Grave concerns of releasing Classified Military Documentation

10. The impending closure of GUTMO

11. His continued apologies to foreign countries about America being a strong Nation.

The most fundamental right of the citizens of these United States is to be presented with true and accurate facts on candidates that are seeking the presidency of the United States of America. The unanswered questions with regards to campaign funding, grass-root efforts by ACORN to get voters registered at any cost, concerns on why Barack Hussein Obama II received a Fellowship Scholarship based on his Foreign National Citizenship, certified copies of his original birth certificate and most importantly, his intentions behind making claims that America is no longer a Christian Nation, must be addressed and defined to the satisfaction of the Citizens of America.

Thus, we the people seek the recall of President Barrack Hussein Obama II, and respectfully request the House of Representatives and the Senate to move forward with a recall action immediately.

Sincerely,

The Citizens of the United States of America

Sign the petition

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/3/impeach-obama

Barack Obama Has A Deep-Seated Hatred Of White People! Glenn Beck

2009-07-29T11:32:00.000-07:00

http://earth2obama.org/

The Anti-Defamation League’s extreme double standard in regards to ‘hate crimes’

2009-07-29T11:15:00.000-07:00

The ADL Applauds Senate’s Passage of Hate Crime Legislation. The Bill which is known as the The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, passed the Senate 63-28and is supported by the President who will sign it into law. Organizations such as the ADL have aggressively promoted hate crime legislation. These organizations have endorsed Europe and Canada’s policies on prosecuting what they deem as hate speech. The ADL openly advocates for their model anti-hate law which has been adopted by many states.

The bill is unconstitutional because it violates the 10th Amendment by granting the Federal Government authority over local and state government in prosecuting hate crimes. It violates the 14th Amendment by granting certain groups special protected status, as well the double jeopardy clause of the 5th amendment.

Recently the Plains State ADL Director denounced the 1st Amendment by saying that “freedom of speech does not extend to racist groups, nor give their supporters the right to threaten and intimidate others or commit acts of violence.”In many western nations, an individual can be prosecuted by the government for certain speech. In 1988 the ADL gave out an award to law student Joseph Ribikoff for writing a proposed hate crime bill that would criminalize hate speech against gays and minorities.

In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, ADL Washington counsel Michael Lieberman spoke in support of the Hate Crimes Bill. "We have no illusions about this legislation," Lieberman testified. "We know that bigotry, racism, homophobia, and anti-Semitism cannot be legislated out of existence. A new federal law that finally addresses all victims of hate crimes will not eliminate them."

Let us take a look at how the ADL has handled two major hate crimes. They exploited the racial Murder of James Byrd using the tragedy to call for stiffer hate crime laws and a tougher stance against white racism. However they take a very differant stand when whites are the victims of hate crimes.

Not to excuse his crimes but it is important to note that John King, the white supremacist who was responsible for the murder of James Byrd became a hardened racist due to his experience being gang raped by black gang members while incarcerated in a notorious Texas Prison for a petty crime. He latter joined a white gang for protection [See Becoming A Devil, by Joseph Sobran].

That part of King's story was completely ignored by the media because it would change the perception of him as from an evil white supremacist to a man who was driven insane and full of hatred by being a victim of a horrific crime just because he was white. When Michael Jackson was accused of child molestation it was brought to attention that he was abused as a child and that gained him sympathy by some segments of the society while hardly anyone had any sympathy for King.

In regards to the horrific black and white crime known as the Knoxville murders the ADL took and very differant position. Quoting an article by James H. Lilley, also stated in other blogs, etc:

On Saturday January 6, 2007 Hugh Christopher Newsom, age 23 and Channon Gail Christian, age 21, both students at the University of Tennessee went out on a date. They were driving in Channon's Toyota 4-Runner when they were carjacked at gunpoint.

Suddenly the crime turned far more savage than an armed car theft. Chris and Channon were kidnapped and driven to 2316 Chipman Street where they were forced into the home at gunpoint. While Channon was forced to watch, her boyfriend was raped prison style and then his penis was cut off. He was later driven to nearby railroad tracks where he was shot and set afire. But Channon's hell was just beginning. She was beaten; gang raped repeatedly in many ways, had one of her breasts cut off and bleach poured down her throat to destroy DNA evidence-all while she was still alive. To add to Channon's degradation the suspects took turns urinating on her. They too set her body afire, apparently inside the residence, but for some reason left her body there-in five separate trash bags...

The mainstream media including most mainstream conservatives with the exception of Michelle Malkin, Walter Williams, and Michael Savage refused to cover the story because they knew it would instill anger on behalf of whites. Compare that to the coverage the Duke Lacrosse gang rape of a black stripper by white Lacrosse players that ended up being a Hoax.

The ADL Condemns White Supremacist Attempts to Exploit Knoxville murders. Yet they have gone out of their way to politically exploit any crime commited by white supremacist such as the recent Holocaust Museum shooting as well as the murders of James Byrd and Matthew Sheppard, whom the hate bill is named after. The ADL also defended the horrific atrocities of Israel's Operation in Gaza. Regardless of their race all victims of horrific crimes deserve justice. The ADL has not only failed to live up to it mission "to secure justice and fair treatment to all," but has gone out of it's to support injustice whether for Chris Newsom and Channon Christian or for the people of Gaza.

ADL Director declares war on freedom of speech

The Anti-Defamation League Director for the Plains States Alan Potash, has just declared war against our First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Potash made the following statement, which was published in the May 26 edition of The Omaha World Herald.

“Dangers of hate,” was right to point out that freedom of speech does not extend to racist groups, nor give their supporters the right to threaten and intimidate others or commit acts of violence.

But when bigots step over the line, it is vital that law enforcement and the courts have the proper tools to respond effectively.

This is why Congress should move expeditiously to approve the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevent Act - legislation that would add protection for all citizens from violent acts of intolerance.

The bill, which was approved in the House last month, would equip local law enforcement officials with tools, training and resources to investigate and prosecute bias-motivated crimes.

Like acts of terrorism, hate crimes can hurt more than the individual victim. They can instill fear and insecurity within an entire community."

The Hate Crimes Prevention Act recently passed the Congress and is now on its way to the Senate, where it is likely to pass and signed by President Obama. The Anti-Defamation League has been at the forefront of promoting hate crime legislation, and openly advocates for their model anti-hate law. In 1988 the ADL gave out an award to law student Joseph Ribikoff for writing a proposed hate crime bill that would criminalize hate speech against gays and minorities.

On the ADL's website they state their mission is "to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all." That sounds fair enough but the organization has gone out of its way to vilify anyone who disagrees with their political agenda. On a number of occasions as I have pointed out they have opposed the right to freedom of speech. The ADL has smeared as anti-semites, Professor John Mearsheimer for his book critical of the Israeli Lobby and former President Jimmy Carter for his book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid".

The ADL has also supported Europe and Canada's policies on prosecuting what their governments deem as hate speech. While they have aligned themselves with the Neoconservatives on the issue of Israel they have also joined with leftist organizations such as the Southern Poverty Center by smearing CNN's Lou Dobbs as well as Pat Buchanan for their views on immigration as racist while ignoring the fact that Israel's immigration policy makes Dobb's and Buchanan's look liberal in comparison.

The ADL claims to be fighting the defamation of the Jewish people but they are doing a grave disservice to Jewish Americans who believe in liberty and freedom of speech by claiming to advocate on their behalf. The ADL has also tried to stifle dissent within the Jewish community such as in the cases of Tony Judt and Norman Finkelstein.

http://www.examiner.com/x-9462-LA-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2009m7d26-The-AntiDefamation-Leagues-extreme-double-standard-in-regard-to-hate-crimes

http://www.examiner.com/x-9462-LA-Ron-Paul-Examiner~y2009m6d1-ADL-director-declares-war-on-our-right-to-freedom-of-speech

SOCIALISM and THE JEW WORLD ORDER

2009-07-15T12:51:00.000-07:00

Orwell warned us that tyranny begins with the abuse of language, and that "who defines controls." With these thoughts in mind, we need to take another look at some important political terms which have been so loaded with connotations by propagandists posing as historians, entertainers, teachers and journalists that a loaded word tends to preclude our thinking. Instead, our thinking should be stimulated toward achieving solutions to the social/national problems now confronting us.

Consider the word, "socialism". Proponents of various political ideologies have tried to monopolize this word to define their specific and often divergent social programs, while other political ideologists, who are equally socialistic in their thinking, deny that they are socialists, and seek to label their opponents with the term. In practice, socialism addresses any society, whether that society be monarchistic, theocratic, democratic, plutocratic, kleptocratic, anarchistic, etc. Society appears to have natural limits as to inclusivity, as we see in the Balkans and India, where distinct societies live within uneasy proximity to one another, maintaining their separate and distinct identities despite centuries of coexistence and race-mixing. Social-thinking and so-called socialist programs cannot be applied outside of the society in question. These practical limits were demonstrated in World War I with the most recent collapse of international socialism, which was premised on the myth of international working class solidarity. The various proponents of this Second International Socialism betrayed their principles in favor of their respective national loyalties, which caused millions of working class men to be killed in the ensuing war. World War I was the graveyard of nationalism and international socialism.

That disaster led to the formation of Third International Socialism under the Jew, Vladimir Ulyanov, alias Lenin. Like all internationalist doctrines, this kosher brand of socialism was a cloak for Jewish imperialism: universalism on behalf of tribalism. Mussolini, a long time socialist, saw that nationalism could be the only basis for socialism. When things were serious, people fought for their own kind and not for some utopian scheme of unrealized possibilities. Mussolini's Fascism was basically an economic system based on the real constituencies of the Italian state: the land owners, industrialists, workers, peasants, the army, the monarchy and the church. The previous de jure regional constituencies of the Italian parliament were irrelevant, and Italy was frozen in a state of governmental gridlock, with strikes, lockouts, growing poverty and disorder. So it was that the King of Italy appointed Mussolini his prime minister, for he had nothing to lose. As history teaches, Mussolini got Italy working harmoniously, not as a dictator, but as an arbitrator who worked to achieve a consensus from Italy's disparate classes and interest groups. Because Mussolini depended on consensus derived from a balance of power, his rise was swift and easy, just as his fall was swift and easy.

Hitler had also learned hard lessons from history. He was also a social thinker and saw great strength in the mating of two major political ideas: nationalism and socialism, both of which had huge numbers of adherents in postwar WW I Germany. Instead of basing his state on economics, Hitler based the new German state on race. National Socialism was, in practice, a form of totalitarian populism. It was far more democratic than any regime in the U.S.A. or Britain, and it was also more authoritarian, in that the leaders were authorized to fulfill their responsibilities and were also accountable to their people. Savitri Devi said that National Socialism was a temporal expression of cosmic truth. For these reasons, it took the Jews and their minions much greater effort to remove Hitler from office than it did Mussolini.

So-called internationalism is really Jewish imperialism. The Jews have long used such internationalist ideologies as Communism, Christianity and Capitalism to achieve their goal of world domination. Jewish imperialism or Zionism, uses any tool to bring about The Jew World Order and the enslavement of mankind, just as a carpenter uses any tool to build a cabinet, whether it be a saw, a hammer, a drill, a plane, etc. A wise observer does not say that the woodworker is a 'driller', a 'planer', a 'sawyer', etc, but a carpenter. A wise political observer will not view a seeker of world conquest as a Christian, a Communist or a Capitalist, but will understand that the user of these means is a Jew or Zionist who seeks to achieve, as an end, world conquest and enslavement. Jews have always used other peoples as their agents toward the achievement of their evil ends. These peoples are called "golem", a murderous monster which kills the Jews' enemies toward the advancement of Zionist domination. The British were the Jews' golem in the l9th century and the Americans are their golem of the 20th century. Of course, the golem are unnatural creatures, so they destroy themselves as they obey their Jew masters. Will the Chinese be the Jews' golem in the 21st century? Stay tuned!

OUR RACE IS OUR NATION!

by Eric Thomson

Socialism, according to Karl Marx

2009-07-15T12:32:00.000-07:00

Is the transition between capitalism and communism. To achieve communism, Marx says, there must be continuing revolution in which the fundamental principal is: The end justifies the means.

For more than half a century, capitalism in the United States has taken a beating from the socialist revolution. Despite the best efforts of conservatives since the Roosevelt era, socialists have made great strides toward converting the nation to socialism. Apparently, the majority of Americans either fail to recognize the transition, or welcome it. The enthusiastic support for Barack Obama, especially among young people, is abundant evidence.

Obama has declared that he believes every person has a "right" to health care. The Socialist Party USA believes every person has a "right" to health care.

Obama believes that labor unions should be allowed to organize without a secret ballot. The Socialist Party USA calls for unions to be recognized without a secret ballot. (Hear Obama's words here.)

The Socialist Party USA recognizes the "right" of adequate housing for everyone. Obama trained ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) workers to secure mortgages for unqualified people in sufficient numbers to collapse the housing and home-financing industries.

The Socialist Party USA believes that "capitalism is fundamentally incompatible" with socialism. For years, Obama worked in Chicago through the Annenberg Challenge, along with Bill Ayers, to funnel more than $50 million to anti-capitalist education projects. In November 2006, Ayers traveled to Venezuela to speak at Hugo Chavez's Education Forum where he railed against "the failings of capitalist education," and praised the "Bolivarian Revolution and the profound reforms in education made by Hugo Chavez."

The Socialist Party USA believes in open borders and six-months residency as the only requirement for U.S. citizenship. Obama marched with illegal aliens in Chicago in support of "comprehensive" immigration reform.

The Socialist Party USA calls for an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. Obama says, "I will end this war," with never a reference to "winning" or "victory."

The Socialist Party USA calls for the "unconditional disarmament" by the United States. Obama has promised to dramatically reduce defense spending.

The Socialist Party USA calls for a "livable guaranteed annual income." Obama trained ACORN members to conduct "Living Wage" campaigns in cities around the country.

The Socialist Party USA calls for a "steeply graduated" tax policy to redistribute wealth. Obama has promised to increase the tax burden on the rich to redistribute wealth to the poor. He revealed his philosophy when answering a question from Joe the plumber, who complained that he was being taxed for his success. Obama said:

"It's not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they've got a chance for success too. My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

This list of comparisons could be quite long. This is sufficient to reveal an unmistakable similarity between Obama's political beliefs and the beliefs of the Socialist Party USA. The tragedy is that Obama's supporters don't care. In fact, many of his supporters are delighted that he promises to usher in a new era of socialism, and push the memory of capitalism further into history.

Socialists, who are in perpetual revolution, who believe that the end justifies the means, have worked through educational institutions, non-government organizations such as ACORN and by electing socialists to public office to silence teaching the virtues of free enterprise, capitalism, private property, individual responsibility and personal achievement. For nearly two generations, students have been fed a steady diet of socialism under a variety of disguises, including Outcome Based Education, No Child Left Behind, School-to-Work and a host of other "feel good" slogans.

Students and young adults no longer know why capitalism is better than socialism. Like Obama, young people really believe that when government redistributes wealth, "it's good for everybody." They do not realize that wealth redistribution is no substitute for wealth creation. They are never taught that the only way to create wealth is for an individual to combine his energy and intellect with resources to produce a product that improves his life, or for which someone else is willing to pay.

Private property, the accumulation of personal prosperity and individual achievement are anathema to socialism. Socialism sees the individual as nothing more than a cog in a government-run machine designed to ensure equity for all.

Capitalism seeks prosperity; socialism seeks equity. Freedom increases as prosperity increases. In a socialist system, there can be neither.

The Socialist Party USA believes that "capitalism is fundamentally incompatible" with socialism. For years, Obama worked in Chicago through the Annenberg Challenge, along with Bill Ayers, to funnel more than $50 million to anti-capitalist education projects. In November 2006, Ayers traveled to Venezuela to speak at Hugo Chavez's Education Forum where he railed against "the failings of capitalist education," and praised the "Bolivarian Revolution and the profound reforms in education made by Hugo Chavez."

The Socialist Party USA believes in open borders and six-months residency as the only requirement for U.S. citizenship. Obama marched with illegal aliens in Chicago in support of "comprehensive" immigration reform.

The Socialist Party USA calls for the "unconditional disarmament" by the United States. Obama has promised to dramatically reduce defense spending.

The Socialist Party USA calls for a "livable guaranteed annual income." Obama trained ACORN members to conduct "Living Wage" campaigns in cities around the country.

more to read here -

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd451.htm
http://socialistparty-usa.org/

Talmudic Law Permits Pedophilia

2009-07-15T11:44:00.000-07:00

Warning! this stuff is severely sick!

The Talmud is a record of Rabbic discussions pertaining to Jewish law, ethics,
customs.Included are rules regarding sexual behavior. The Talmud has two main components: the Mishnah, the first compendium of Judaism's Oral Law; and the Gemara which is a discussion of the Mishnah and writings.

We urge the skeptical reader to write down all the Talmud references
and read the twisted quotes directly from the jews book. It is pure evil.
The Talmud is available at: www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm
We have also included in this article the definitions of various words
that the reader may or may not be familar with.

Religion in the Talmud attempts to penetrate the whole of jewish life
with A twisted sense of what is wrong and right. Nothing is trivial;
everything is regulated and sanctified by their false religion. Religious
precept and duty accompany the Kike from their earliest years to the grave and
beyond it. The goal of the Talmud is to guide the desires and actions
of the Heb at every moment. The talmud is about controlling jew behavior.

The jews holy book the Talmud permits Marriage and sexual intercourse between
children and adults and endorses a number of other vile, sickening sexual
perversions that are most worthy of death.

The Pedophilic doctrine is contained in a number of Talmudic Mishnahs.

"WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN HAS HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A LITTLE GIRL, OR
WHEN A SMALL BOY HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, OR INJURED BY A PIECE OF
WOOD THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED..."
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11a

Let's review the above Mishnah: "When a grown-up man has had sexual
intercourse with a little girl, or when a small boy has intercourse with a
grown-up woman …" It is obvious that sex activity between a grown man and
a little girl, and between a grown woman and a little boy, is a part of everyday
Talmud life; such relationships are ordinary. There is no prohibition on sexual
activity between adults and young children it is simply just regulated activity. This is just the beginning of the perversions...

"Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty
" Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 54b

What is Pederasty? Homosexual sex with a minor.

"A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by
coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she
becomes his." Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 55b

What is Coition? Hetrosexual sex.

The Talmud allows female babies three years old and younger to be legally raped
by adults, that is jewish law. The only concern for the jew "Holy
Men" is to ensure that the adult is not, technically speaking, in violation of
any of these evil talmudic rules. Whether or not the perverted action is
acceptable just doesn't come into question.

Need more reasons to hate jews? We have plenty, keep reading!

"A girl of the age of three years and one day may be betrothed
by intercourse." Babylonian Talmud, Niddah 44b.

What is Betrothed? Engaged to be married. In this case with a baby!

Three years old is the age of consent in the Talmud! In the evil world of jewish Talmudic law, grown men are allowed to have sexual intercourse with babies. Often the young girls are wounded and bleed from the abnormal act and the Talmud also responds to the problem. The Rabbis were of the opinion that one so young can always have her virginity come back.

"Intercourse with her is like putting a finger in the eye,"
Babylonian Talmud, Niddah 44b

Baby raping to the Hebrew Rabbi filth is just a trivial matter. It is like a slight poke to the eye that causes no lasting damage.

"One who is under eleven must carry on her marital intercourse in a normal manner." Babylonian Talmud, Niddah 45a

Regardless how young, the Talmud wife is the child is still required to
carry out her "marital duties" just like a grown woman. The Rabbis
who wrote the Talmud consider it okay in the eyes of their god to marry
and rape young children.

Death to All Jewish Perverts!
(legally convicted and sentenced to capital punishment)

"WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN HAS HAD INTERCOURSE WITH A LITTLE GIRL, OR WHEN A
SMALL BOY HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, A GIRL WHO WAS INJURED
ACCIDENTALLY BY A PIECE OF WOOD. HER KETHUBAH IS A MANEH!"
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11b

What is a KETHUBAH? It's A formal Jewish marriage contract written in Aramaic and guaranteeing a bride certain future rights before her marriage. The kikes are talking about a marriage contract between a man and a little girl or a woman and a small boy.

What is MANEH? A Hebrew weight for gold or silver, being one hundred shekels
of gold and sixty shekels of silver. This is the dowry for the vile union.

To a person unaccustomed with the Talmud culture, it may seem that discussion
of sexual intercourse between grown men and very young girls is merely
theoretical. But as we shall see in the cases cited, judgments are weighed and
debated, and the jew "Holy Men" cover the subject so throughly as to
even discuss the wounds suffered by the young girls as a result of this judaism-endorsed perversion. We know that the amount of a woman's kethubah (Dowry) depends on her virginity at the wedding day. But what of a woman who, as a little girl below
the age of three years, was raped or otherwise subjected to sexual intercourse?
The jew "Holy Men" rule that the kethubah of such a woman is set as if she were still a virgin. Talmudic law doesn't consider Baby-raping, rape..

In a National Socialist government these animals would all legally recieve the rope!

" A WOMAN PROSELYTE, A WOMAN CAPTIVE, AND A WOMAN SLAVE, WHO HAVE BEEN
REDEEMED, CONVERTED, OR FREED [WHEN THEY WERE] LESS THAN THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY
OLD — THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]. AND THERE IS WITH REGARD TO THEM
THE CLAIM OF [NON-]VIRGINITY." Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11a

In modern America, sex between an adult and a child is condemned in proportion
to the youth of the child. That is, Americans generally consider sex with a
three year old far worse than sex with a sixteen year old. The younger the
child, the greater the horror. But the Talmudic law works on the reverse scale:
sex with younger children is less significant than sex with older children. How
did this disgusting doctrine come about? The Old Testament law prohibits a man
lying with a man; but the Old Testament does not prohibit a man lying with a
boy. This is how the Talmudic Rabbis have arrived at the position that justifies
and promotes evil pederasty.

The ancient Hebrews were also permitted by their god to to use children
as sex slaves. Moses established this precedent. In the passage below, the
Hebrews have just massacred the Midianite men. They return home with booty, and
the Midianite women and children. Moses directs them to slaughter the captive
women and children with this exception: virgin girl children are to be kept as
concubines for the Hebrews.

"And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto Moses,
and Eleazar the priest, and unto the congregation of the children of Israel,
unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near Jericho. And
Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went
forth to meet them without the camp. And Moses was wroth with the officers of
the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which
came from the battle. And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women
alive? Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of
Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was
a plague among the congregation of the LORD. Now therefore kill every male among
the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him..But
all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive
for yourselves. " Numbers 31:12-18 (KJV)

From the above the Talmudic Rabbis reason that, since Phinehas was among the
Hebrews who were permitted a child Sex-slave and Phinehas was a priest, Numbers
31:17-18 is Divine sanction for the marriage of priests with babies under the
age of three. The rabbis describe the gentile babies as proselytes.

What is a proselyte? a Gentile converted to Judaism.

"R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the age of three
years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the
women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for
yourselves, and Phinehas surely was with them. If so, a proselyte whose age is
three years and one day should also be permitted! It is written, Kill every
woman that hath known man by lying with him, but if she hath not known, save her
alive; from this it may be inferred that children are to be kept alive whether
they have known or have not known [a man]; and, on the other hand, it is also
written, But all the women children, that have not known man by lying with him,
keep alive for yourselves, but do not spare them if they have known.
Consequently it must be said that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for
cohabitation. " Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yebamoth 60b

What is Cohabitation? The act of living Together as husband and wife, usually
without legal or religious sanction.

The doctrine that Jewish men may have sexual intercourse with non-Jewish
children under the age of three is expanded in the following passage;
"There was a certain town in the Land of Israel the legitimacy of whose
inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an enquiry and
found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and
one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest."
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yebamoth 60b

Adult Male Faggotry

"HE WHO COMMITS SODOMY WITH A MALE OR A BEAST,
AND A WOMAN THAT COMMITS BESTIALITY ARE STONED."Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 54a

Consenting adults who engage in homosexuality recieve the death penalty for
their perversion. But homosexuality with a male child under the age of nine
years and a day is not punishable. (Sanhedrin 54b-55a)

Adult Female Faggotry

"Women who practise lewdness with one another are disqualified from
marrying a priest. "
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yebamoth 76a

The same statement appears in Shabbath 65a, page 311. The ruling, then, is only
that a woman who "commits lewdness" with another is disqualified from
marrying a priest. Thus a woman who never had ambitions to marry a priest
suffers no sanction for her homo activity.

Lesbian faggotry between two women is not forbidden in the Talmud.
Some jew "Holy Men" disapprove, but the Talmud contains
no ruling against it, and no punishment.

Oedipal Incest

"If a woman sported lewdly with her young son, and he committed the first
stage of cohabitation with her, he thereby renders her unfit to the
priesthood." Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 69b

Incest between a mother and a young son is merely a minor transgression, like a
traffic ticket! No punishment is occured other than the Rabbis don't want
the mother to become a jewish relegious leader.

in Sanhedrin 54b-55a the Kike "Holy Men" confirm, "in all crimes
of incest, the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at
least nine years and a day." Therefore, a mother who encourages her son to
have sexual intercourse with her incurs no guilt if her son is younger than nine
years old and a day. In such an arrangement, the mother would be the
"passive" adult, of course.

Incest is fine as long as the Child is under nine.
But if the victim is over nine then there is going to be hell to pay!

In the following passage, the question before the jews "Holy Men" is
this: If a mother committed incest with her son, would she still be eligible to
marry a priest? The question, of course, isn't is this acceptable behavior?
The talmud says incest is just fine under nine. Incest with a young boy is not a
concern, while incest with an older boy brings consequences to the adult. Here,
the Kike "Holy Men" debate the acceptable age for baby-raping.
"Our Rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son and he
committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, — Beth Shammai say, he
thereby renders her unfit to the priesthood. Beth Hillel declare her fit. R..
Hiyya the son of Rabbah b. All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine
years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years
is not: their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old, Beth Shammai
maintaining, We must base our ruling on the earlier generations, but Beth Hillel
hold that we do not. " Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 69

The issue rests on the boy's theoretical ability to cause conception.
Since (theoretically) a boy younger than nine cannot cause pregnancy
in his mother then according to the kike bastards he cannot be
engaging in sexual intercourse.

The boy's youth also exempts the man who sodomizes him from any moral guilt
and legal liability. That is, the young boy cannot "throw guilt" on a
man who lies with him, and the Scripture does not apply.

Baby-Wife Screamers?

In Talmud doctrine, if a wife is a screamer — that is, her voice can be heard
by the neighbors — she can be divorced without her kethubah.
" THESE ARE TO BE DIVORCED WITHOUT RECEIVING THEIR KETHUBAH: A WIFE WHO
TRANSGRESSES THE LAW OF MOSES JEWISH PRACTICE … [SUCH TRANSGRESSIONS INCLUDE]
ALSO THAT OF A WIFE WHO CURSES HER HUSBAND'S PARENTS IN HIS PRESENCE. R.
TARFON SAID: ALSO ONE WHO SCREAMS. AND WHO IS REGARDED A SCREAMER? A WOMAN WHOSE
VOICE CAN BE HEARD BY HER NEIGHBOURS WHEN SHE SPEAKS INSIDE HER HOUSE."
Babylonian Talmud, Kethuboth 72a

This gives the jew an easy out to his marriage of a three year old who makes
too much noise during the extremely painful acts of perversion.
On reading further, one talmudic passage explains that if the wife screams during intercourse, it may be a sign of a physical defect.

" What is meant by a screamer? — Rab Judah replied in the name of
Samuel: One who speaks aloud on marital matters. In a Baraitha it was taught:
[By screams was meant a wife] whose voice during her intercourse in one court
can be heard in another court. But should not this, then, have been taught in
the Mishnah among defects?" Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 72b

There is not Talmud prohibition against sexual activity between an adult and
very a young child on the basis that such activity could wound the child.
Instead, the concern of the jew "Holy Men" is focused on interpreting
Biblical injunctions and technicalities that absolve the adult from guilt or
liability: At what age, they ask, does the child begin to cause
"defilement" of the adult who uses the child for sex?This next passage
illustrates the point once more. The jew "Holy Men" debate "from
what age does a heathen child cause defilement"? Is it nine years, or is it
three years? If the correct threshold age is observed,the Jew incurs no guilt
for the perverted act of pederasty.

" From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission?
From the age of nine years and one day, for inasmuch as he is then capable of
the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to
be concluded that a heathen girl [communicates defilement] from the age of three
years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she
likewise defiles by a flux. This is obvious! — You might argue that he is at
an age when he knows to persuade [a female] but she is not at an age when she
knows to persuade [a male, and consequently although she is technically capable
of the sexual act, she does not cause defilement until she is nine years and one
day old]. Hence he informs us [that she communicates defilement at the earlier
age]. " Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah Zarah 36b-37a

Death to Baby-raping Jews!
(legally convicted and sentenced to capital punishment)

Rabbi Takes Three-Year-Old Widow

In Tractate Niddah, again there is approval for priests to marry and copulate
with baby girls. This passage describes a situation in which a priest dies
without children, leaving a three-year-old widow. In such case, the priest's
brother (the yebam) can acquire the girl by having sexual intercourse with her.
"A GIRL OF THE AGE OF THREE YEARS AND ONE DAY MAY BE BETROTHED BY
INTERCOURSE; … IF SHE WAS MARRIED TO A PRIEST, SHE MAY EAT TERUMAH. "
Babylonian Talmud Tractate Niddah 44b

What is Terumah? Temple offerings eaten by priests.

This statement indicates that the three-year-old bride
is the widow of the priest in all respects and privileges.

In the passage below, we see that the widow of a man who is not a priest can be
sexually possessed by her brother-in-law and thereby become his wife.
"Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in
marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's
brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. "

Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 55b
Wounding Baby Brides by Intercourse

The jew "Holy Men" go on to discuss sexual intercourse with a girl
younger than three years old: the inevitable wounding the child and causing her
to bleed. From the jew "Holy Men"' description, it is apparent
that the baby bleeds again and again from copulation with a grown jew, and the
jew "Holy Men", once again, attribute the bleeding to the repetitive
rupturing of the hymen.

This Gemara from Tractate Kethuboth takes up the discussion of the baby-bride
who is wounded by perverted sex with a jew.

" If a girl, whose period to see [blood] had not arrived yet, got married,
Beth Shammai say: One gives her four nights, and the disciples of Hillel say:
Until the wound is healed up. If her period to see [blood] had arrived and she
married, Beth Shammai say: One gives her the first night, and Beth Hillel say:
Until the night following the Sabbath [one gives her] four nights. "
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 6a

"MISHNAH. IF A YOUNG GIRL, WHOSE AGE OF MENSTRUATION HAS NOT YET ARRIVED,
MARRIED, BETH SHAMMAI RULED: SHE IS ALLOWED FOUR NIGHTS, AND BETH HILLEL RULED:
UNTIL THE WOUND IS HEALED. "
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Niddah 64b

At least the jews don't want to let their rape victim bleed to death...

Marital Duties of the Pre-Pubescent Bride

The marital duties of the pre-pubescent brides are addressed in at least three
tractates in almost the same words (Yebamoth 12b and 100b, Niddah 45a, and
Kethuboth 39a).

In the following passage, the jew "Holy Men" discuss the use of
contraception. All Rabbis agree that a wife younger than eleven — a wife who
is too young to become pregnant — is required to carry on "marital
intercourse" in the normal manner. Recall that baby brides can be as young
as three, and sometimes younger.

"Three classes of woman may use an absorbent in their marital intercourse:
A minor, and an expectant and a nursing mother. The minor, because otherwise she
might become pregnant and die. An expectant mother, because otherwise she might
cause her foetus to degenerate into a sandal. A nursing mother, because
otherwise she might have to wean her child prematurely, and this would result in
his death. And what is the age of such a 'minor'? From the age of eleven
years and one day to the age of twelve years and one day. One who is under this
age must carry on her marital intercourse in a normal manner; so R. Meir. But
the rabbi ruled: The one as well as the other carries on her marital intercourse
in a normal manner and mercy will be vouchsafed from heaven, for it is said in
Scripture, The Lord preserveth the simple …" Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Niddah 45a

There is simply no shortage of great reasons to hate the jews. It is little
wonder that throughout history the jews were kicked out in mass from every
european country. Heb's are nothing more than baby-raping bastards that have
earned total genocide. All it takes is an intelligent person to do a little
research into Talmudic law to see the sickening pedophile perversion their
religion promotes. Fundamentalist Hasidic Jews literally worship every word that
has been written in the Talmud by their religious leaders. They follow it
without question, believing it to be the inspired work of god.

Judaism:

a sick religion that considers it acceptable to have sex with babies.
No wonder Hitler put these kosher perverts in camps. Adolph Hitler's only
mistake was that he didn't completely clean out the jewish den of vipers
once and for all! Regardless of the media lies, the Third Reich's plans for
the jew didn't include genocide but instead, merely using their services
for slave labor.

We look forward to the day when the mass-media portrayed Holocaust-fiction is
legally enforced on every vile jew.

Death to the Perverts!

This is some severely sick sh^t and one day the Jewish perverts will pay the
ultimate price for violating children! This also goes for anyone who defiles a
child whether they be a Jew or Gentile!

All perverts have earned death! Hopefully, they will one day be executed
legally by the state...

All about Morris Dees

2009-07-14T22:13:00.000-07:00

The SPLC does not worry about the pornographers, abortionists, child-molesters, and drug-pushers who control American society If you want to read pornography, by the way, get hold of a copy of depositions taken in Morris Dees's alleged divorce trial -

http://www.zianet.com/web/dees1.htm

Who is Morris Dees -

http://web.archive.org/web/20020111181138/www.deeswatch.com/pruden.html

Dees Watch -

http://web.archive.org/web/20020802013142/www.deeswatch.com/who.html

The Church of Morris Dees

http://www.americanpatrol.com/SPLC/ChurchofMorrisDees001100.html

BOMBSHELL…Supreme Court now has Obama Citizenship / Update found out later to be un true - The media lied

2009-07-14T21:11:00.000-07:00

AP- WASHINGTON D.C. - In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group “Americans for Freedom of Information” has released copies of President Obama’s college transcripts from Occidental College. Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking.

The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama’s legitimacy and qualification to serve as president. When reached for comment in London, where he has been in meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment on the issue. Meanwhile, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs scoffed at the report stating that this was obviously another attempt by a right-wing conservative group to discredit the president and undermine the administration’s efforts to move the country in a new direction.

Britain's Daily Mail has also carried the story in a front-page article titled, “Obama Eligibility Questioned”, leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama’s first official visit to the U.K.

In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama’s legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey. This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio’s case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama’s citizenship or qualification to serve as president.

Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama’s campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter.

http://www.usjf.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=537

====================================

GOOGLE: Obama’s legal eligibility to serve as President

====================================

AP Article says Obama released his Occidental College ...
Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry ... students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. ...
MORE:>>

Fulbright Association
1100 G Street, N.W.
Suite 525
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 347-5543
Fax: (202) 347-6540
http://www.fulbrightalumni.org/olc/pub/FBA/cpages/about_us/about_us.jsp

Originally Posted by Brianroy View Post
Why do We Need Real Documents

April 26th, 2009
Due to the fact that Obama arrogantly refuses to unseal his vital records and uses his attorney Robert Bauer as a tool to harass and initmidate law abiding citizens and attorneys; there are numerous rumors on the internet about those records.
Recently I received an e-mail, stating that Obama has received a Fullbright scholarship, while at Occidental. Fullbright is given to foreign students.

[ Expensive tuition Occidental prides itself in being a Fullbright Scholarship "producer", which means: an aggressive social action College enabling qualified "foreign" applicants to attend undergraduate studies there...producing the fees/costs to attend via financial aid loans, grants, scholarships...in order that the be able to school feed/sustain itself.
"(Occidental is one of the country’s top producers of student Fulbright Award winners)."
"...Roughly three quarters of students receive financial aid..."
http://www.stateuniversity.com/universities/CA/Occidental_College.html

When 73% of your students are on Financial Aid for what is now
$34,000 a year base tuition before expenses...compare Harvard
at about $2,000 less annual tuition, and its break down the comparable costs there at:
http://www.collegecrunch.org/school-profiles/harvard-university/

AND YET Obama is likely enabled to attend on perhaps a full scholarship because of his mother's associations with the FORD Foundation to encourage being sponsorshipfrom his father's country of Kenya...meaning he needs a Kenyan passport, in addition tohisIndonesian one .

But WHO QUALIFIES for the Fullbright Scholarships?:

http://www.cies.org/about_fulb.htm

The Fullbright scholarship either BRINGS FOREIGN STUDENTS TO THE UNITED STATES to learn and be educated to receive/obtain a college/university undergraduate degree, or it will ONLY sponsor existing College/University US CITIZEN GRADUATES (prefereably Master's Degree and above) to go abroad.

http://us.fulbrightonline.org/thinking.html

Since Obama was then 18-20 yr. old Barry Soetoro...Obama was AT THAT TIME , defined by the Financial Aid terms of the Fullbright Scholarship in 1979, 1980, 1981...as a NON-US CITIZEN and "foreign national".
-- Brianroy]

...Obama needs to provide original vital records or certified copies of such records, as computerised documents might be photoshopped. This is particularly important, as representative of Hawaii health department, Dr. Fukino has only released a statement, that the Hi Health department has A document on file. She did not elaborate, what document.

Since HI statute 338 allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian birth certificates (as it was reportedly obtained for Obama’s half sister Maya Soetoro, born in Indonesia) and those can be obtained based on a statement of one relative only, such as grandmother or grandfather (which of course can be biased), it is imperative that the courts hear those cases on the merits and that the law enforcement and judges finally start doing their job and sign subpoenas for all of Obama’s vital records.

If you have certified copies of any original documents, please mail them to my office

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ,
26302 La Paz, ste 211
Mission Viejo , CA 92691

http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=123965;title=APFN

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/obama_government/news.php?q=1247515347

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/obama_government/news.php?q=1247515269

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/obama_government/news.php?q=1247603833

White folks of South Carolina go forth and spread the word of truth

2009-07-07T12:39:00.000-07:00

Recently some people in a couple of cities in a suburb of Charleston, SC received a flier about what is going on in White America. I am asking you all White folks, to make copies of this flier and get out there and inform others.

As always if you email us, we will be happy to forward you a copy of these fliers and you can download them yourself so you pass them out to fellow friends, co-workers. Or you could do a dead of the night flier run in your own neighborhoods.

For more fliers, go to http://www.nsm88.org/fliers/fliers.html

The bias media, and the most corrupt police officers in SC are not going to tell you the truth.

Here in America we still have that freedom of speech, and we all need to use it daily.

And the last time we checked South Carolina was part of the USA, therefore part of America.

They may call it littering, but as we read our Constitution birth rights, we see it as called freedom of speech and so does the Supreme Court.

SIEG HEIL !

---

The U.S. Constitution is by definition the basic law of the land; no federal, state, county, city, or community law can contradict any of the basic principles of the Constitution.

To be effective in our struggle for White racial survival, expansion and advancement, we must become thoroughly familiar with the U.S. Constitution, and especially the First Amendment which reads as follows: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

As you can see from the above quotations, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees every citizen, among other things, freedom of speech. In regards to leafleting, the Supreme Court has interpreted this to mean that a state or municipality may not ban the distribution of leaflets on streets, sidewalks of public places. (Jameson v. Texas 318 US [1943]) and (March v. Alabama 325 US 501 [1946]). The Supreme Court applied this rule to universities, both state and private, in (Papish v. University of Missouri 410 US 667 [1973]). Furthermore, leafleting cannot be prohibited on a military base in areas of public access, (Flower v. US 197 [1972]).

This Supreme Court has also found that door to door solicitation for the purpose of distributing information may not be banned regardless of the wishes of the householder to receive such information in this manner, (Martin v. Struthers 319 US 141 [1943]). Furthermore, a state or municipality may not tax or license the distribution or sale of political or religious material door to door, (Opelika V. Jones 319 US 105 [1943])

In shopping center cases the Supreme Court has said that privately owned property may be treated as if it's publicly where it is held open to the public, (Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. Logan Valley Plaza 391 US 308 [1968]). In Amalgamated the union was allowed to picket a business inside the shopping mall. However, a shopping mall may ban leafleting in the shopping mall walkways as this interferes with the business of the center, (Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner 407 US 551 [1972]). As yet, there has not been a case decided on the question of leafleting in the parking lot of a shopping center, but a leading treatise of the First Amendment says this on the subject:

“The First Amendment interest should not be defeated because the property owner either disapproves of the message conveyed or simply wants to censor all speech activities. Whether outside of a freestanding store or in the common areas of a shopping center, a bare property interest does not justify the subordination of the First Amendment speech rights.” (Nimmer on the Freedom of Speech, Section 4.op, page 4-121)

In light of the above, it is recommended that in the event of an arrest while leafleting in one of the above areas, the individual arrested should file a civil suit for false imprisonment, malprocessing and intentional deprivation of constitutional rights and that the parties sued should include the municipality, the police department, the arresting officer and the private property owner (in a shopping center case). In such a case, punitive as well as compensatory damages will be awarded.

How to Report Illegal Immigration

2009-05-21T04:54:00.000-07:00

The immigration law that requires that aliens be documented for legal entry. Those who sneak into the country are referred to as “entry without inspection” (EWI). Others enter with legal documentation and then violate the terms on which they have been admitted by taking jobs that are not authorized or overstaying the authorized period of stay in the country. Both types of illegal immigrants are deportable under Immigration and Nationality Act Section 237 (a)(1)(B) which says:

“Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this Act or any other law of the United States is deportable.”

If you have evidence of illegal immigration, we recommend you contact your local immigration office for assistance. PLEASE Report Suspicious Activity:

PLEASE CALL
1-866-DHS-2-ICE
1-866-347-2423

I called this number and it is working start dialing everyone it is an illegal immigration tipline

To mail tips

Immigration office of enforcement investigations
425 I street North West
Washington, DC 20536

direct phone number 202-514-0078